Author: admin

How to help us

“We live in a time where only the truth is scary.”

Jean Raspail, The Camp of the Saints, Robert Laffont

How to help us

En signant les pétitions que nous lançons

  • Pétition pour l’ouverture sans limite des archives


  • Pétition pour ouverture d’un débat sur la trahison militaire


By participating in the financing of our projects

Since it is a question of rewriting all of history from the 20th century to the present day, we will have to use all the media.

This is why we have chosen two professional partners who will help us disseminate information and combat official propaganda:

Mouton noir Editions

In charge of editing the works of revisionist historians, but also:

  • Novels, comics, plays and all works of fiction based on these new historical facts and the dreams they allow for the future
  • The scientific works that will accompany the change in society essential to the emergence of the “world of tomorrow”

Visit the website

A Good Script Productions (UBS prod) 

Who will produce not only the historical documentary series essential to the review, but again, works of fiction: films, series, soap operas, and even television shows based on these new realities.

Because here is what you need to understand: Changing the world cannot be done without this synergy between science and dream, which so many media have abused for a century in order to make us adhere to “miraculous theories”.

And there again, we will have every legitimacy to use the same methods, since this time, they will serve the Truth.

Visit the website

An ambitious project that will require your support

Of course we know the innumerable pitfalls that await us. We know that to question all history from the 20th century to the present day and upset so many interests, we will have no support from the “authorities”.

This is why we have prepared this Project for so long, worked in the shadows without any funding for twenty years. It had to be brought on the same day: both all the evidence of this military betrayal and the economic data that spawned the global conspiracy.

We have, effectively I believe, done our part. But we can’t do anything more without you.

Because it is no longer abnegation and self-sacrifice that we need today, but money to be able to produce freely!

This is why we ask you to respond in large numbers to the petitions and to participate enthusiastically in the crowdfunding campaigns organized by these two companies.

Every voice you bring will weigh in front of the media.

Every euro collected will influence the banks.

Each participation in the events that we will organize soon, in order to meet you, will count for the policies.

Our initiative was citizen and republican, it will go out like a beautiful dream if you refuse it.

The French military betrayal of May-June 1940

The French military betrayal of May-June 1940

Visit our Youtube channel

After 60 years of secrecy, the archives of the Battle of France were finally opened to researchers in the year 2000.

They totally challenge the famous “Blitzkrieg” theory that: “The German victory was actually due to three main factors:

  • Incomprehensible coincidences.
  • Incomprehensible errors of the Allies.
  • A no less incomprehensible individualism of a few “go-getter” generals at the head of the armored divisions and who confronted not only the Allies, but also the German leadership with a fait accompli. »

End of quote (K.H. Frieser 1940 French defeat, German victory under the eye of foreign historians page 86)

In other words, a story that no one understood but that, for lack of anything better, the public had only to accept as it was.
However, there have never been any coincidences or incomprehensible errors, even less a series of “miracles” according to another consecrated expression, having enabled the German columns to defeat four Allied armies in twenty days, but a very long series of betrayals.

Another observation: The omerta since imposed by the French state was also imposed by all those directly concerned. Indeed, how can we imagine that Germany, which was the main beneficiary, England, which was the main victim, but also Belgium, Holland, then all the occupied European countries, Russia, or the United States wouldn’t have understood the obvious?

Information now within everyone’s reach, since the works dealing with this betrayal and the “family conspiracy” (in the plural) that accompanied it are available for sale.

To make it easier for you, also watch our films on our YouTube channel.
We develop the main information there.

The betrayal in a few lines

French revisionist historians who have been able to work effectively on the archives of the Battle of France, since their official opening in the early 2000s, have been able to establish with certainty that:

  • The German army was in no way superior to the Allied armies. The troops and materials at the disposal of the Allies on May 10, 1940 were superior in quantity and quality to the German army, including with regard to aviation.
  • The Wehrmacht’s resources of ammunition, gasoline and armament only allowed it to fight for a maximum of one month. It was therefore absolutely necessary for Hitler to win a decisive victory within this time.
  • The details of the German Plan, known as “Manstein”, providing for the main effort to be carried out in the Ardennes, on Sedan and Givet, were perfectly known to the French and Allied Intelligence Services, at the latest at the beginning of March 1940, i.e. more than two months before the attack.
  • These same services also knew for certain the date of the attack, eight days before it took place.
  • Based on this intelligence, General Gamelin, Commander-in-Chief of the Allied armies, devised a plan to lure General von Kleist’s Army Group A into the Ardennes trap.
  • This trap planned to block the enemy advance in front of the Meuse by blowing up all the bridges and accumulating powerful reserves in the immediate vicinity, in order to support the three divisions in charge of holding the banks of the Meuse from Sedan to Givet.
  • In a second movement, once von Kleist’s columns were entangled on four narrow roads in the heart of the massif in the greatest traffic jam in history, so without the possibility of quickly turning back, the generalissimo had planned a counter-attack in Belgium in the back of his adversary, at the height of the “Gembloux gap”, in order to cut him off from his supplies and from General von Bock’s army group B, still engaged in Holland.
  • Finally, in a third phase, three reserve armies stationed on the Maginot line were to attack to the north via Luxembourg in order to join the 1st army at Gembloux to begin a counter-attack in Germany which would have made it possible to seize the regions industries in the Rhineland and the Saar, before moving on to Berlin.
  • Knowing that the German army only had petrol and ammunition for one month, this plan, forcing it to fight on all fronts at the same time, would have quickly led it to capitulate, or to continue the fight by launching pebbles…

This excellent plan was sabotaged by the generals in charge of applying it

Contrary to the planned provisions and the clear orders given by General Gamelin:

  • Static defenses that should have been deployed in the French Ardennes in areas slated for destruction were not deployed. The German columns crossing the Ardennes trap in a very perilous position were not bombarded for three days.
  • The necessary modern armaments (tanks, planes, radio equipment, machine guns, etc.) were not delivered to the armies, but kept in depots, waiting to be handed over intact to the Germans.

On the front of the Second Huntziger Army

  • On May 13, from 5 a.m., when the Germans under the fire of French artillery could not cross the Meuse because they were unable to build the pontoon bridges essential for the passage of Panzers, tanks and French infantry elements that which can be designated under the term “special cagoulard sections” attacked from the back the artillery blockhouses and the various points of resistance on which the whole French device was articulated.

  • Around 3 p.m., the Bellevue blockhouse, the most important of the line, was destroyed by these French elements.

  • It was only from this moment that the first German infantrymen were able to cross the river on inflatable boats, without being mowed down by the fire from these blockhouses.

At the same time, while the Panzer Divisions and all their crossing equipment were clumping together in compact masses on the right bank of the Meuse, ideal targets for the artillery, the French General Huntziger ordered the withdrawal of these guns, this from his own initiative and without any strategic or tactical reason.

  • At the same time, he ordered the reinforcements that had come to the aid of the defenders of the Meuse to turn around, while the latter were still holding the banks.
  • The sabotage of the artillery and the gradual weakening of the troops remaining on the spot thus allowed the Germans to throw their bridges over the Meuse without suffering any losses, and the Panzers and heavy armaments were then able to cross without any opposition, the next morning May 14 at 7:20 a.m.
  • The excuse officially invoked in front of the general public to justify this withdrawal was a “collective hallucination” which caused the “panic of Bulson”.

Shameless lie, demonstrated by the production of archives and testimonies.

  • Finally the bombardments ordered for May 14, with the aim of destroying the German bridges were also sabotaged by the high command of the Air Force, in particular General Têtu, notorious Cagoulard, who stopped the waves of French attack . The British bombers, despite heavy losses, could not destroy a single one of these bridges.

On the front of the 9th Corap Army at Givet:

  • While the Republican General Corap had dispatched reinforcements in the direction of Givet to organize the defense of the Meuse and a powerful counter-attack, this was sabotaged by General Martin who, also without any reason, withdrew the troops sent in reinforcement, leaving the 1st Heavy Tank Division unsupported at the same time. Without infantry, without supporting artillery, without petrol, the 1st DCR was totally annihilated, most of the tanks having had to be destroyed by their own crews.
  • The other two armored divisions were deliberately scattered so as not to be able to effectively counter the Panzers arriving in compact masses.
  • During these two crucial days: 13 and 14 May, the fighter squadrons were either grounded or dispatched to areas where there was no enemy aviation, giving up domination of the skies to the Luftwaffe above. above Sedan and Givet, in order to further facilitate the construction of bridges and the passage of Panzers.

These orders were given by the generals who were members of the conspiracy, again against those of the high command.

