NOTE: The texts below are taken from the book: The Testament of Sidney Warburg.

To order it

The great political assassinations that have marked the century have all been ordered by these occult powers and their real motivations carefully camouflaged from the general public.

Even if their name was never involved, the men who decided them had, whatever their camp, all the occult instruments of power at their disposal for that.

---

Here are a few notable examples, out of hundreds:

• Franz Ferdinand of Habsburg heir to the throne (assassinated by Princip, Serbian nationalist in 1914)
• Jean Jaurès deputy of the socialist and pacifist Tarn (assassinated by Villain, French nationalist in 1914)
• Louis Barthou French Minister of Foreign Affairs (assassinated in 1934 by a nationalist Ustashi)
  Engelbert Dollfuss Chancellor of Austria (murdered by the Nazis in 1934)
• Russian intellectual and revolutionary Leon Trotsky (assassinated by the NKVD on Stalin’s orders in 1940)
• Mahatma Gandhi Father of the Indian Nation (assassinated by Nathuram Godse, Indian nationalist in 1948)
• J.F. Kennedy President of the United States and his brother Robert (murdered by the Mafia and the CIA, 1963 and 1968)
• Martin Luther King Anti-segregationist pastor (assassinated in 1968 by James Earl, neo-fascist)
• Salvador Allende President of the Republic of Chile (assassinated in 1973 by Augusto Pinochet and the CIA)
• Aldo Moro President of the Italian Council (assassinated in 1978 by the Italian CIA-sponsored Red Brigades and SRs)
• Anouar el-Sadat (assassinated in 1981 by Islamist nationalist Khalid Islambouli)
• Yitzhak Rabin Israeli prime minister, Nobel Peace Prize winner (assassinated in 1995 by a Jewish extremist)
• Boris Nemtsov, opponent of Vladimir Putin (murdered by two “unknowns” in Moscow in 2016)

---

And all the wars proceeded from the same logic. The study by Mr. Milton Leitenberg, working under the aegis of the Netherlands Institute of International Relations, offers us the figure, both staggering and elusive for the human mind, of 231 million victims of conflicts, during of the 20th century alone.

Starting from these universally accepted and recognized figures, I propose, in order to escape their abstraction, to establish a short nomenclature of the most significant:

• Between 1900 and 1908: 4 million deaths in the Belgian Congo. That is the price of successful colonization and access to the fabulous diamond deposits and other raw materials of this country.
  From 1909 to 1916: The Mexican revolution will make 1 million victims, one of its stakes, in addition to a better distribution of the lands, was the concession of the oil fields, finally obtained by the Standard Oil of Mr. Rockefeller.
• Between 1914 and 1918: The First World War was provoked mainly by England and France, in order to prevent Germany, an emerging power, from appropriating certain other colonies to the detriment of the great existing Empires, and from opening up a route to the east and China. Official balance sheet: Between 13 and 15 million dead. The conflict colossally enriched the same Standard Oil as well as, on the British side, Mr Henri Deterding’s Shell, and in general the arms trusts that we find at the heart of all the conflicts of the century.
• From 1915 to 1916: The Armenian Genocide will claim the lives of 1.2 million people.
• From 1918 to 1922: The civil war in Russia will make more than 12.5 million victims. One of the major stakes of this “forgotten” conflict was for the Western countries which took part in it (the USA, Great Britain and France) the free access to the immense wealth, in particular oil of this country. Here again, Shell and Standard Oil, but also the other trusts they controlled, were at the forefront of those concerned.
• In the 1930s: The USSR Gulagen, the famine in Ukraine (6 million dead), and the Japanese invasion of China claimed other millions of victims. For the Japanese, it was a question of opening up access to raw materials, which the richest region of China concealed.
• From 1936 to 1939: The Spanish Civil War claimed 600,000 souls. As a price for his participation in the conflict, Hitler obtained almost unlimited access to the country’s precious metal mines, an essential factor in the Nazi Reich’s rearmament effort.
• Between 1939 and 1945, the Second World War alone caused between 65 and 75 million deaths. Here again, the war goal was the end of the communist regime in the USSR, and therefore the reopening of the Russian market to “free enterprise”, that is to say the unlimited exploitation of the country’s wealth by large companies. multinationals.
• In the early 1950s, the Korean War cost 2 to 5 million human beings. It was the first conflict of a Cold War that would continue until 1989, adding millions of casualties on dozens of “minor” fronts.
• From 1962 to 1975, the only American war brought to Vietnam and neighboring countries, will cost the lives of a million communist fighters and 4 million civilians, in Vietnam alone.
  At the same time the wars of liberation: Indochina, Algeria will bring their contingent.
• Between 1949 and 1976: 46.5 million Chinese will be killed in the various campaigns under the Chinese communist dictatorship of Mao Zedong. Figure resulting, as in the USSR, both from the fighting between the communist and “anti-communist” armies, and from the various famines caused by the disastrous management of these countries and the blockade of the capitalist powers. Again, the only real motive was the reopening of a closed market to the exploitation of international trusts and cartels.
• Then, between 1969 and 1970, there were the 2 million deaths of the Nigeria-Biafra civil war. The challenge for the great powers arming the belligerents is once again free access to the mineral wealth of these countries. This logic provoked underhand:
• In 1971, the million and a half victims for the independence of Bangladesh.
• Between 1975 and 1979 the extermination of 1.5 to 2.5 million Cambodians by Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge. This time communist ideological “blunder”…
• From 1980 to 1988: There are between 500,000 and 1.2 million victims during the Iran-Iraq war. The challenge: Access to oil. Main stakeholders: Shell, Standard-Oil, its many shell companies, and still the largest arms trading trusts.
• Between 1983 and 2000: 2 million deaths in Sudan. 800,000 in Rwanda and 350,000 in Somalia. Once again, the conflicts were desired, organized and financed by the same interests.

---

To finish this short presentation in beauty, Mr. Milton Leitenberg reminds us that the period 1914-1947 alone was “the most deadly period in the whole history of humanity with 100 to 200 million violent deaths on a planet then populated by about 2 billion living beings.”

So much for the 20th century alone.

In reality, these wars, like all those that have existed since the beginning of humanity, have never had any other causes than the lure of profit. Whether an attempt was made to seize the original lentil dish, or the lands, women, slaves, wealth of its neighbors, no one, ever, has waged war for any other reason. The only engine powerful enough to drive such risk-taking, and such massacres, is, and always will be, the greed of some, and the total lack of scruples of dictators, politicians, and all those who are subservient to them.

Thus, the lie presides in politics. None, or almost none, of its actors hesitates for a moment to lie to the voters as soon as they deem it necessary, legitimizing this lie by the adage “Who wants the end wants the means” and, as in the end he is the candidate who carries the solution and will “save the country”, or “redress the situation”, after all, whatever the most elementary morality matters.

Besides, the People are today so accustomed to lies that the newspaper Le Point, at the time of the French presidential elections of 2012, was reduced to headline: “Who lies the least?”…

In the same vein, it is common knowledge that concealment does not only serve their personal interests, or even those of powerful pressure groups, but that it is an essential component of the functioning of States, and this regardless of either the party, or the man, in power, whatever form of government the country even adopts. From the most unbridled totalitarianism to the most open democracy, passing through the banana republics, or the “revolutionary” governments, all, without the smallest exception, have adopted the principle of “state secrecy” as the necessary basis for smooth running of the world. In reality, all the men who have reached the head of these states lie for the sole purpose that nothing change the logic that led them to power.