On the entire front, between May 15 and May 25:

  • On the night of May 14 to 15, Generals Georges and Billotte, Commander-in-Chief on the North-East Front and the main responsible for the betrayal, ordered a general retreat of the Allied troops from the North Front in Belgium. This order was given when their position was extremely strong, facing Army Group B of the German army.
  • This orderly movement, again against the orders of General Gamelin, knowingly sabotaged what can be called “Plan Gamelin N°2” which, after the failure of the “trap on the Meuse” , had planned to “pinch” the German Panzers at the exit of the Ardennes.
  • Plan Gamelin N°3, which ordered a somewhat similar maneuver to be implemented from May 19, was sabotaged by the same generals who, again, did not carry out the orders.
  • Between May 16 and May 19, certain officers, in particular commanding tank regiments, voluntarily abandoned, and without being attacked, the bridges to the Germans who presented themselves on the Somme on the Aisne and on the Oise. (Generals Duchemin and de Beauchesne)
  • On the night of May 18 to 19, General Georges ordered, still in opposition to the formal orders of General Gamelin, to withdraw the French forces able to stop the Panzers on a Valenciennes – Laon line to withdraw them south of the Somme, thus opening wide the road to the sea for Guderian and Rommel. (Order No. 102)
    Similarly, he sabotaged the planned tank counterattacks to the north and south. The French tanks were reduced to watching, guns at their feet, the Germans pass.
  • At the same time, many elite divisions remained without a fight in the Maginot Line and were kept there until their surrender.
  • On May 20, after the dismissal of Generalissimo Gamelin, General Weygand, as the new commander of the allied armies, definitively interrupted Gamelin Plan N°3 and kept his troops without orders until May 25. It was only once the situation had been definitively compromised and the northern troops completely surrounded that he gave the necessary orders for a retreat towards Dunkirk.
  • Behind the scenes, throughout the battle, Marshal Pétain informed Hitler through the Spanish ambassador of the military decisions taken and the evolution of his political maneuver to bring down the government of Paul Reynaud, then to overthrow the Republic and sign the armistice as soon as possible.
  • When this goal was achieved, he stopped the fighting as soon as he had the power to do so.

Access to new testimonies makes it possible to establish that the state lie that followed the defeat was implemented in the following way:

The main witnesses, in their “Recollections” books, lied using writing stratagems ranging from the outright omission of essential data, to the crudest lies.
They are Generals Weygand and Georges. (speaking through the book of his chief of staff General Roton)

Among these high-ranking soldiers, other false witnesses such as Beaufre, Ruby, or Minart, as well as certain senior secret service officials used the same stratagems.

The goal was to propagate a completely false version of the Battle of France, so as to exonerate the real culprits and accuse the men who, on the contrary, had tried to counter it.

The main accused was to be Generalissimo Gamelin, while everything shows that the real culprit was General Georges.
The means employed by all these false witnesses, was to adopt without restriction, and especially without the slightest concrete element of proof, the version given by General Georges and the officers holding the Vichy regime, by trying to make believe that Gamelin did not had done nothing but count the flies in his HQ at Vincennes, totally uninterested in the battle.

This legend of the “aboulia” of the general-in-chief allowing to pass over in silence the orders he gave, and were not executed.

The French State, the main craftsman of disinformation

This state lie organized by Vichy was, in full knowledge of the facts, propagated after the Liberation by the most eminent French historians, and endorsed by the republican governments of the Fourth and Fifth Republics allowing the official version to prosper, since a number indefinite archive always remains beyond the reach of historians and that the most important of them, namely the Journal de Marche du Cabinet Gamelin – that is to say the precise day-to-day account of all events of the battle kept by the generalissimo’s staff – as well as his notebooks and personal diaries were stolen from his home before their filing in the archives by officers mandated by the Ministry of Defense only a few minutes after his death in the Val de Grâce hospital, April 18, 1958. This while Madame Gamelin was absent, and did not even know that her husband had just died (none of these documents reappeared at the time of the opening). official opening of the archives in 2000).

That is to say a few thousand absolutely essential pages as to the preparation and the unfolding of the battle, on which Generals Gamelin and Doumenc relied when writing their “testimonies for History” in order to accredit their statements, when they denounced the betrayals they suffered during the battle, as well as their actions to counter them, and the plans implemented.

To know everything about the intervention of the Ministry of Defense in 1956

Click here

If we add to this recognized theft, the “unfortunate” destruction and the disappearance, “incomprehensible” of course, of tons of archives after the war while they were under the responsibility of the Service historique des Armées, we understand better under which authority the “official” historians have totally discarded for nearly eighty years, the three books of Souvenirs written by General Gamelin, the Souvenirs de captivité of President Daladier, as well as a large number of official archives and reports.

Ditto for the two major works of General Doumenc: History of the 9th Army, and Dunkirk and the Battle of France, but also his Secret Papers, analyzed and published by the historian François Delpla in 1991.

Indeed, all these works, perfectly known to everyone and totally contradicting the “miraculous” thesis, were systematically either ignored or cited by these historians most often to divert them from their true meaning, namely a formal denunciation of the betrayals committed. work.

We will note here that it is undoubtedly unprecedented in history that the highest authorities, both military and academic, take the liberty of disregarding the testimony of the generalissimo in charge of leading a battle and of the main soldiers concerned.

The same lack of consideration for those of many Allied generals and political leaders, such as General van Overstraeten, military adviser to the King of Belgium or Minister Van Zuylen. And even that of General Winterbotham, head of the British Intelligence Services, concerning Enigma.

Ditto for the work of Anglo-Saxon historians denouncing the real war aims of certain American and British interest groups.

Throughout the world hundreds of works by Historians remain deliberately ignored

I am thinking in particular of those who, in the 1960s, looked into the real role of the German Democratic generals who, since Hitler’s accession to power, informed the Allied Intelligence Services of the smallest, most secret decisions taken by the Führer. .

So to the works of Mrs. Pierre Accoce and Pierre Quet concerning the Roessler network, entitled: The war was won in Switzerland and published by Perrin in 1965; as well as: It was called A 54 written by Mrs C. Amort and I.M. Jedlicka, published by Robert Laffont in 1966, which both describe precisely the way in which the Allies were informed of all the details of the Manstein Plan at the same time from March 10, 1940. And as for the date of the attack: from April 31!

This information, qualified by the Allied SRs as coming from extremely reliable sources, was concealed in all the so-called “historical” works to make way for the official thesis of the “blindness” of the Allied leaders, and other preposterous theories based on surprise effect”.

I am also thinking of all the testimonies from the period and works by historians concerning the state of the finances of the Reich and the pitiful reality of the German army.

And it will be understood that starting from these totally false bases, it was not very difficult to impose an “incomprehensible” thesis on the Peoples dumbfounded by so much incapacity on the Allied side, and so many brilliant initiatives on the German side!

Finally, knowing that these multiple betrayals, just like the real context and the issues mentioned above, are still actively hidden by ALL the States concerned, here is the ultimate proof of a will imposed on the Peoples beyond the borders to preserve the secret about this “strange defeat”.

Read more

To put an end to the conspiracy theory

To put an end to the “conspiracy theory”

To put an end to the “conspiracy theory”

“When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness”,

Alexis de Tocqueville

We affirm that it is now possible to put an end to the “theory” and even to clearly demonstrate that there was indeed a plot and that it remains relevant. That all the conspiratorial theses, whatever their name: Elders of Zion, Illuminati, Rosicrucian, Synarchy, Jewish or Freemason conspiracy, and other Lemurian scarecrows only exist, and are blown up by the media, only to better hide the one and only conspiracy of which historians have proof:

The one organized by certain powers of money throughout the 20th century and until our days, to impose the wars which made it possible to plunder the resources of so many countries.

Indeed, the French military betrayal, which in itself would be only a banal historical event because they abound in our History, opens another question much more important for our 21st century: Why certain French patriots, often even republicans, did they wanted this reversal of alliance to associate with the Nazi Reich?

And this is where we come in, since while waiting for the works to appear to finally inform the Peoples about this essential part of their history, we are now offering you to take note of the major economic issues which, alone, could bring such “incomprehensible” decisions…

All information also developed on our YouTube channel, while waiting for the works on the question, currently in the writing phase, to be available for sale.

Our YouTube channel


The war aims of the great Empires

L’historiographie mondiale nous présente les conflits du 20ème siècle comme le résultat de tensions entre pays.
Or, rien de plus faux, puisque les deux premières Guerres mondiales ainsi que la Guerre froide qui suivit, résultent d’une confrontation entre les deux grands Empires dominants : France et Angleterre ; et les trois émergeants : États-Unis, Russie et Allemagne.

Le premier de ces conflits, déclenché en 1914, répondait à une triple préoccupation des empires britannique et américain :

1° Never allow the formation of a continental European alliance. And for that to prevent the rapprochement of France, Germany and Russia.

2° In this order of idea, it was necessary to stop the development of trade by rail uniting each day more the continent, since the beginning of the “industrial era”.
Indeed, France had built the Trans-Siberian railway line with Russia, which offered to transport goods faster and more cheaply than by sea, from Europe to China and India. Two countries considered as the “preserve” of the British Empire.
At the same time, Germany, an ally of the Ottoman Empire, was building another railway linking Berlin to Basra, thus giving it access to the fabulous Iranian oil deposits.
Oil supplying Her Majesty’s fleet and which, if it fell into German hands, would have directly competed with the two largest oil companies of the beginning of the century: Mr. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil and the British magnate’s Royal Dutch Shell Deterding, respectively master of Wall Street and the City of London.

3° Germany was building a merchant fleet capable of exporting goods from its ultra-modern factories to South America and even the United States. Equally intolerable prospect for Wall Street.

The Second World War took up these commercial and geopolitical fundamentals, while admitting other parameters directly concerning the large Wall Street cartels.
Indeed, the extraordinary profits brought to them by the First World War, during which they had been able to export raw materials, war material and supplies which England and France could no longer produce, had enabled them to place the Wall Street stock exchange in the first place of the world economy. A lucrative market to which the victory of 1918 put an end.
We therefore understand all the interest they could have in provoking a second one just as profitable and even, if possible, a little more…

War as Remedy

And it is here that the fundamentals of the “international conspiracy” appear, which we will nevertheless easily understand, as they are logical.
The whole thing can be summed up in five steps:

  • 1° After the German defeat of 1918, the victorious countries obtained as war compensation, at the same time the colonies of the defeated countries, the industrial patents, certain large industries, and as many deposits of raw materials.
  • 2° To manage this manna, these victorious States resold these goods at miserable prices to their biggest trusts. They therefore found themselves not only with a huge mass of new businesses to manage, but also with the responsibility of keeping them running to avoid a recession.
  • 3° The climate of the early 1920s being at world peace, companies throughout the European continent therefore began to produce equipment for civilian use, with the consequence of considerable overproduction leading to fierce competition not only between European countries but also with American companies unable to curb imports from ruined countries where the cost price was much lower.
  • 4° The result was a violent recession culminating in the great stock market and economic crash begun in 1927 in Germany and culminating in the world crisis of 1929.
  • 5° And we understand better why the big global cartels, having of course foreseen from the beginning of the 1920s that this obligation to maintain their oversized companies to meet the needs of the Great War could only lead to this infernal spiral, s logically oriented towards the only market capable of absorbing such a production capacity: A new war.

Indeed, at a time when the joys of the consumer society had not yet reached the people accustomed to a simple and rural way of life, how could a housewife be asked to buy 100 saucepans, when two or three were enough for her? widely.
On the other hand, the war market, involving the destruction of the material produced as it left the factories and the consumption of raw materials in a just-in-time fashion, was the only conceivable outcome in order to avoid mass unemployment, ruin. savings, and even a possible world revolution in order to put an end to this frantic race towards overconsumption.

The control of the cartels on the world

The maneuver took place in two stages.

First, as early as 1917, American cartels began to funnel their huge profits from the European war into the economy of the first empire to collapse: Russia.
Maneuver repeated in 1920, with the unconditional surrender of the Austro-Hungarian and German empires, by investing essentially in all the heavy industries and natural resources of Eastern European countries.

Massive investments imitated this time by the English and French cartels.

Then, in order to create the conditions essential to a new conflict, they worked, from 1922 by certain secret clauses of the Treaty of Rapallo, to secretly rearm the two great losers: Germany and Russia.

Knowing that ruined Russia should have used all its energy to raise its ruins and that Germany, in the same state of disrepair, had moreover been forbidden to rearm, the malevolent intention is established.

This Anglo-Saxon initiative was immediately followed by the major continental European cartels, unconcerned about being left behind in this rearmament race.
So while the Wall Street cartels – supported by those of the City of London in Germany – were rearming future dictatorships, continental Europeans were rearming democracies.

And we begin to understand how all this will degenerate for the greater benefit of each other.

The birth of Europe

Faced with this new distribution of the cards of the world economy, the countries of continental Europe organized themselves in order to avoid a new devastating war.

Driven by the Peoples, European cartels and organizations of veterans and peace-loving activists united in a new project: The creation of the United States of Europe.

Project supported by the League of Nations and the governments of the various nations concerned, with France and Germany in the forefront, which led to a first concrete result on September 30, 1926, with the first version of a European Union bringing together the cartels steel. Initiative soon followed by all the other cartels: nitrogen, coal, electricity, etc.

This first European Union, much “forgotten” by theoreticians of the incomprehensible, had two declared objectives:

  • Give Europe a republican Constitution based on the great principles of the Enlightenment society and humanism.
  • Combat the infiltration of Wall Street into its economy.

So of course, one can wonder why the big European cartels seemed indifferent to this degradation clearly announcing a new conflict. However, it would have been easy for them to denounce the secret rearmament of Germany before the League of Nations and put an end to the escalation.

And the answer is obvious: Because they too were counting on profiting from the promised manna, not only by manufacturing the weapons of the democracies, but by supplying Germany with the raw materials of which its mixed-capital factories were sorely lacking. .

Which they did shamelessly. And we understand better now why the “family secret” was able to prevail for so long…

The ideological pretext

To fuel the desired conflict, and because it is essential to correctly manipulate the Peoples before asking them to be complacently killed to enrich a few “powerful”, the same cartelist interests undertook to first finance the Russian Communist Party by offering to Stalin and his friends the financing and support necessary for them to seize power.

Then they supported by various contracts the economy of the USSR, before acting in the same way in Germany by bringing Hitler to power and by supporting the economy of the Reich until bringing it to a semblance of power, apparently convincing enough to claim to threaten the USSR.

Communism, entirely financed and installed in power by Wall Street, therefore very naturally opposed fascism, supported by the same interests.

It was under these auspices that republican democratic Europe was finally forced to give way to a fascist Europe, while generalized rearming emerged from the shadows to take over the entire space of international relations.

Another great “forgotten” of complacent historians: French military treason, which today can be considered as the “keystone” of this Great Lie of the 20th century.
Indeed, without this essential piece of the puzzle, it was easy to set aside the major economic issues to seem interested only in political issues, therefore in this fable that was: “The struggle of the Powers of Good against those of Evil”.

The Blitzkrieg Theory

Based, as we have seen, on an uninterrupted series of incomprehensible coincidences and decisions, or a series of “miracles”, this theory of illogicality deliberately “forgets” to recall that:

1° Hitler’s army was much inferior in quality and quantity to that aligned by the Allies:

Here are the latest figures unanimously accepted by historians concerning the forces present on May 10, 1940, the day of the German attack in the west:

  • 135 German divisions, against 151 Allied divisions.
  • 7,378 German guns against 14,000 for the allies.
  • 2,439 German tanks against 4,204 Allied tanks.
  • 3,864 German aircraft against 4,900 Allied aircraft

Knowing that the German material was not superior to the allied material, but in general inferior, in particular for the tanks, and that the German army had at the time of attacking the great empires of the west, only for one month gasoline and ammunition.

Knowing on the other hand that the allies had been informed as early as March 10, 1940 by many informants – including five of the generals closest to the Führer – of all the details of the so-called “Manstein” invasion plan definitively adopted on February 17 , and the date and time of the attack as early as April 31.

How can we imagine that the Allied General Staff could have been both destitute of equipment and “surprised” by a revolutionary strategy, as the States version claims (always in the plural)?


It is by carefully keeping these various data in memory that everyone will be able to follow the detailed explanations that we offer you on our YouTube channel.

No doubt they will be enough to give you an “intimate conviction” about this military betrayal and the major issues that motivated it, before our forthcoming books offer you the archives, testimonies and work of the best researchers who have worked on this major subject, often for more than twenty years…

Ici lien vers la page suivante : On vous explique

Join the associations of artists and citizens

Join the associations of artists and citizens

Subscribe to our Newsletter to be informed of the latest progress and upcoming meetings, signing sessions, history cafés, etc.

Newsletter Sign-Up

Click here

The Angry Historians are not a structured association, but a communication tool, a platform through which we can express ourselves, according to the principles so well laid down by Barthélémy Saint-Hilaire:

“In a democracy, you need absolute freedom to express what you think. The citizen owes to the fatherland the fruit of his meditations. Socrates spends his life, and finally risks it, advising his fellow citizens, who hit him without discouraging him. The only limits to advice and criticism are the very peace of the City and the existence of the State; This is why freedom of the press holds such a place in all modern states which, in becoming free, come closer and closer to the model government of democracy. »

True Democracy – Barthélémy Saint-Hilaire

And we are well aware of our isolation. But our job is to research, to do the work of an ant, of a “bookworm”, and we devote all our time to that.

This is why we do not have time to organize the meetings, however essential, that we would like to have with you.

Fortunately, thanks to the countless people who have already supported us for twenty years, some associative projects are underway.

They will allow each interested person to join us and participate in the actions they will propose.

While waiting to be able to subscribe to their News Letter, and in order to keep you informed of these events, find us on the site of the Éditions du Mouton noir which will give you the dates of the next signing sessions, and other “Cafés d’Histoire where you can meet us.

Mouton noir editions

The proofs of the theft of General Gamelin’s archives by the French Government

The proofs of the theft of General Gamelin’s archives by the French Government

General Gamelin’s personal archives, including the Journal de Marche du Cabinet Gamelin, made up of several volumes representing approximately 3,000 pages, in which he had noted his day-to-day activities until his dismissal, suffered the same fate as thousands of compromising archives since his notebooks and personal diaries contained in two large trunks, were stolen in the absence of his wife, by an officer sent by the Ministry of Defense, less than an hour after the death of General Gamelin at the Val de Grâce hospital – and even before Mme Gamelin was notified – this was just before the officers of the Vincennes archives could come and affix the seals to the doors of the accommodation.