Here again, the Truth is not a given. The Peoples are, abused, betrayed.

And to take up our refrain: No one ignores it.

End of quote (The Testament of Sidney Warburg)

TO ORDER IT

One of the main pillars of the “incomprehensible” Blitzkrieg theory maintains that the general staffs, like the Allied politicians, had no knowledge of the German plan, says Manstein, which envisaged encircling the Allied armies in Belgium , and that they were not more aware of the date of the attack.

But nothing could be more deceitful.

In reality, the allies were perfectly aware of all the details of this plan from February 1940.

As for the date and time of the attack, they were communicated to them on April 31, so ten days before May 10.

Non-exhaustive list of information obtained by the highest Allied authorities, before the battle: (excerpt from Volume N°1 of the series The Great Lie of the 20th Century)

Between the end of November 1939 and the end of January 1940, the Allied Intelligence Services noted that the number of enemy divisions on the Belgian and Luxembourg borders increased from 25 to 57.

In addition to this information, they have, as of this date, many other first-hand information:

As early as January 1940, the date of Hitler’s first changes in this direction, General Gamelin was warned by his Belgian military contacts that the forces of the Reich could also attack in the Ardennes.
On January 11, a note from the 2nd Bureau mentions the possibility of German action against the Scandinavian countries.

On January 12 at 9 a.m., General Gamelin urgently summoned his direct subordinate, General Georges commanding the armies of the North, to Vincennes to inform him of the information obtained from Leopold III of Belgium, Pope Pius XII and Count Ciano Italian Minister of Foreign Affairs, indicating the imminence of an attack – January 14 at dawn – against Belgium.
The information was correct, the attack was postponed.

On February 1, the Bern post, which maintained discreet contact with the Swiss SRs exploiting the Roessler network, reported that “the Swiss General Staff is convinced that Germany will, within a few weeks, attack Belgium and the Holland”.

On February 2, source “A”, a young communist whose father was a general and served in the Ministry of War, dealt with by the chief captain of the SR in The Hague, placed this offensive in the spring.

The same day, the post in The Hague collected similar information, however restricting the German attack to Dutch territory but combining it with massive air raids on England.
Correct information, we are a few days BEFORE the final adoption of the German plan, known as “Manstein”, which will bring the main effort to the Ardennes.

On February 17, General von Manstein officially informed Hitler of his plan, and the latter definitively adopted it on the 20th.
A few days later, Lieutenant René Hauth, an officer of the French 5th Bureau stationed in Longwy, in contact with the Luxembourg SRs, was informed of the main lines of this plan, in particular the fact that Army Group A would pass through the Grand Duchy to join the French border. He immediately transmits the information to the highest officials of GHQ in Paris.

On February 26, the corresponding “Ha office” of the Roessler network confirmed the outline of this plan and transmitted it to the Swiss SRs, which would immediately pass on to all the Allies.

On February 27, the source “T”, a young Austrian patriot, treated by the French military attaché in Vienna, Colonel Saland, informed his correspondent verbally: “The successive delays since last November have been the consequence of an opposition hidden from the German generals at Hitler’s will, repeatedly reiterated, to put an end to the West. This one is always firmly decided to attack simultaneously Belgium, Holland and France. At the same time, the Luftwaffe will crush England with massive bombardments.

In the meantime, his immediate objective lies in the seizure of Denmark and Sweden, in order to deny the allies access to the Baltic, to isolate Sweden and to ensure the delivery by this country of the ore essential to the industry. German war. »

This is exactly the general plan of attack in the west.

During the month of March, seven armored divisions will be spotted facing the border and the deployment of the troops will clearly indicate that the main enemy thrust will be exerted in the center of the front, approximately between Sedan and Namur at the hinge of the 2nd and 9th armies. This deployment will be accompanied by all the necessary information:

On March 1, Hitler sends a directive to his generals concerning the future operation in Denmark, an operation combined with that which will be carried out by Falkenhorst against Norway.

In the days that followed, Scandinavia, Denmark and Norway were notified by the Roessler network. Information confirmed by the other agents.

On March 2, according to the French SRs: “an informant in a position to be very well informed about the opinions expressed in the circles of the German High Command, let it be known that a German offensive would be imminent on the Western front; it would include the invasion of Belgium and Holland. »
The same day, the information concerning the invasion of Denmark is retained as accurate by the high command.

On March 8, the Swiss received the first details of France’s plan of attack through the Roessler network.

Following the previous information concerning Poland or Norway, the reliability of the information communicated to ALL the allies (France England, Belgium, Holland etc…) by Colonel Masson, head of the Swiss intelligence service, is not questionable.

On the same day, King Leopold III of Belgium informed his government that all the indications received pointed to a concentrated German thrust: “through the Ardennes in the direction of Dinant – Saint-Quentin, with the intention of cutting off Paris from the allied armies in Belgium and to encircle them in Pas de Calais”.
He instructed his military attaché in Paris to inform General Gamelin and to insist on the “certainty based on convincing documents, that the main axis of the enemy maneuver would be oriented perpendicular to the Longwy – Givet front. »

On March 10, Colonel Delvoie Belgian military attaché received, still from Roessler, therefore from the Swiss SRs, the new measures of the Manstein plan (Fall Gelb N°4) definitively adopted three days earlier by Hitler.
It is specified there that: “the German offensive will be directed on the Meuse, between Charleville and Sedan. The breakthrough will be made through the Ardennes, while the bulk of the German army will fix the bulk of the French, Belgian and British forces on the Belgian border. The tanks of General Heinz Guderian will execute the breakthrough at Sedan, then will pivot in a gigantic sickle blow, in the direction of the lower Somme. They will strive to reach the sea, hoping to trap the bulk of the Allied armies. »
On the orders of his government, Delvoie officially transmitted this information to General Georges’ staff.
All the details of this new plan (number of divisions, distribution plan, material potential, etc.) will be sent to the various Allied HQs between this date and the end of April.

The same day, Colonel Navarre, met in Lugano one of his great agents, Hans-Thilo Schmidt, (alias Ashe) brother of General of Armor Schmidt, commanding the 39th Army Corps integrated into Army Group A. ci confirms that “instead of carrying as planned the main effort of the Wehrmacht on Belgium and Holland” the strongest of the attack would be carried out in the Belgian and French Ardennes and that “the offensive would continue in the direction of the west towards the lower Somme. Thus would be locked up in a veritable trap the Allied forces of the North and of course the Belgian and Dutch armies. »
End of quote (Paillole Our spy at Hitler page 198)

On March 13, Colonel Delvoie received from General van Overstraeten, the King’s military adviser, the order to officially transmit this information to the HQ of General Gamelin, Generalissimo of the Allied Armies and to the staff of General Georges Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. North. He specifies that “according to all the data collected, the main axis of the enemy maneuver was oriented perpendicular to the Longwy-Givet front” but ignores at this time that the French high command already had all this information, transmitted by its military attachés. in Bern.