Among the many witnesses to this theft, General de Cossé Brissac, in charge at the time of the Army archives, wrote a letter for the British historian Martin Alexander, summarizing the facts quite well.

Other witnesses, including the son of General Petibon, aide-de-camp to the Generalissimo, and Colonel Le Goyet, another guardian of the archives and author of a well-known biography of the Generalissimo entitled Le Mystère Gamelin, attested to the existence of these documents.

Let’s start with how General de Cossé Brissac presented the facts:


Letter of April 6, 1983 from General de Cossé Brissac to Mr. Martin Alexander of the History Department of the University of Southampton, following the theft of the Journal de marche du Cabinet Gamelin.

Mr Doctor,

I received your substantial letter of March 23, 1983. I know your high historical qualifications and I am very honored that Mr. Jean Vanwelkenhuyzen reported my name to you.

I read you with great attention and interest. This reading inclines me to admit the probability of the existence, then the disappearance, of a “Journal de marche” of Cabinet Gamelin.

I effectively headed the Army Historical Service at the Château de Vincennes, from 1953 to 1966 – on the death of the late Xavier de Virieu.

To my great regret, I cannot give you testimony different from that of Lieutenant-Colonel Le Goyet and Lieutenant Cadilhon, then in charge of our contemporary section, who took charge of the general’s documents, after the seals were lifted.

I remember having learned, quite by chance, from an unofficial source, the seizure of General Gamelin’s archives, at his home, by a team that I suppose was ministerial, immediately after the general’s death at the hospital in the Val de Grace. Death that the General was still unaware of.

Shocked by the brutality and incorrectness of such a process, I then had it at heart to let the Gamelin family know that our Historical Service was foreign to this measure.
I myself attended the general’s funeral at Val de Grace. When the seized papers were handed over to Lieutenant-Colonel Le Goyet, representative of the Historical Service, I reiterated to the family my concern to satisfy any requests they may have, within the framework of our regulations.

Lieutenant-Colonel Le Goyet reported to me, at the time, on the lifting of the seals which he had attended and on the inventory of the documents received, then drawn up by him.

I’m sure there was no trace of the March Diary, which you assume not without reason, the existence, then the disappearance.

I admit that your presentation makes me regret today not having shown more curiosity.

It is true that my previous work on the Second World War had mainly oriented me towards the German archives, and very little towards those of the former generalissimo.

Above all, we must not forget the circumstances that closely followed the death of General Gamelin: The collapse of a regime, the appearance of a new power with all the changes of teams, following this complete governmental renovation.

You will not be surprised, I hope, that I entrust the delivery of this letter to my friend and distant successor, General Delmas, who must not be unaware of its content.

Charles de Cosse Brissac


Excerpt from Volume No. 6 of the series The Great Lie of the 20th Century: The End of the Mysteries?

The Gamelin’s “papers”

“On January 21, 1958, General Gamelin, following a bad fall, was hospitalized in Val de Grâce. He is nearly eighty-six years old and his condition is serious. In his little room he will live three months of long agony. (-) He died on April 18 and Mrs. Gamelin had the painful surprise, on returning from Val de Grace, to find that the seals were affixed to the general’s office at her home, 55 avenue Foch in Paris. The Minister of National Defence, through the police commissioner of the 16th arrondissement, strictly enforced the regulatory texts (affixing seals). Colonel Consigny represented the Minister. »

We now know the exact circumstances of this “regulatory” application of the seals, since Colonel Consigny, who had had the apartment opened to him by the concierge in the absence of Mme Gamelin, was the only one who could have stolen the Journal walk and the general’s personal notebooks just before they are put down.

It was therefore only on June 4, nearly two months after the affixing of these seals, that Colonel Le Goyet took possession of what remained of the general’s archives: “On April 30, 1958, a ministerial decision prescribed Army Historical Service to assist a military magistrate in unsealing and recovering documents belonging to the Departments of National Defense and Foreign Affairs. I am designated to accomplish this mission, Lieutenant Cadilhon and Chief Warrant Officer Brun accompany me. The operation took place on June 4, 1958, in the presence of Magistrate Colonel Jallut, the 3rd class steward Falcout, the police commissioner of the 16th arrondissement in uniform, Madame Gamelin, two family members and an attorney. Everything is disorder… Papers taken out of drawers are scattered, others are piled up on the ground, others in dusty canteens… In silence we begin the first sorting. After an hour, I intervene with Colonel Jallut and suggest that he transport everything to Vincennes to the Historical Service of the Army with the agreement of Mrs. Gamelin and General de Cossé-Brissac. After having received the assurance that all papers that are strictly personal, or that have no historical interest, will be returned to her, and after having taken the advice of her solicitor, Mme Gamelin accepts. All the documents are boxed and loaded into a van. End of quote (Le Goyet The Gamelin Mystery page 369, 370, 371).

Thus, starting from the principle that a man in charge of collecting, studying, then classifying the archives of a general having commanded in chief cannot ignore the importance of his Journal de marche and his personal notebooks which are the major pieces , how to explain that this senior official, in his biography of General Gamelin, does not mention their disappearance???

That he is content, without further comment, to report the presence of Colonel Consigny on April 18?
That he does not mention Mrs Gamelin’s complaints to General de Cossé Brissac and the latter’s letter of apology formally acknowledging the theft perpetrated before the affixing of the seals, then prefers to describe the generalissimo’s office completely put upside down by this hasty excavation, as if it were the normal state of the place?
As for the reason for which he was chosen to see to the classification and proper recording of these archives, certain gossips, after noting the zeal with which he contributed to the writing of the official Bible, were able to see in it an excellent means of to filter these documents again, in case some pieces could have escaped Colonel Consigny, sent by Mr. Chaban Delmas at that time Minister of War in the government of Mr. Félix Gaillard.

The reader will therefore not be surprised that the recordings and reports written during the day of May 15, 1940 following the betrayal of the Georges – Billotte tandem, have also “disappeared” from the history of this battle, or that the testimonies and reports of “Sedan Ghost Tanks” being altered or “blowing away”.

Ultimately, and regardless of this new historical sleight of hand, one thing is certain: This testimony gives us the assurance that all the documents on this battle, stolen or not, and in particular those concerning the role that the Generalissimo held there, are currently in the possession of the French State, since General Gamelin took good care to specify that he was able to dispose of all his archives in order to write his Souvenirs: “In particular, I must review closely a whole series of notes carefully recorded day by day, by myself or by my staff. (-) I took care to accompany my notes and memoirs with all the supporting documents that I could find in the archives of my former private staff. I wanted these documents to be filed in the trial file. Well took it from me, because some of them were destroyed by the military authorities who had custody of them, (emphasis mine) when the Germans entered the free zone on November 11, 1942 “

Decidedly, it seems to be a mania for destroying archives among our military, and we now understand when these “authorities” were able to destroy all the documents having any connection with the information provided by Roessler and the others.

Morotte of the destruction that Gamelin must have known since: “fortunately I had double the essential originals. (-) My archives have been carefully preserved, almost complete, but I had to put them away as long as France was occupied by the Germans. There are also facts, or opinions, which it is better to expose only with a certain distance and when the passions aroused by the crises we are going through have lost their acuity. »
End of quote (Gamelin Servir Tome 1 Introduction page II)

And the report is clear… Apparently the “passions” are not cooled.

Knowing that the double of these documents was destroyed by the French when the Germans entered the free zone on November 11, 1942, and that it is appropriate to add to all these “unfortunate” disappearances the thousands of archives seized by the “allies Anglo-Saxons” who, according to my personal conclusions, still serve to exert the blackmail essential to the maintenance of the “family secret”, one will not be surprised at the ease with which the thesis of illogicality was able to impose itself.

Economic and geopolitical questions left unanswered by official history

Economic and geopolitical questions left unanswered by official history

“We believe we are dying for our country: we are dying for industrialists.”

Anatole France,   L’Humanité, July 18, 1922

This elementary truth, so deeply felt by the Peoples and fought so much by the media under the pretext of conspiracy theory, has, to be demonstrated, only to take into account the facts and archives, and especially the strange “blanks” left by the theoreticians of the absurd.

In reality, each of us suspects that deliberately excluding economic issues from history is indicative of the desire to cover our tracks. We all know that we have to look for “who benefits from the crime”!

Questions still unanswered in 2021

What the general public, on the other hand, does not know is the extraordinary violence with which these state lies are imposed.

Thus, in 2021, and if we only consider the period 1919-1945, the answers to the following questions, although known to experts and historians, have still not been provided to the general public:

  • Why have the “experts” of all persuasions “forgotten” that the rearmament of Germany, begun in the USSR in 1923, under the secret clauses of the Treaty of Rapallo, was financed and carried out by English banks and trusts and Americans who had massively invested in German and Soviet industry?
  • How is it that the gigantic arms complexes “secretly” set up in the USSR by these same companies were able to build, between 1922 and 1934, and this in complete violation of international treaties, munitions, bombs, chemical weapons, planes, guns, tanks, warships, and other submarines, which Hitler was going to use from 1937, to carry out his campaigns?
  • Why do historians apparently attach no importance to what was, for more than 10 years, a flagrant violation of the Treaty of Versailles and a major attack on the policies of détente and disarmament carried out both by the League of Nations and by the pan-European movement of Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi?
  • How is it possible that a small inverted strike from the district of Schwäbing in Munich, without ideals, without culture and which had nothing of a warrior, came to power?
  • Why, when he had spent 4 years of war as a staff courier, far from the fighting, is Hitler still considered today, by many historians, as a “hero of the Great War”?
  • Why do the same historians forget his political commitment, when he was a soldier in the communist republic of Bavaria in 1920, elected convinced of a communist section in his regiment, and virulent to the point of being nicknamed “Addi the Red” ?
  • Why remove from any reasoning that the future leader of the Nazi party (NSDAP) denounced all his comrades, bringing them to the execution post, during the collapse of this republic, in order to save his life?
  • Why did he subsequently display such apparent hatred for Communism?
  • By virtue of what logic was it believed necessary to “forget” that he was put in charge by the leaders of the nationalist right of the secret services of the army, therefore of the big trusts – no doubt seduced by the capacities of exceptional adaptation of their new protege – to infiltrate the NSDAP, then to take the lead?
  • How was Hitler, then a simple political candidate with no personal fortune, able to finance the salaries and social contributions of a private army of 3 million men and the hundreds of meetings with great spectacles that made him famous, in a country ruined by its war debts and successive crises?
  • How is it that he was able to rearm Germany, remilitarize the Rhineland, carry out the Anschluss with Austria after having had its Chancellor assassinated, thus seizing gold reserves, armaments, raw materials? and Austrian factories, without firing a shot? All this with an army of operettas?
  • Which allowed him to support Franco militarily in Spain, thus opening up access to rare minerals from Spanish mines, then to seize Czechoslovakia and take control of its economy, without the great democratic powers lifting the little finger ?
    Why did the German Communist Party, following Stalin’s orders, help the Nazi Party to come to power by supporting it in three major elections?
    Why did Kurt von Schleicher, the “social general” who had presided, under the Weimar Republic, over the secret rearmament of Germany and the German-Soviet rapprochement, had he granted, on Stalin’s strong advice, forty million marks to the Nazis, in order to finance Hitler’s electoral campaign, while the party was on the verge of bankruptcy? Was his assassination during the Night of the Long Knives the way to make an embarrassing witness disappear?
  • How is it conceivable that commercial exchanges, and in particular the manufacture of arms by German factories on Soviet territory, continued between the USSR and the Nazi Reich, yet declared enemies since 1933?
  • Why did Stalin secretly initiate a rapprochement with the Third Reich, as early as 1935, when officially Hitler presented himself as the champion of the anti-communist struggle?
  • Why did Stalin eliminate from his army and his government all opponents of this rapprochement during the “bloody purges” of 1937?
  • Why did Heydrich and the Nazi secret services help him in this task, in particular by fabricating the false documents which would enable Marshal Tukhachevsky and the other supporters of an Anglo-Soviet alliance to be sentenced to death?
  • Why did German technicians and engineers continue to work secretly in the USSR, in German and Anglo-Saxon factories and companies, after Hitler came to power?
  • Why did the French government, also perfectly aware of Germany’s secret rearmament since 1923, do nothing to combat it?
  • Why did the great Lorraine metallurgists, even the most indomitable adversaries of Germany, like Mr. de Wendel, continue to supply their German counterparts Krupp or Thyssen, even after the Nazis took power, with all the steel necessary for manufacture their weapons, and this until 1939?
  • Why was the good quality coal that these steelworks needed delivered under the same conditions and without the slightest restriction, by the English industrialists?
  • Why did Sweden not apply any limits on the export of its steel?
  • Why did England and the United States act, as early as 1920, to politically isolate France and free themselves from the military commitments made to her, leaving their “Ally” alone in the face of the German danger?
  • Why was the “little alliance” uniting France and the Balkan countries, or even the Franco-Russian alliance, diplomatically opposed by the British?
  • Why did the English stubbornly refuse to consider an alliance with Russia from 1917 to 1939?
  • How is it that, a few days before the signing of the disastrous Treaty of Munich, Chamberlain, perfectly informed three times by the German generals that Hitler was going to be assassinated and the Nazi party decapitated, rushed into a plane, without even consult his own government, to land in Berlin and thus save, in full knowledge of the facts, the life of the dictator?
  • How have historians of all persuasions been able to dismiss from their reasoning that a few days before the invasion of Czechoslovakia, when the Prague Stock Exchange was logically collapsing, the world’s largest trusts rushed to buy back the shares of the largest Czech banks and companies?
  • That this process enriches in the same way the same “vulture” trusts, at the time of the other Hitlerian conquests?
  • That the investments of the German subsidiary of Unilever, a British industrial giant, increased from 20 million pounds sterling in 1930 to 37 million in 1939 and that the most intense period of investment corresponds very exactly to the takeover of Jewish companies, after the ‘Anschluss, then to the “Munich coup”, finally to that of Prague?
  • Why do historians omit to recall that France, the second colonial power after the British Empire, had been since the end of the 1920s the second world financial power, that it had the largest gold reserve after the United States? United, and in 1939 the most powerful army in Europe?
  • Why, when the Banque de France had been coming to the aid of the pound sterling in the midst of a debacle for years, did the British Minister of Finance decide, two days after having begged his French counterparts to buy back a few more million pounds , to devalue its currency, causing the Banque de France to lose millions of gold francs in one weekend?
  • Why did England rearm only partially and late, thus forcing France to rearm in 1932, and therefore to weaken its finances?
  • Why did the British government sign, in 1935, without consulting its French allies, a naval treaty allowing Hitler to rebuild a war fleet, again in complete contradiction with the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles?
  • Why do we still let the general public believe that the German army was perfectly armed and at the cutting edge of technology, when the Reich could no longer finance its rearmament program since 1937?
  • Why did Stalin sign the German-Soviet agreement with such haste in August 1939, when he was well aware that, a few weeks later, Hitler’s attack on Poland should have been postponed for several months? because of the onset of winter rains? – Could it be because this “unfortunate haste” allowing the forces of the Reich to surprise the Poles in their mobilization, at the same time took the French by surprise in their effort of rearmament, and gave the Nazis the possibility of seizing the factories? and Polish weapons in order to complete their armament for the famous “Blitzkrieg”?
  • Why did Stalin refuse, in 1941, for almost 24 hours, to believe in the German attack on his country, until he received the official declaration of war?
  • Why did Hitler attack the USSR by refusing to carry out an anti-Bolshevik campaign, which would have ensured him the support of the population and the enrollment of anti-Communist Russian divisions, if his objective was really to eradicate communism?
  • Why do historians so easily “forget” the two betrayals committed against Czechoslovakia, then Poland, by the British and French governments? Two countries to which they were bound by numerous treaties giving all guarantees of military intervention, in the event of a German attack…
  • Why have we erased from official history the beginnings of a Europe officially founded in Brussels by the steel, coal and chemical cartels on September 30, 1926?
  • Why, in 2021, are the experts still silent about the cartelization of the entire European economy and the distribution of the areas of influence of each of these cartels in the world?
  • Why was the role played by these same European cartels in the 1920s and 1930s also kept secret in order to protect themselves from industrial competition from the United States and to ensure the political independence of Europe in the face of American demands? ?
  • Why do historians continue to claim that the “Prague coup” of March 15, 1939, determined Chamberlain to have no further dealings with Hitler, when in July of the same year, less than two months before the outbreak of the hostilities, his principal adviser, Wilson, and his trade minister Hudson, negotiated a loan of one billion pounds sterling to the Nazi Reich, (that is to say 200 billion pounds sterling in present value), the abandonment of the guarantees given to Poland , and the distribution of reciprocal zones of influence in the world?

Zones of influence” corresponding to those of the cartels in charge of creating the “new world order”.

  • Why did Montagu Norman, both President of the Bank of England and Director of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), deliver Czechoslovakia’s central bank gold to Hitler, when nothing was there? obliged, and this in complete disagreement with the conventions signed with this State?
  • Why was this same Montagu Norman never worried, when he was, throughout the 1930s, the unfailing support of Hjalmar Schacht, declared Nazi and President of the Reichsbank, who organized the currency and the economy of a Reich, then in full rearmament?
  • Why do historians see Herman Goering as an extravagant drug addict, when between 1934 and 1939 he became one of the richest men in the world with his cartel the “Herman Goering Werke?” »

A global cartel, with multiple international ramifications, of which there is curiously no trace in historiography.

  • Why have we “forgotten” that the greatest French industrialists delivered the steel and the raw materials essential to the rearmament of the Nazi Reich until the declaration of war?
  • Why does this amnesia also concern the so-called “neutral” countries which participated in the same way in this massive rearmament?
  • How is it that the proxies of the main leaders of the largest American trusts found themselves at the head of the German war industries? This both in the USSR from 1923 where thousands of deportees from the Gulags would die in their factories, and later in Nazi Germany, in the very heart of the concentration camps, where again thousands of deportees would die to enrich the shareholders. of these firms?