In the same month of March 1940, seven armored divisions were spotted in positions which allowed them to move westwards south of Liège: “Thus, on that date, the deployment of troops and Panzers clearly indicated that the main enemy thrust would be exerted in the center of the front, approximately between Sedan and Namur, a sector held by the fragile 9th Army. »

On the other hand, the German genius begins to throw on the Rhine, between Bonn and Bingen, eight bridges of boats. These bridges are photographed by Captain Antoine de Saint-Exupéry on an observation mission over Germany aboard his Bloch 141.
As Shirer, who noted these facts, put it: “So many pontoons in the area made it clear where the enemy intended to strike hardest with their armored and motorized troops. The indication became clearer still a few days later, when several other similar bridges were thrown over the Moselle and the Ohr, on the border of undefended Luxembourg, where real panic ensued. »

At the same time, a report by René Marty, staff officer at Gamelin HQ, responsible since January for studying the conditions of arrival of German forces on the Meuse, concluded that the breakthrough would be effective in 48 hours. According to the official version, the report is not taken into consideration: “So as not to demoralize the troops”.

On March 14, Roland de Margerie, chief of staff of Paul Reynaud, president of the Council, receives written confirmation of the plan of attack from Elisabeth Wiskemann, an English journalist with extensive connections in German anti-Nazi circles, in Switzerland and in Italy. . She ends her letter with these words: “Excuse me if you already know all this, but my informant thinks that “es kann sehr bald losgehen” (this may start very soon)

On March 16, agent A 54 of the Czechoslovak SRs, whose real name was Paul Thümmel, a senior German official qualified by the Allies as a perfectly reliable source, having already warned of attacks against Prague, Poland, then Norway, confirmed that Hitler decided to violate the neutrality of Holland and Belgium, to attack France and England, and in turn gives further details of the “Manstein” plan.

On April 3, Colonel Goethals transmitted to the Belgian SRs new information from Colonel Oster, commander of the Abwehr in Berlin. He has been informing the allies for months, and affirms:

“It is wrong to believe that nothing will happen on the western front. I have a deep conviction that it will be unleashed soon. I cannot fix a date, but my personal impression is that 15 April could be the start of an offensive action, led first against Denmark in the direction of Norway and three or four days later against Belgium and Holland. I repeat that I am absolutely convinced of an offensive in the west. »
The next day, April 4, Colonel Oster confirms: “You may not believe me, but a large-scale expedition is being prepared with the aim of occupying Denmark and Norway. The troops destined for Norway are embarking at this very moment at Stettin. The occupation will take place next Tuesday (April 9). The offensive against the West will follow soon after. The operation is a personal initiative of the Führer. The secret has been so well kept that no one except at the highest level knows about it. No more than five other people in Germany at this time. I am the sixth. It is of the utmost importance that Denmark, Norway and England are warned. Do everything you can! »
We will note here that one, at least, of the informants of the Roessler network, who will always be better and more quickly informed than Colonel Oster, must have been part of these “five people”.

We will come back…

General Navarre testifies: “The uncertainty was removed at the very beginning of April by information coming from a very good agent, reporting concentrations of troops and ships in the ports of the Baltic and announcing the imminent invasion of Denmark. and Norway. On April 5 and 6, preparations for boarding in Stettin were detected.
On April 7, the action was deemed certain by the SR”

Concerning the attack in the West he specifies: “From the beginning of April, the rhythm of information of all kinds announcing the offensive went on accelerating. In particular, the following were reported: The construction of bridges and piers on the Moselle and on the Rhine, movements of armored forces, the distribution of maps of Luxembourg and Belgium, the increase in certain depots west of the Rhine, the reduction of civil traffic on the railways leading west, the withdrawal of German planes from Holland, the preparation of crossing points on the Oure and the Sure, the withdrawal of the antennas of the German SR operating in Belgium and Holland.

News situating the German attack across Belgium, Holland and Luxembourg was often mixed with others drawing our attention to the Maginot Line, Alsace or the Swiss border. At no time did the second office and the SR allow themselves to be shaken by these false indications, the character of which was detected as intoxication. »

End of quote (Navarre The intelligence service page 108)

April 11: “Imminent operations in the west, watch out for military movements in the next few days. »

April 12: Captain Paul Paillole of the 2nd Bureau is warned by one of his double agents Schlochoff, who also works for the Abwehr, that the Abwehr 1 posts in Munster and Stuttgart are insistently interested in all topographical details and soldiers in this area and have just entrusted it with the task of surveying the Sedan, Charleville, Saint-Quentin, Amiens axis, the width of the waterways, the condition of the banks, the load-bearing capacity of the bridges and identifying the French troops on the spot, as well as the petrol depots. The agents in charge of this prospecting must provide the elements of response before April 15. »

This is exactly the axis of attack described by Roessler and the other informants.

Captain Paillole is sent to La Ferté sous Jouarre to draw the attention of the head of the 3rd Office (operations) of the North-East command to these disturbing facts. On the basis of the questionnaires, the 5th Bureau (German intelligence) confirms that it may be the main axis of the German offensive. Passing through the Ardennes, it would aim to reach the North Sea.
The date of April 15 also makes it possible to suppose that this offensive could take place at the end of April at the beginning of May, taking into account the time necessary for the exploitation of the information collected.

On April 13, King Leopold III of Belgium insists and asks his military adviser, General van Overstraeten, to confirm to the French military attaché, Colonel Hautcoeur, that according to the information provided by his SRs, Hitler’s tactics will be “to draw the Franco-British into Belgium with the intention of crushing them with an enveloping response, emerging from the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. He added that it “now seemed obvious to him that the Germans hoped to draw the Allied forces into Belgium and destroy them there from the south, by means of armies coming up from Luxembourg”. Information sent by Hautcoeur the next day.

On April 18, Colonel Gauché, boss of the 2nd French Bureau in charge of gathering and synthesizing intelligence, confirms:

“An excellent diplomatic source reports talks that an informant had with various German military leaders: Hitler ordered to attack Holland and the Maginot Line soon. This action would be combined with an action against Sweden. »

– On the same date, a high German political figure of the Weimar Republic declared that the German command would prepare to attack Holland. The same source reports that an informant, who had already announced the invasion of Denmark, let it be known that the attack against Belgium, Holland and the Western front was to be expected from May 8 in the morning in case of good weather and , otherwise, within a few days. »

End of quote (Colonel Gauché The 2nd Bureau at work)

April 20: “German SR personnel abandon their parking places in Belgium”.

On April 24, Colonel Oster gave the following information:

“The Führer has written to Mussolini that he has decided to start operations in the West soon. Based on the information received and my personal impressions, I believe that the offensive could start next week. »

On April 29, agent A 54 sends the 2nd Czechoslovak Bureau in London the following message, written in sympathetic ink:

“German units and equipment are transported to Italy. Perhaps Yugoslavia will be occupied. Italy sends many units to Albania to enter southern Yugoslavia.
The division into spheres of influence between Germany and Italy was negotiated by Hitler and Mussolini. Feverish preparations for the air attack on England… The USSR is present behind the Romanian border, hence the German pressure on Romania.

The planned military invasion of England is postponed because troops are needed in Norway… When Italy enters the war, Switzerland will probably be invaded… (-)”

All of this information was confirmed to the British SRs throughout this period by another of their direct sources: Agent Sator, stationed in Silesia.

There is therefore no doubt that the leaders of the two allied countries were perfectly informed, since they were cross-referencing their information.