I am talking here about Ford Germany, IG Farben, IBM, General Motors (Opel), ITT, AEG and hundreds of other officially “German” factories but with 80% or 100% American capital whose the interests were often very strongly linked to the Cartel Herman Goering Werke and whose members of the boards of directors were called, among others, Bush and Kennedy, respectively fathers and grandfather of three Presidents of the United States.

  • Why fail to recall that the future President Roosevelt made a fortune in the 1920s by creating an investment agency for American funds in Germany?
  • Why were Messrs. Dawes and Young chosen to draw up the economic aid plans for Germany when they belonged to certain management committees of the major American cartels already mentioned?
  • Why was 80% of the capital allocated to Germany under these Dawes and Young plans actually allocated to these same American companies, themselves associated with the giant Cartel: Herman Goering Werke?
  • How can we explain that, as soon as Hitler came to power in 1933, the United States increased its oil deliveries to the Hitler Reich in full rearmament, quadrupling these deliveries between 1933 and 1939, if not to allow their arms factories to operate at full capacity?
  • Why did J.P. Morgan, the most powerful banker on Wall Street, choose John Foster Dulles, at that time a lawyer for IG Farben and who in 1926 would be executive director of Sullivan and Cromwell, the law firm of all the American cartels, to organize the establishment of these trusts at the heart of the European economy?
  • Why did Hjalmar Schacht, Hitler’s finance minister in charge of financing the “miracle” of German rearmament, remain in constant contact with J.F. Dulles throughout his mandate?
  • Why was the brother of the latter, Alan Dulles, appointed head of the American secret services in Switzerland, if not to ensure in the shadows the smooth running of commercial relations between the USA and the Reich?
  • How could we “forget” that IBM New York (with 100% American management and capital) supplied the Nazis from 1934, then throughout the conflict, with the punched cards, the computers and the necessary technicians to identify and file the Jews (going back to the 4th generation), or even the opponents and the mentally and physically handicapped, promised to sterilization or elimination?
  • That these machines, rented by IBM at exorbitant prices from the Reich, and used in the heart of the concentration camps, were essential elements in the proper management and application of the Shoa?
  • That these same computers made it possible at the same time to list and file all the industrial, commercial and private wealth of the occupied countries, in order to organize their systematic looting, to organize the logistics of the army down to the smallest detail, or even the files of the Gestapo and the various services of repression and control of the German people…

A totally impossible task without IBM machines and the very foundation of the mythical German “efficiency”.

  • Why on December 13, 1941, only two days after the Reich’s declaration of war on the United States, did Roosevelt issue, very discreetly, a presidential decree allowing American companies to circumvent the embargo on the Nazi Reich, in order to that they can continue to do business with the Axis countries, as with the neutral countries living on good terms with these same enemy countries, on condition that they have a special authorization?
  • What logic followed American investments in Germany when they soared from $450 million when war broke out in 1939 to $475 million when Germany declared war on the United States in December 1941? That same year, 553 American affiliates worked for Nazi Germany.
  • Why in the fall of 1941 did the New York Stock Exchange steadily rise as it became increasingly clear that the Nazi “lightning war” in the east was not going to end in victory?
  • Why the role of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), headed by an American, which launders gold from the banks of occupied states, the proceeds of looting, dental gold, or jewelry from concentration camps, is it still hidden to this day?
  • Why does official history forget to recall the role played by some of the largest American banks, such as Chase Manhattan or J.P. Morgan, as well as that of Swiss banks, in the repatriation of the profits made by these companies? weapons during the war?
  • Why were the BRI, like all the large Swiss, American, English, French, Dutch etc. private banks, which participated in this systematic plunder of Europe for the benefit of the large international trusts, not worried?
  • How is it conceivable, when Berlin was bombarded in July 1940 by British heavy bombers, that no German arms factory with American capital, although located within their radius of action, was affected and that those they were able to continue to produce the armament necessary for the Reich, throughout the duration of the war, contributing at the same time to prolonging the war against the USSR?…
    Who will explain why, when Hitler had sent Churchill, in May 1941, a peace proposal providing for: A general disarmament, at the same time as the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of all German forces from the occupied countries, then the return democratic governments and free elections – this one was hidden from all the Allies by the British Prime Minister?
  • In the same vein, why was Rudolf Hess arrested as soon as he arrived? Then put incommunicado and held prisoner until his murder in Spandau prison in 1987, a few weeks before his release?
  • How is it that after the war, the few Cartels who suffered damage in the last months of the conflict, such as General Motors, or other large American companies, not only remained unpunished, but received compensation for the rare damage suffered by their German subsidiaries, following the British or American raids?

Compensation paid by governments, therefore taxpayers, German, French, or American…

  • How is it possible that IG Farben, which produced the ammunition, gasoline and rubber necessary for the German army throughout the war, IBM, Ford and General Motors (Opel) which built the tanks and trucks, or even ITT, which supplies all the electrical equipment, were able to resume their activities at the end of the war, in their factories intact, to participate in the reconstruction of Europe and the start of the Cold War?
  • How to explain that the Americans, who nevertheless had the possibility of landing in Europe from 1943, waited until 1944 and the inevitable victory of Russia, to engage in the West?
  • Why did they prefer to land in North Africa and the Middle East in 1942, if not to secure Iranian and Iraqi oil and access routes to Syria and North Africa, while blocking a possible Soviet advance towards this area? rich in oil?
  • Why is the Chinese and Eastern issue, essential for American tankers, as for the British Empire, so often “forgotten” by historians?
  • Why is the animosity between the USA and the British Empire in the 1920s and 1930s, particularly with regard to the same oil issues, completely concealed, when it was on the verge of degenerating into armed conflict?
  • Why were the largest French refineries all bombed and destroyed by the Anglo-Saxons, when they had no more oil to refine for a long time?
  • Why did the “experts” of all persuasions so easily “forget” the reception given at the Waldorf Astoria in New York on June 26, 1940, the day of France’s defeat? Rejoicings attended besides the German trade delegation, led by Gehrard Westrick: Mr. Edsel, the son of Henry Ford, representing the Ford factories. Representatives of General Motors, IBM, General Electric, Eastman Kodak, ITT, Standard Oil, accompanied by their lawyer in Germany. James D. Mooney, head of foreign investments at General Motors and its CEO, Alfred P. Sloan, who had this “good word” which we will admit reflected the thoughts of all the guests: “The democratic countries of the world have unintelligent leaders. No… Stupid, and short-sighted… So it’s only natural that democracies have to pack up when an alternative system comes along with leaders who are strong, smart, aggressive, who make people work longer and more actively and who have gangster instinct. And, indeed, it seems that now the democracies are no longer in the race. Five days later, the Nazi victory was again celebrated with great pomp, again at the Waldorf, this time by Rieber, big boss of Texaco and great friend of the fascists, Germans, Europeans and Americans. Once again, we saw the elite of international high finance crowding there, celebrating this economic windfall, this new advance in their European interests…


  • Why, for 70 years, have the secret services, mainly English, destroyed thousands of compromising documents? Murdered (sorry, you probably had to say “suicided”) key witnesses and maintained a leaden screed on the truth?
  • How is it that the attack on Pearl Harbor could have been a “surprise” for the American navy, when the British cipher services knew perfectly and without the slightest possible doubt the place of the attack, and this two days in advance?
  • Why was the “Octagon System” that allowed the CIA and ex-Nazis to exfiltrate the Nazi war chest so carefully camouflaged to this day?
  • What was the role of Chancellor Adenauer in the rearmament of Germany and the “Octagon” system, which used SS gold to finance his political party, the CDU, subservient to the USA?
  • Who wanted and started the Cold War? And why ?
  • Finally, why have those who write History for the Peoples so casually “forgotten” the warning issued on January 17, 1961, by President Eisenhower, when he was about to leave power, against the power of the military-industrial lobby: “We must be wary of unwarranted influence, whether intended or not, by the military-industrial complex. The risk of a fatal increase in the abuse of power exists and will persist. Let us never let the weight of this complex endanger our freedoms or our democracy. »
  • And this corollary question: Why was J.F. Kennedy assassinated when he was preparing, on the advice of President de Gaulle, to end the war in Vietnam?

Everyone will have understood it, I could continue this list on many pages, but I had promised to stick to the Second World War…

“We never lie as much as before the elections, during the war and after the hunt”, used to say Georges Clemenceau, and one observation is essential in 2021: The line remains correct, since the works published to date do not answer any of these questions in a synthetic way.

While the facts are perfectly known, the archives have been opened, the books written, the proponents of “Official History”, avoid criticizing them, modestly turning their eyes away from the work of their colleagues and the indisputable reality of the archives. , for lack of being able to mention them without compromising the interests of those who remain the “Masters of the Planet”, and whose names have shone continuously for more than a century, at the tops of the tallest buildings.

To these essential questions, which in turn generate so many others, the “experts” answer:

“Evil genius, reign of terror, fault of the German people, envoy of the Devil, racist ideology, incomprehensible madness, fatal illogicality” and other hazy explanations.

In reality, all this is a tall tale, by which the accredited authors accumulate honors and official recognition, because there has never been a war without, at its origin, a basely self-serving intention, a well-ordered financing, and a perfectly determined will.