Second essential information: D-Day

In addition to all the provisions of the Manstein Plan, which the Allied high commands now know perfectly well, we come to the second problem posed to their Intelligence Services: The date of the attack.
Remember that it will occur on May 10 at dawn.
Knowing that the official thesis asserts that the SRs will be unable to foresee it until the last minute, let’s see what really happened.

On April 30, the French military attaché in Switzerland, Commander Gaston Pourchot, who since March has been transmitting all the details of the Manstein plan, receives the following information from the Swiss SRs, therefore from Roessler, a source he describes as ” fully authorized and first-hand”: “Germany will attack between May 8th and 10th. Stop. Main axis effort, Sedan. Stop. Planned occupation of Holland and Belgium, northern France in 10 days. Stop. Total occupation of France in one month. Stop. End “
The same day, the information is confirmed:

1° By agent Paul Thümmel (agent A 54) from Prague.

2. By Commander Munier of the French intelligence services in Budapest.
So THREE leading sources, and recognized as perfectly safe.

Finally, “from The Hague, Captain Truttat, who also belongs to the SRs, transmitted the alarms from the Dutch general staff at the end of the evening, as did the naval attaché, Lieutenant Commander Guichard. »
(Berben and Iselin The Panzers pass the Meuse page 78)

Given the importance of the information, Pourchot went in person to Paris to communicate it in more detail to the general staff, to Generals Gamelin and Georges, to the Minister of War Édouard Daladier, and to the Minister of Foreign Affairs, therefore to Paul Reynaud, who combines this office with that of Chairman of the Board, since March 21, 1940.
On the same day, the periodic intelligence conference was held at GHQ in Montry, bringing together French and British specialists, chaired by Colonel Gauché, head of General Gamelin’s 2nd Bureau. Major Maisonneuve, assigned to the 2nd Bureau of HQ Northeast, takes stock of the situation: “Massive action by paratroopers, intense aerial bombardments paralyzing the Allied response, submersion of Holland and Belgium, battle in the open countryside between the German armored fist and the Allied divisions, a dazzling enemy breakthrough taking the Maginot Line from the rear and opening the way to the infantry rushing en masse into French territory. »
Either a perfect summary of the Manstein plan.

On May 1, agent A 54 transmits the same information to his contact in The Hague and specifies: Attack on Holland on May 10.

The information is brought to the attention of the authorities concerned. Thanks to this telegram, the royal family and the Dutch government will not be taken by surprise, and will be able to leave the country in time.
– The many observers on the ground confirm from all sides, and Colonel Gauché, testifies in his book: “During the second half of April and at the beginning of May, the information, by its alarming nature, will be made more and more pressing with the approach of the beautiful days of spring. »

Indeed, concentrations of troops north of the Moselle, facing Dutch Limburg, Belgium and Luxembourg are noted by French intelligence.

– Finally, still on May 1, at the Swedish legation in Belgrade, the German military attaché declared, during a well-watered reception, that the offensive was near, that it would be devastating and that Paris would fall on June 15. . He will only be wrong by twenty-four hours!

On May 2, Captain Paul Paillole of the Counterintelligence Services testified that the English had also been informed by the Swiss and Czech SRs: “The imminence of a German offensive appeared to the English. A meeting of the heads of departments of the second and fifth French and British offices takes place at the British Embassy. Our information is compared with that of our allies. The connections are further strengthened. (-) Bertrand’s services (thanks to the Enigma machine) reveal the preparation of air attacks on our airfields every day. On May 6, the antenna of the German S. R. of Stuttgart installed in Luxembourg folds. On the 7th and 8th, everything confirms the offensive dispositions of the Wehrmacht. »

Knowing that the information transmitted by the agents Roessler and A 54, were communicated to the English, the doubt is not allowed any more: their importance could not in any case have escaped any of the Allies.

This is why, on the same May 2, General Gamelin ordered General Condé: “Enter Luxembourg. Urgent departure! »

On May 3, Colonel Oster of the Abwehr told his friend, Colonel Sas Dutch military attache in Berlin, that General Keitel himself had told him that the attack on the Netherlands and Belgium were planned for the next few days, probably from the 8th if the weather allowed.

Also on May 3, Pope Pius XII, warned by Dr. Joseph Muller, secret representative in the Vatican of Admiral Canaris’ resistance group, asked the Apostolic Nuncio in Brussels and the inter-Nuncio in The Hague to warn the most senior Belgian and Dutch officials: “the German offensive is imminent”.
Expected date: Between May 8 and May 10

On May 4, the Apostolic Nuncio informed the King of the Belgians, and two days later the sovereign pontiff confirmed this in person to Princess Marie-Josée who informed her brother, King Leopold.

On May 5, Mgr Maglione, the Pope’s secretary of state, sent a encrypted telegram to the nuncios of Brussels and The Hague, announcing an upcoming offensive on Holland and Belgium, of which the sovereigns were warned.

The same information is confirmed by the Belgian ambassador to the Vatican who informs Brussels by telephone.

All this information comes from the German Democratic generals.

– The same day, Vice-Admiral Abrial, commanding the Northern Fleet, was warned by the naval attache in Holland. He transmits the information to GHQ. General Giraud, who commands the 7th Army, and the first concerned by the Breda plan, is also informed by Abrial,

Preventively and, according to the State version “on their own initiative”, the two men then ordered the embarkation of troops within the framework of the Breda variant, planning to bring a first contingent of the VIIth Army, to occupy the islands of Zeeland, therefore the mouth of the Scheldt, on the border between Belgium and Holland.

No doubt they intended to start the war on their own, by attacking two neutral countries…

On May 4, 5 and 8, General Headquarters at Vincennes, as well as the heads of the 2nd and 5th Bureaus of General Georges’ staff, received new information from Roessler confirming the imminence of the breakthrough at Sedan and of the sickle blow in the direction of the North Sea, as well as the final details of the operation.
– At the same time, “a reliable source” reports that the Dutch government was advised on May 5, by a very high neutral personality, that a German attack was to be feared at short notice.

– The same source reports that an informant, who had already announced the invasion of Denmark, let it be known that the attack against Belgium, Holland and the Western front was to be expected as early as May 8 in the morning in case of good weather and, if not, within a few days. (I specify that it is about Roessler)

End of quote (Colonel Gauché the 2nd Bureau at work)

Night of May 5-6: The French SRs record: “Next general offensive, which will encompass the Netherlands. »

That same evening, Major Sas Dutch military attaché in Berlin, informed by his friend Colonel Oster of the Abwehr, alerted The Hague that “the invasion is for tomorrow”.

Holland takes immediate action (bridges mined, permissions removed)

On May 6, Colonel Gauché specified that his services had been informed that: “The antenna of the German SR in Stuttgart stationed in Luxembourg is withdrawing. Attack ready. The French army, it is said in the circles of the German command, will be unable to stop the armored formations in open country”.
– The same day, Commander Gustave Bertrand, cipher agent in charge of deciphering the most secret Luftwaffe messages coded by the Enigma machine, warns of preparations for an attack on French airfields.

– Information qualified as “good source” by the SRs, announces in turn: “Next general offensive which will include the Netherlands. »

The same day, the Pope in person receives in private audience Prince Humbert of Piedmont and his wife Princess Marie-Josée of Belgium, to confirm this information to them. She notifies her brother King Leopold of Belgium, who transmits the same information to the French and British governments.

– In the evening, the English ambassador to the Vatican reports to his government: “The Vatican is expecting a German offensive in the west at the beginning of the week. (-) It is also said to the Curia that the operations can extend not only to the Maginot line, Holland and Belgium, but also to Switzerland. »
– Finally, the movements of German troops towards the borders of Luxembourg, Belgium and Holland are confirmed to all governments. That is a total of 73 divisions concentrated on the part of the front going from Kleef to the Moselle.

On the evening of May 6, Colonel Oster contacted his friend Sas, a Dutch military attaché in Berlin, and told him that the planned date for the attack was May 8. “The German forces are in an attack position and could launch the offensive within 12 hours of the final order. The offensive will probably be preceded by an ultimatum to the capitals concerned, in the very short term. »

As usual, he informed the Dutch general staff and General Goethals, Belgian military attaché in Berlin.
On May 7, the antennas of the French SR in Luxembourg communicate the exact objectives of the German paratroopers.

Around 10 a.m., the Auswaertige Amt (German Foreign Office) telephones the Dutch ambassador in Berlin to urgently request diplomatic visas for four important officials who must leave for Holland immediately. Among them are Fritz Todt, the great builder of the Reich, creator of many highways, Richard von Kuehlmann known for having been one of the protagonists of the severe Treaty of Brest Litovsk dictated to Soviet Russia in 1918, and finally a certain Kiewitz “sent Führer staff in the Reich Chancellery”.

This is the delegation that will have to deliver an ultimatum to Belgium.

– Shortly afterwards, still in Berlin, Leonardo Simoni, Ambassador of Italy, receives from the Ambassador of Belgium a note written in pencil advising him that serious reasons oblige him to believe an attack against his country is inevitable and imminent. During the afternoon, notes Simoni, “the concern still grows. A reception takes place at the Swiss Embassy. It’s just dire news flowing from one to the other, faces defeated and upset. In the office of the Italian Embassy there is a veritable procession of officers and agitated civil servants who all bring the same news: Total war is coming! »

Also on May 7, the British agent “Sator” confirms to the London SRs the date of May 10 as the date of the attack.

– In Paris, in the Luxembourg conference room, the former President of the Council Pierre Laval, very surrounded, speaks of the imminence of the German attack.

Note here that Mr. Laval, whom we will find many times during this investigation, seems perfectly informed of the situation, even if according to the official version all his good people will be very “surprised” on the morning of May 10…

– At 3:15 p.m., leave in the Dutch army is abolished.

– In the evening, Oster informs his friend that “the case is postponed for several days”. Major Sas immediately transmits to Dutch and Belgian GHQ.

– At the same time, the French agents in Luxembourg communicate the exact objectives of the German paratroopers.
– Belgian reconnaissance officers are put on pre-alert. Each evening, the blocking devices are closed, and a number of destruction devices are initiated.

– Finally, concerning this day of commotion, General Ruby testifies that, contrary to what the fanatics of “incomprehensible” theses claim: “The aviation was alerted on May 7, by General Vuillemin. !
Which, we will see, will allow the French fighters to lay a trap for the German bombers on the morning of May 10. [1]

On the night of May 7 to 8, a French pilot, Colonel François, returning with his squadron after dropping leaflets on Düsseldorf, reported an enemy armored column more than 120 km long heading with all lights on towards the Belgian border. “The officer promptly made his observation known to his superiors, deeming it of capital importance. They refused to believe it. (Deposition of Daladier at the Riom trial)

On May 8, 1940, two days before the attack, two encrypted dispatches sent to Brussels by the Viscount of Avignon, Belgian ambassador in Berlin, provided further confirmation: the Wilhelmstrasse (Reich Ministry of Foreign Affairs) had finished drafting the ultimatum in the form of an indictment which they have decided to address to the King in order to establish a semblance of legitimacy for their action, and the military attaché affirms that the order to attack in the west just donated by the OKW.

Information that Colonel Gauché testifies to having received:

“the forthcoming arrival in The Hague of three officials from the Wilhelmstrasse who are supposed to be carrying a note or an ultimatum. This information, chosen from among the most important, all indicates the same intention known for many months (emphasis mine) and situates the event around May 10. »

At the same time, the Belgian military attache in Berlin wired that the German Supreme Command had issued the attack order.
At noon, General Delvoie telephoned from Paris to the 2nd Belgian section to announce: “We believe in a possible attack at short notice on the front: Grand Duchy, Belgium, Holland. Reconciliation by embassy. »

Rather surprising this sibylline message in view of the mass of information available to French SRs since April, and apparently the only officially recorded alert communication from French GHQ to its Belgian allies.

– The same day, Colonel Oster, announces to Major Sas the departure of the Führer for the West, in these terms: “The pig has left for the front”.
– The French ambassador to the Vatican, Charles Roux, collects the following information: “Before the end of the week, the forces of the Reich will invade Belgium, Holland and perhaps Switzerland. The invasion of Switzerland is only hypothetical, but the others are announced from reliable sources. »

In his memories, he testifies to having telegraphed to Paris:
“My telegram must have been in Paris on the 8th. I have no doubt that it was communicated to G.Q.G. de Vincennes, who must, moreover, be in possession of corroborating evidence. »

Still, on May 8, the aerial observations of the Allies indicate that many armored vehicles and German troops are moving towards the Ardennes massif.

The general alert is triggered at 11:15 p.m. in Belgium. France and Great Britain are informed.

The aerial observations of the Allies indicate that numerous armored vehicles and German troops are moving towards the Ardennes massif. This is half of the German army, or hundreds of thousands of men, horses and vehicles.
In the aftermath, the bulletin of the 2nd Bureau informs General Gamelin: Alert in Holland, abolition of leaves, recall of leave, accentuation of mobilization measures.
The radio commented widely on the news and a dispatch from the Havas agency reported that President Roosevelt had returned from Hyde Park earlier than expected, “because the situation in Europe caused him concern. »
On May 9, 75 German divisions reached their starting locations. They extend over a width of 400 kilometers and in depth to the banks of the Weser and the Thuringian mountains.

There are 6 armies, 25 army corps, 10 armored divisions, 3 air fleets, an airborne division and commando units; or about two million men, anxiously awaiting the code word “Dantzig”, which will allow them to set off.

That day, in Brussels, after information provided by a German journalist, the director of the press service of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had the police verify that the German embassy was in the process of destroying by fire all the folders.
The informant clarified that “It starts tomorrow at 5 a.m. (-) I don’t want to be in the bath. He will take the train to Aix la Chapelle in the afternoon.

From the Vatican, the Belgian ambassador reports by telephone to his Minister of Foreign Affairs of the imminence of the attack.