No “fatality” has ever been taken into account, and the Second World War and its sixty-five million victims, did not break the rule, despite all the smokescreens that we fought to deploy for 70 years.

This is why the entire history of the 20th century can be summed up in two strong ideas:

  • The first is economic with the emergence of new economic powers and the opening of new markets. (Germany, Russia, China)
  • To manage them as well as possible, the big global trusts have organized themselves into cartels and have shared the planet in order to avoid competing with each other. Each cartel has its Zone of Influence.
  • It was in order to oppose the ever-increasing stake taken by Anglo-Saxon cartels in German companies that their European counterparts came together to try to put an end to the “infiltration” of their industries.
  • Hitler put himself at their head, thus defying his former Anglo-Saxon sponsors, and there was war.

  • The second major fact is social.
  • A new conception of social relations in opposition to old values ​​and conservative powers had appeared with the century.
  • Their spearhead: Communist and socialist ideas. Skilful maneuver orchestrated by big international “black” capital in order to order to their advantage the ideas of freedom, social justice and democracy. Because everything in economy, therefore in politics, is a matter of legitimacy, therefore manipulation of opinions and Peoples.
  • The third data is ideological, since it was necessary to find the pretexts able to mobilize Peoples already strongly tired by the First world war and having no desire to repeat the same errors.

This is why the Great Stateless black capital, tax evader and instigator of wars and revolutions of all kinds financed Communism and Fascism, two forces apparently contradictory, but only capable of blinding the Peoples made vulnerable by the economic disorders that succeeded the Great War.
It is these upheavals that will decide everything.

This is what we must remember if we want to understand why billions were invested in war material and why hundreds of millions of human beings were sacrificed, during the bloodiest century in history.



Click here

Our YouTube channel: we tell you everything

Our YouTube channel: we tell you everything

Before you jump in, let us walk you through how to navigate…

On our YouTube channel, you will find interviews and documentaries that will allow you to easily analyze the seven missing pieces of the puzzle.

All about new historical data

  • French military betrayal

    To choose films dealing with the french military betrayal

    > Click here

  • The War of the Empires

    To choose films dealing with the war of the Empires

    > Click here

  • Europe of cartels

    To choose films dealing with the Europe of the cartels

    > Click here

  • Betrayals of the Allies during the 2nd World War

    To choose the films dealing with the Betrayals of the Allies during the 2nd World War

    > Click here

All about our historians and our encounters

To get to know our historian friends

> Click here

The vox pops on military treason

> Click here

Artists support us

> Click here

The media block information

Media block information

Researchers, historians and other muzzled whistleblowers.

How to explain such a stranglehold on information?

Nowadays, we no longer burn forbidden books, yet curiously in our hyper-informed society, nothing is easier than making information disappear, simply by hiding it in the media.
To be convinced of this, it is enough to read the testimonies of the most recognized academics such as Antony C. Sutton, British economist and historian, researcher at Stanford and professor at UCLA who was one of the first, in the 1960s, to reveal the part played by American bankers and industrialists in Hitler’s accession to power and the war effort of the Third Reich, or Alice Teichova, professor at the University of East Anglia at Girton College in Cambridge and at the School of Economics and Political Science of London, who traced the British and European ramifications of the Nazi financial system in Europe, or Adam Tooze, a teacher at Yale, who revealed the truth about the German economy in the interwar period, Edwin Black who exposed IBM’s predominant role in the conduct of the war and the Holocaust, or Joseph Borkin who dared to attack the crimes of IG Farben, that is to say the Standard Oil company of J.D. Rockefeller Junior. All of them, like many of their “revisionist” university colleagues, had to undergo constant and varied pressures, as Sutton testifies:

“Despite their Constitution and its supposed constraints, the United States has become a quasi-totalitarian state. If the external signs of the dictatorship are not yet visible and the concentration camps and other agents of power knocking on our door at midnight are not our daily life, the critics of the establishment are nevertheless the object of threat. Actions are taken against them, such as the use of tax services to bring dissidents into line, or the manipulation of the Constitution by a judicial system subordinate to this elite. (-) Through publishing houses controlled by this same financial elite, embarrassing books go by the wayside and “useful” books are put forward. (-) The overall result of this manipulation of society by the Establishment has been the outbreak of four major wars in 60 years, a crushing national debt, the abandonment of the constitution, the suppression of freedom and opportunity , and the creation of a huge chasm of credibility between the man in the street and his political leaders.

Anthony Sutton

The transparent device of two main parties trumpeting artificial differences, conventions worthy of circus games, and the cliché of more partisan foreign policy, is no longer credible at all. And the financial elite, which itself recognizes that its policy does not win the support of the public, is obviously ready to go its own way, without the symbolic support of this public. The proofs brought by the revisionist historians constitute the stop of this debate, the bases of our accusations of subversion. Slowly, over decades, book after book, virtually line after line, the truth of recent history emerges as documents are published, examined, analyzed, and organized into a more valid historical framework. (Antony Sutton – Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler).

This text dates from 1976. However, forty years later the situation has not changed an inch, on the contrary getting worse. Thus, in 2013, in Canada this time, the historian Jacques Pauwels, of the University of Toronto, complained about the same obstacles silently opposed to the freedom of information by these few lines in conclusion of his book: “The history , that’s rubbish,” Henry Ford once said. Big Business has the money to get the books written and distributed widely. This work is put together by hand-picked authors whose companies can expect sympathy and understanding, and these authors know what is expected of them in return for lavish fees. In these books, therefore, there is usually no mention at all of potentially unpleasant themes. We can qualify these works as “antiseptics”. In the more or less official histories of large American companies, for example, there is almost never any mention of the role of their subsidiaries in Germany during the war. (-) Antiseptic studies have been produced on behalf of Ford, General Motors, Volkswagen, Krupp, Allianz, Daimler-Benz, Deutsche Bank, Degussa, Dresdner Bank, Flick and Bertelsmann. It is no coincidence that such authors have no difficulty in quickly finding a major publishing house willing to publish their work.
Jacques Pauwels

The overwhelming majority of large American and German publishing houses are either gigantic corporations and therefore bona fide members of Big Business, or owned by holding companies whose large corporations own large portfolios of shares. Manuscripts of critical studies are almost always refused by these publishers. Books in which delicate subjects are avoided, or skilfully justified, can on the other hand be found for weeks on end in the windows of large bookstores which, very often, are subsidiaries or associates of large publishing houses. Critical studies are generally difficult, if not impossible, to find in these bookstores. And this phenomenon is beginning to spread in Europe. Large publishing houses linked to big business, which publishes non-critical studies with large circulation, can afford this service. (Jacques Pauwels Big business with Hitler).

Which makes it possible to forget the recommendations of the most eminent representatives of this respectable profession:

“The writing of history consists of an endless revision of the past. The actual reality of history demands to be considered along with its possibilities” John Lukacs

“Any truth is good for the historian to say, even and especially that which upsets prejudices, clashes with received ideas or partisan interests.” Raymond Aron

And those of some reasonable men:

“Wherever chance seems to operate on the surface, it is always under the sway of hidden internal laws, and it is only a question of discovering them.” Friedrich Engels

For the real plot of the media and publishers under the orders of Big Black Capital was not to forbid revisionist historians and intellectuals to work, but to appear to be disinterested in their work, to relegate them to the dustbins of information and , at best, to only mention them in “elitist” television programs, or in documentaries broadcast at the most advanced hours of the night.

Because everyone has always known that:

“Whoever has control of the past,” said the Party’s slogan, “has control of the future.” Whoever has control of the present has control of the past” 1984 George Orwell

and that the “Lower People” must be kept in ignorance.

Questions left unanswered by “Blitzkrieg” theorists

Questions left unanswered by “Blitzkrieg” theorists

“The blitzkrieg relied on the existence of ‘helpful enemies’ who would not just make mistakes but the right mistakes. »
End of quote (D.E. Showalter 1940 French defeat, German victory under the eye of foreign historians page 38)

Or, in opposition to Mr. Frieser’s “incomprehensible” Blitzkrieg thesis, the basis for a proper betrayal…

Thus, the revelation of the French military betrayal of May-June 1940 makes it possible to lengthen the list of questions left unresolved by the accredited “experts”:

  • Why, since the opening of the archives of the Battle of France in the year 2000, have none of the historians who have established their reputation and published so many books on this battle suddenly given up writing on the subject?

  • Why did the French State not return, at the same time as these archives, all those it stole under Vichy and in the immediate post-war period?

  • Why has no investigation been carried out for eighty years concerning the infantrymen of the “special cagoulard sections” and their “ghost” tanks who attacked the French blockhouses on the heights of Sedan on May 13, 1940

  • Why were these blockhouses blown up during the occupation, if not to try to erase all traces of these reverse attacks?

  • Why did Hitler impose during the same period a “prohibited zone” extending from Sedan to Dunkirk, all along what was later called “the Panzer corridor”?

  • Prohibition which left hundreds of corpses to rot on the spot without being able to be buried!
    Could it be because some curious people could have discovered men and tanks there that had no business there?