In the afternoon, a clandestine observer informed the headquarters of the SRs at Longwy of the setting up of crossing equipment on the Rhine, and the last message from Roessler and his officer friends was transmitted to GHQ at Vincennes: “Attack the May 10, in the Sedan Gap. Yellow plan maintained. Fifty divisions massed along the Belgian and Dutch borders. Guderian and Hoth ready to rush to Sedan. The dispatch ends with these words: “Hold on! »

In the morning, Colonel Oster informed Sas: “This afternoon, Hitler has set the start of the offensive on the entire Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg front for May 10 at dawn. The order can still be canceled, but not later than 9 p.m. tonight. »

In the evening the two men dine together for the last time and Oster confirms the attack for the next day at dawn.
That same evening, General Ironside, Chief of the Imperial General Staff of the British Army, noted in his personal diary that he had received the information that: “The Netherlands will be attacked in a few hours by the Wehrmacht. »

Around 8:30 p.m., the second section of the general staff of the French army received an encrypted telephone communication from the Belgian military attaché in Berlin, announcing that the invasion was planned for the next day at dawn. However, a counter-order remains possible until 9 p.m. But Colonel Georges calls back around 10:30 p.m. to warn that no cancellation has taken place.
Around 9 p.m., the 2nd section of the Belgian SRs received a cryptogram from Berlin from Colonel Goethals: “Usual informant (i.e. Oster): The Führer decided today afternoon, to launch a general offensive on the front Holland-Belgium-Luxembourg on May 10 at dawn. However, a counter-order, which is still possible, cannot be given after 9 p.m. for technical reasons. Reserve of use. Activity around OKW normal. »
At 10 p.m., Oster comes out of the Wehrmacht High Command, he finds Sas, who is waiting for him outside: “My dear friend, this time, it’s really over, there was no counterorder. »
Information confirmed by Major Sas, at 10:35 p.m.

Immediately the Dutch and the Belgians recalled all the personnel from their headquarters, and launched the general alert.
The last licensees are recalled, the bridges are mined.
In Belgium around 10 p.m., border observers report troop movements, revealing the imminence of the aggression.

The same evening, the representative of the French Intelligence Service in The Hague received the same information: “The attack would take place during the night. Objective, Holland and Sedan”.

He informs his government that “the invasion is for tomorrow”.
At the same time, the Belgian ministers of the Pierlot cabinet meet urgently at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and wonder: Should we immediately call for help from France and Great Britain? Finally, they decide to wait.

Which is understandable, they gave the alert to their allies, they will be able to prepare, the essential is done. You might as well let Hitler make the mistake of attacking two neutral countries.
That evening in The Hague, Defense Minister Dijxhoorn and members of Geer’s cabinet separated around 2 a.m.
The Minister will spend the night in his office. As a security measure, his two main collaborators have already been living at the ministry for a few days: “It is better to remain dressed, advised the minister. The message received from Berlin is so positive that we must be ready for any eventuality. »
10:20 p.m., the French ambassador to Luxembourg is warned of the imminence of the attack “at four in the morning” the next day, May 10. The Grand Duchess and her court are packing to take refuge in France.
10:30 p.m., the 3rd Ardennes Chasseurs Regiment goes on alert.

10:35 p.m., Colonel Sas calls Lieutenant-Colonel Post Uyterweer Naval Attaché of the Dutch Defense Minister, and without preamble shouts to him: “Post, you recognize my voice, I am Sas, in Berlin. I have only one thing to tell you: Tomorrow at dawn! Hold on tight ! Do you want to repeat? You know what I mean, don’t you? »
11:45 p.m., “POLUX”, a branch of the French SRs reports to the Central Traffic Office, from Captain Kleinman in Longwy:

“Important movements of German troops on the German-Luxembourg border at Palzem”.

General Navarre testified that “During the night of May 9 to 10, the alert networks (radio stations entrusted to sympathizers and Luxembourg gendarmes) set up by the French SR on the German-Luxembourg border, appeared from 11:45 p.m. The alert was also given by the antennas of Lorraine in Belgium and Holland. »
At 11.30 p.m. in the Netherlands, Queen Wilhelmina and all her family descended into the underground shelter of the royal palace, at the same time the navy and the Dutch army were put on alert and the destruction programmed.
In Belgium on May 10 at 12:20 a.m., the General Headquarters gave the order to be ready to carry out the destruction, and the 750,000 Belgian soldiers were alerted.
At 12:30 a.m., the French ambassador in Brussels, Paul Bargeton telephones Paul Reynaud, who combines the duties of Minister of Foreign Affairs and President of the Council, to confirm the imminent attack.
At the same time, in Luxembourg, the army is put on alert. The Minister of France also telephoned the Quai d’Orsay.

– 1:30 a.m., all Belgian army posts receive the code word: “René”. This is the real alert! The various regiments go up in line from the Meuse to the Ardennes, the airports are alerted and the fort of Eben-Emaël fires the six regulatory cannon shots, to confirm the commotion.
– 2:50 a.m., the Grand Duchess of Luxembourg and her husband leave the capital and head for the French border. It is the road of exile, and of resistance.
At 3 a.m., the German action begins. While the paratroopers prepare to jump on their objectives, the planes take off to bomb Allied airfields.

Shortly after 3:00 a.m., significant aircraft crossings were reported in Belgium, coming from the east. The German bombers invade the sky, the DCA fires. Dijxhoorn personally calls the central air guard service.

– 3:30 a.m., the navy services announce the first bombardments in Waalhaven and Bergen.

– 3:35 a.m. the Luxembourg alert network of Vernier reports the taking possession of the bridges over the Sûre and the Moselle. They will be crossed an hour later by the Wehrmacht.

– 3:45 a.m., in Belgium, the order to fire the road destruction is transmitted to the groups of bomb disposal experts of Saint-Vith, Burg, Reuland, Gouvry and Sommerain for the sector of the 3rd regiment of Ardennes hunters. The first bridges and roads are blown up within minutes.

Finally, at 3.50 a.m. the headquarters of the Dutch land forces at Korte Voorhout announced the thrust of the Panzers in the direction of Arnheim and Roermond, while Colonel van Alphen Deputy Chief of Staff warned General Winkelman: “Crossings of the border at Vaals and Kerkrade. »

France calmly awaits an inevitable shock

“We will win, because we are the strongest” proclaimed Paul Reynaud on September 10, 1939, when as Minister of the Economy, he had just raised the finances of France.

Two months earlier, on July 4, General Weygand had just affirmed in Lille: “I believe that the French army has an even greater value than at any time in its history: it has top quality equipment, first-rate fortifications, excellent morale and a remarkable High Command. »

In those early days of May 1940, American tankers were still unloading tons of oil in French ports, the major refineries were running at full speed, the specially-built strategic tanks were full to the brim, as were the supply and fuel depots. armament.

Millions of men, even if they have been forced to twiddle their thumbs for eight months, know that the end is near and await it with an impatience shared by the whole population: “Let it be over once for all ! »

We find the same determination in the factories that are running at full capacity. President Daladier entrusted Raoul Dautry with the mission of completing the rearmament and silenced any dispute. The sacred union is made. For the past two years, he has eliminated any threat of sabotage or civil coup d’etat, by attacking the hard core formed by the communist leaders under the orders of Moscow, but also the reactionary ultra-right forces. Employers and unions marched, willy-nilly, hand in hand, and the Communist deputies and the nationalist right ended up voting with the same impetus for the credits necessary for intensive rearmament.

Gold reserves are sufficient to pay for arms ordered abroad and ensure domestic production.

As of May 10, dozens of tanks, guns and planes leave the factories scattered throughout the country every day.
France is ready, and awaits the enemy firmly.

The whole of France ? …

With the exception of the entire French army, which is sleeping…

Officially, in Paris, there is no reason to expect an attack.

General Gamelin, Commander-in-Chief of the Allied armies, who went to bed around 10 p.m., is sleeping soundly in his fortress of Vincennes and the General Headquarters seems to have been transformed into the castle of Sleeping Beauty…
Not only have we not sent a single man, not a cannon to the front line to try to fill this breach denounced for months, but everyone is on vacation!
It’s Pentecost weekend and the permissions, logically suspended on April 14, were restored on the 26th. In some units up to 15% of the workforce is missing!

Generals Prételat and Billotte, responsible for the northern front from Dunkirk to Alsace, General Besson who commands the 3rd Army Group stationed in southern Alsace, as well as General Bourret who commands the 5th Army in northern Alsace, are absent.

Of the 94 French divisions on the North-East front, 78 no longer have leaders!

Lack of command which was not without worrying the Secret Services. However, on May 9, at the Army headquarters in Paris, when Commander Baril of the 2nd office suggested to General Colson, head of staff, to recall the leave, the latter gave him this “surprising” response: “Recall the leavers? To do what ? They won’t have to fight tomorrow! Germany is falling apart! »
(Quoted by the encyclopedia “Contemporary France” – 1971)

While the German Democratic officers of the OKH risked their lives to ensure the Allied victory, the same evening General Huntziger, commanding the Second Army on which the full weight of the attack would bear, was at his headquarters in Senuc and prepared to calmly inaugurate the soldier’s home in Vouziers.

Lieutenant-Colonel Paquin, head of the 3rd Bureau will accompany him. While he is getting dressed, one of the men in his service, Captain de Lombarès, informs him that a Belgian civil engineer has just informed him that the German attack is expected for the next day at dawn. .

Paquin’s response: “Okay, put it all in writing for me…”

Before leaving, Huntziger stopped at the headquarters of the 18th Army Corps at Dun-sur-Meuse and entered the third office, where Commander Rollot was watching. That evening, Rollot noted in his travel diary: “Around 8 p.m., General Huntziger came to my office. I tell him that our airmen have taken pictures on the Sûre, that many footbridges there appear to have been recently built. The general replies that it can only be exercises and he adds, a little briskly: “The Germans are not crazy! They are not going to risk putting the 26 Belgian divisions on their ass right now by violating Belgium! “Then he takes his staff to Vouziers, 50 kilometers from Sedan, to attend, in full evening dress, at the Stella cinema, a performance of the army theater: 20 animated songs, directed by Xavier de Courville followed by the comedy: Forced Marriage, play by Molière in one act.

He will join his headquarters in Senuc on May 10, at two o’clock in the morning.

As for Republican General Corap, commanding the 9th Army also involved in the foreground, he is at his post. Awakened at 4:45 a.m. by the warning sirens of his HQ in Vervins, he returned to his office with his orderly Captain Audigier and had his men hurriedly awakened.

However, the alert order No. 3 will not reach him until 6 a.m. and the start-up order will not be given until 6:30 a.m.

Time to wake up the troops and get them ready, most large units won’t move until noon. Either twelve hours late, at best, for the lightest!

When every minute counts…

And this scenario, reoccurring all over the front, heavily penalizes the Dyle-Breda maneuver which planned to block the German advance as quickly and as far as possible.

Thus, the first divisions: 3rd DLC, 1st Brigade of Spahis, and 5th combat tank battalion (BCC) which were to enter Luxembourg as soon as the neutrality of the territory was violated, will only enter it from 7.30 a.m., i.e. four hours after the attack, to find themselves almost immediately facing the advanced elements of the Wehrmacht. French “aid” thus stops just a few kilometers from the border.

According to certain authors who seem to find this quite normal, the Intelligence Services would not have informed the highest French officials of anything.

However, in addition to the information provided by his SRs, it is difficult to claim that the generalissimo did not expect it a little, since on December 16, 1939, when he received his friend Jules Romain in Vincennes, he confided to him: “J ‘imagine that the current period of immobility will be broken by an action in which we will play everything… The decision will then come much faster than we think… Yes, it will be fast and terrible! »
And when Romain asks him about the probable date, his friend replies frankly: “The end of January is not out of the question. Then after reflection: “May. Yes, May. It’s more likely. »
And just as difficult for him and his generals to ignore, the day before, the main headlines of the Parisian daily newspapers: On May 9, Le jour écho de Paris, announces: “Alert in the Netherlands. A real atmosphere of mobilization in Holland. Special precautions have been taken on the coasts. The population is calm. Holland will thus have, after the recall of the pensioners under the colors, the most numerous army that it has ever possessed during its history. The Journal displays on the front page: “Holland, which is mobilizing all its forces, is waiting, sure of itself, for events. »
As for the joke that goes around in the army, it pretty much sums up the general feeling:
– Did you see, the Dutch recalled the leavers?
“Fortunately we are not Dutch…”

These few facts, known to all, illustrate what some describe as an “inexplicably misappropriated view of events”. Admirable understatement…

The king of the tale finally wakes up

It was therefore at 6.30 a.m. that General Gamelin finally appeared.

According to Minart: “His face betrays no apparent emotion, no inner turmoil. The Commander-in-Chief retained that supple calm and that somewhat sweet affability which contributed so much to giving his person that charm of seduction, which those who had only superficial or worldly contact with him were rarely able to resist.
Perky after a peaceful night’s rest, he then sent the elite of the Allied forces to the aid of Holland and Belgium. Right in the trap that he is supposed to know perfectly well even if, even today, historiographers around the world persist in pretending to ignore the reliable and cross-checked information available to his staff.

One of the problems that this investigation will pose for us will therefore be to define to what extent the supreme commander of the Allied armies – whose brain was seriously affected by the devastating effects of syphilis and who was being treated in the greatest secrecy in the military hospital of the Val de Grâce – was or was not informed of the events by the close guard of his staff officers surrounding him day and night in his castle of Vincennes, controlling the visitors as, perhaps, the information he appropriate, or not, to transmit to him. This would allow us to think that Gamelin, placed at the head of the Army by Pétain and kept in his post by Daladier, could have been the appropriate puppet to take responsibility for the defeat.

So, while the latter, seeming totally unaware of the realities, went whistling to give the order to his best divisions to throw themselves into the “Belgian trap”, the German armored columns of army group A, which had become “invisible walk towards Sedan.

[1] See the details of this trap set for the Luftwaffe in volumes 2 and 5 of the series The Great Lie of the Twentieth Century.

TO BUY VOLUME 1 OF THE “THE GREAT LIE OF THE 20TH CENTURY” SERIES

Excerpts from Volume 7 of the Great Lie of the 20th Century Series On sale at:

A very, very “blind” justice

Everyone knows by what means, the State, and its great deputy Justice, were able to enforce the omerta on military treason until the beginning of the 21st century, since, on July 23, 1945, when the trial opened of Marshal Pétain, if the indictment had correctly retained:

“Crime of attack against the internal security of the State and intelligence with the enemy with a view to favoring his enterprises in correlation with his.”