  • Why were the main military leaders, all members or sympathizers of the Cagoule, at the origin of the collapse of the French armies in 1940, appointed to important positions under Vichy and decorated with the francisque?

  • Why was Pétain, perfectly identified by police investigations and the secret services as the secret leader of the Military Cagoule, cleared by Daladier who personally threw his file into the fire so that no trace of it remained?

  • Why was Marx Dormoy, Minister of the Interior of the Popular Front who had ordered these investigations into the Cagoulard plot, first arrested by Vichy, then assassinated by La Cagoule?

  • Why in Germany, after Nuremberg, did they rush to execute all those who could have testified?

  • Why in France, have we organized rigged trials, carried out with a bang by their former accomplices, and in some cases, as for Laval, by organizing real judicial assassinations, if not for the sole purpose of silencing those who would have had the opportunity to reveal a certain truth?

  • Why did we find, a few years after the war, many of Vichy’s collaborators, among the most culpable, in key positions in various state apparatuses of the Fifth Republic?

  • Why were hundreds of former Nazis elevated to equally important positions in Germany?

  • Why did the US Secret Service hire ex-Nazis after allowing them to escape the purge?

  • Why did none of the “Blitzkrieg theoreticians”, for eighty years, give the slightest credit to the works of French and foreign generals who clearly denounced military treason?

Finally, the ultimate question: If historians chose tomorrow to answer these questions, wouldn’t the understanding of the world in which we live be completely upset?

A brief review of the 20th century

A brief review of the 20th century

NOTE: The texts below are taken from the book: The Testament of Sidney Warburg.

To order it

Click here

The great political assassinations that have marked the century have all been ordered by these occult powers and their real motivations carefully camouflaged from the general public.

Even if their name was never involved, the men who decided them had, whatever their camp, all the occult instruments of power at their disposal for that.

Here are a few notable examples, out of hundreds:

  • Franz Ferdinand of Habsburg heir to the throne (assassinated by Princip, Serbian nationalist in 1914)
  • Jean Jaurès deputy of the socialist and pacifist Tarn (assassinated by Villain, French nationalist in 1914)
  • Louis Barthou French Minister of Foreign Affairs (assassinated in 1934 by a nationalist Ustashi)
    Engelbert Dollfuss Chancellor of Austria (murdered by the Nazis in 1934)
  • Russian intellectual and revolutionary Leon Trotsky (assassinated by the NKVD on Stalin’s orders in 1940)
  • Mahatma Gandhi Father of the Indian Nation (assassinated by Nathuram Godse, Indian nationalist in 1948)
  • J.F. Kennedy President of the United States and his brother Robert (murdered by the Mafia and the CIA, 1963 and 1968)
  • Martin Luther King Anti-segregationist pastor (assassinated in 1968 by James Earl, neo-fascist)
  • Salvador Allende President of the Republic of Chile (assassinated in 1973 by Augusto Pinochet and the CIA)
  • Aldo Moro President of the Italian Council (assassinated in 1978 by the Italian CIA-sponsored Red Brigades and SRs)
  • Anouar el-Sadat (assassinated in 1981 by Islamist nationalist Khalid Islambouli)
  • Yitzhak Rabin Israeli prime minister, Nobel Peace Prize winner (assassinated in 1995 by a Jewish extremist)
  • Boris Nemtsov, opponent of Vladimir Putin (murdered by two “unknowns” in Moscow in 2016)

And all the wars proceeded from the same logic. The study by Mr. Milton Leitenberg, working under the aegis of the Netherlands Institute of International Relations, offers us the figure, both staggering and elusive for the human mind, of 231 million victims of conflicts, during of the 20th century alone.

Starting from these universally accepted and recognized figures, I propose, in order to escape their abstraction, to establish a short nomenclature of the most significant:

  • Between 1900 and 1908: 4 million deaths in the Belgian Congo. That is the price of successful colonization and access to the fabulous diamond deposits and other raw materials of this country.
    From 1909 to 1916: The Mexican revolution will make 1 million victims, one of its stakes, in addition to a better distribution of the lands, was the concession of the oil fields, finally obtained by the Standard Oil of Mr. Rockefeller.
  • Between 1914 and 1918: The First World War was provoked mainly by England and France, in order to prevent Germany, an emerging power, from appropriating certain other colonies to the detriment of the great existing Empires, and from opening up a route to the east and China. Official balance sheet: Between 13 and 15 million dead. The conflict colossally enriched the same Standard Oil as well as, on the British side, Mr Henri Deterding’s Shell, and in general the arms trusts that we find at the heart of all the conflicts of the century.
  • From 1915 to 1916: The Armenian Genocide will claim the lives of 1.2 million people.
  • From 1918 to 1922: The civil war in Russia will make more than 12.5 million victims. One of the major stakes of this “forgotten” conflict was for the Western countries which took part in it (the USA, Great Britain and France) the free access to the immense wealth, in particular oil of this country. Here again, Shell and Standard Oil, but also the other trusts they controlled, were at the forefront of those concerned.
  • In the 1930s: The USSR Gulagen, the famine in Ukraine (6 million dead), and the Japanese invasion of China claimed other millions of victims. For the Japanese, it was a question of opening up access to raw materials, which the richest region of China concealed.
  • From 1936 to 1939: The Spanish Civil War claimed 600,000 souls. As a price for his participation in the conflict, Hitler obtained almost unlimited access to the country’s precious metal mines, an essential factor in the Nazi Reich’s rearmament effort.
  • Between 1939 and 1945, the Second World War alone caused between 65 and 75 million deaths. Here again, the war goal was the end of the communist regime in the USSR, and therefore the reopening of the Russian market to “free enterprise”, that is to say the unlimited exploitation of the country’s wealth by large companies. multinationals.
  • In the early 1950s, the Korean War cost 2 to 5 million human beings. It was the first conflict of a Cold War that would continue until 1989, adding millions of casualties on dozens of “minor” fronts.
  • From 1962 to 1975, the only American war brought to Vietnam and neighboring countries, will cost the lives of a million communist fighters and 4 million civilians, in Vietnam alone.
    At the same time the wars of liberation: Indochina, Algeria will bring their contingent.
  • Between 1949 and 1976: 46.5 million Chinese will be killed in the various campaigns under the Chinese communist dictatorship of Mao Zedong. Figure resulting, as in the USSR, both from the fighting between the communist and “anti-communist” armies, and from the various famines caused by the disastrous management of these countries and the blockade of the capitalist powers. Again, the only real motive was the reopening of a closed market to the exploitation of international trusts and cartels.
  • Then, between 1969 and 1970, there were the 2 million deaths of the Nigeria-Biafra civil war. The challenge for the great powers arming the belligerents is once again free access to the mineral wealth of these countries. This logic provoked underhand:
  • In 1971, the million and a half victims for the independence of Bangladesh.
  • Between 1975 and 1979 the extermination of 1.5 to 2.5 million Cambodians by Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge. This time communist ideological “blunder”…
  • From 1980 to 1988: There are between 500,000 and 1.2 million victims during the Iran-Iraq war. The challenge: Access to oil. Main stakeholders: Shell, Standard-Oil, its many shell companies, and still the largest arms trading trusts.
  • Between 1983 and 2000: 2 million deaths in Sudan. 800,000 in Rwanda and 350,000 in Somalia. Once again, the conflicts were desired, organized and financed by the same interests.

To finish this short presentation in beauty, Mr. Milton Leitenberg reminds us that the period 1914-1947 alone was “the most deadly period in the whole history of humanity with 100 to 200 million violent deaths on a planet then populated by about 2 billion living beings.”

So much for the 20th century alone.

In reality, these wars, like all those that have existed since the beginning of humanity, have never had any other causes than the lure of profit. Whether an attempt was made to seize the original lentil dish, or the lands, women, slaves, wealth of its neighbors, no one, ever, has waged war for any other reason. The only engine powerful enough to drive such risk-taking, and such massacres, is, and always will be, the greed of some, and the total lack of scruples of dictators, politicians, and all those who are subservient to them.

Thus, the lie presides in politics. None, or almost none, of its actors hesitates for a moment to lie to the voters as soon as they deem it necessary, legitimizing this lie by the adage “Who wants the end wants the means” and, as in the end he is the candidate who carries the solution and will “save the country”, or “redress the situation”, after all, whatever the most elementary morality matters.

Besides, the People are today so accustomed to lies that the newspaper Le Point, at the time of the French presidential elections of 2012, was reduced to headline: “Who lies the least?”…

In the same vein, it is common knowledge that concealment does not only serve their personal interests, or even those of powerful pressure groups, but that it is an essential component of the functioning of States, and this regardless of either the party, or the man, in power, whatever form of government the country even adopts. From the most unbridled totalitarianism to the most open democracy, passing through the banana republics, or the “revolutionary” governments, all, without the smallest exception, have adopted the principle of “state secrecy” as the necessary basis for smooth running of the world. In reality, all the men who have reached the head of these states lie for the sole purpose that nothing change the logic that led them to power.

Here again, the Truth is not a given. The Peoples are, abused, betrayed.

And to take up our refrain: No one ignores it.

End of quote (The Testament of Sidney Warburg)


Click here