The first accusation made at the beginning of the trial by the Prosecutor was dismissed: “Military treason”

Result: As in Riom, the slightest allusion to military treason and the Cagoulard plot against the Republic was banned from the debates.
A sad reality recalled by the trial archives for August 6, 1945: On that day, an officer who had the misfortune to mention the case of General Huntziger by declaring at the outset: “The hooded General Huntziger, affected at the opening of Sedan on May 12, 1940 to the Wehrmacht”, was retorted outright by President Montgibaux, who had taken the oath to Pétain in 1941 and eagerly applied the laws of Vichy against the Resistance fighters and opponents: “He It is not, at present, about the Cagoule, but about the responsibility of Marshal Pétain in the policy which was practiced especially after the armistice. »

Couldn’t be clearer! Thus the military witnesses of the prosecution could not ignore that during this trial led by the henchmen of Vichy against their former boss, only the facts of collaboration would be judged.

Or how to throw for the second time into the overflowing dustbins of History, but by the Republic this time, the hooded special sections and the phantom tanks of Bulson, the desertions of officers, the betrayals of generals and all that risked harm the good arrangement of the tale so well proposed by the good Marshal Pétain.

Thus, according to the good principle that one should not awaken old wounds and ask questions likely to harm the authority of the State, – universal excuse – the consensus was reached, and the witnesses were silent on pain of see condemned for “contempt” and their remarks censored again.
This made it possible to quickly forget the fate of Marx Dormoy, Minister of the Interior of the Popular Front who led the hunt for the Cagoulards and was assassinated by the militia under Vichy. From Georges Mandel MP and Minister of the Popular Front, resistance fighter from the start and assassinated in July 1944, again by the Militia. De Jean Zay also deputy and minister assassinated in June of the same year, but also the dozens of deputies placed under house arrest after their unfortunate attempt to reach Algiers aboard the Massilia to form a Republican Government in exile.
Others “forgotten” by history, those who, since the end of the war, have never ceased to question the fable of the State, such as Mr. Pierre Chenevier, President of the Federation of Friends of Fighting France who , in 1973 during the presentation of the insignia of Commander of the Legion of Honor to Mr. Pierre Mondanel, resistant and deported, head of the general control of the Judicial Police who resumed with stubbornness and in spite of pressure from Vichy the investigation into the Cagoule after the assassination of Marx Dormoy, recalled: “The most active Cagoulards were prosecuted, a certain number arrested by the services of the General Security, but you found them in 1940, in Vichy, in the forefront of the revolution. national. They held the levers of control in the government. It should be noted that the Third Reich was quick to release from prison all those who had been arrested. »

And Mr. Baudier, mayor of Vouziers and president of the Ardennes association, those who fought, pointed out to us in his work entitled: that: “Strangely, we note the disappearance of the Memoirs of Pierre Mondanel, the policeman who dismantled the Cagoule, manuscript deposited after his death by his family at the National Library. »
End of quote (Baudier Doors open at Sedan)

Decidedly, it seems that the archives of France during this period were very much the prey of the “rats” of the Ministry of Defense, without this disturbing our Governments much…

Another subject of “no astonishment”: Inspector General Pierre Mondanel who was placed on leave with pay by Vichy until November 1943, then dismissed after his arrest as a leader of a resistance network and deported to Buchenwald, Lindau and Dachau, was expelled from the police at the Liberation!

And we better understand the logic of the magistrates of the purge who, at the Liberation, dismissed Pierre Mondanel from his duties as Inspector General of the Police, when everything pointed to him to become its chief. Glad we didn’t throw him in jail for his participation in the anti-fascist struggle!

And how can we still be surprised that elected officials, such as Mr. Baudier, are still today demanding justice for these men and for all the victims of this betrayal, therefore of this century:

“Convinced Republican, I hope that we apply the motto of our homeland: Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. Where is freedom when you cannot access the truth because it is deliberately camouflaged? Where is the equality in choosing among the dead those to honor and those to forget? Where is the brotherhood vis-à-vis ALL the civilian and military victims of this atrocious war where the industry of death was invented?

The blood that permeates our land demands that the truth come out of the well!!
It also demands that young people be informed not of filmed nonsense, a source of colossal profits, but of what their families have experienced and what may happen to them tomorrow.
Information is one of the essential needs of citizens! There’s still much to do ! »
End of quote (Harness Doors open at Sedan page 6)

Finally, we have also discarded the fact, very opportunely recalled by Mrs. Lacroix Riz, a leading revisionist historian, that there was no more “purging” in France than in Germany or anywhere else in Europe, and that most of the senior civil and military officials who had led the fight against the Resistance and the allied forces on all fronts had either been condemned and pardoned quickly, or not worried at all, and found themselves very shortly after the Liberation again to the highest places in the state. The Maurice Papon case was far, and even very, very far, from being exceptional! In fact, it was rather the rule.

The French State, major organizer, judge and executioner

As for all the witnesses who would have spoken anyway, because for them it was a question of defending their lives, they were executed after a sham trial that any banana dictatorship would not have denied, during the so-called period of “Purification” – meaning by this, elimination of troublesome witnesses.

Such as that of Pierre Laval, which General Jauneaud comments as follows: “The investigation of the Laval trial ended on September 12, 1945, after six interrogations. The 18 parliamentary jurors are chosen and not drawn by lot. The trial takes place in the absence of the lawyers, who are unable to defend their client.

On October 6, 1945, faced with the partiality of the declarations, the insults and the threats of his judges, Pierre Laval declared: “a judicial crime is going to be accomplished. I want to be the victim. I do not agree to be an accomplice! His lawyers withdrew: “The honor and prestige of our order forbid us to associate ourselves with debates which are only judicial in name! »

On October 9, Laval was sentenced to death. He was shot five days later, on October 15.

Thus disappeared the statesman who was most conscious of the dangers posed to France by the stifling of the truth concerning the international conspiracy, and the treason which brought about the defeat and slavery of our country. (emphasis mine)

Then Jauneaud quotes a few sentences that Laval said to him, including: “France is not liberated because we don’t want her to know the truth!! »

End of quote (Jauneaud I accuse Marshal Pétain page 570)

Knowing that Pierre Laval was the man of the French cartels, in close contact throughout the war with the Americans through his son-in-law, Count René de Chambrun, descendant of Lafayette, possessing dual Franco-American nationality, nephew by marriage of Theodore Roosevelt (president from 1901 to 1909) therefore cousin of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and darling of Pétain who nicknamed him “rabbit”. But above all that, well beyond these family considerations, he was a business lawyer in close contact with the great interests of Wall Street that we know, therefore with Charles Bedaux and of course a certain Jean Monnet, the main architect of what will be the new European Union brought in the luggage of the American “Liberators”.

Wasn’t there actually every interest in silencing this embarrassing witness, the essential political pivot of this combination between Big Black French international capital and Wall Street, as quickly as possible?

“Tell me my dear that when there’s a bad deal brewing, there’s always a Republic to save!”

The President (film by Henri Verneuil, dialogues Michel Audiard)

And since we are talking about the victims of “Justice” in the way of purifying the Republicans, why not mention General Jauneaud, a convinced Republican, one of the main architects of the restoration of the Air Force under the Popular Front , of which it is established today that he was the victim of what is agreed to call an “unfortunate miscarriage of justice” at the Liberation, which described very well the political context which was to preside over his trial:

“General De Gaulle is dangerously weakened by the civil war situation in which we find ourselves, while Roosevelt and Churchill are undermining the authority of the provisional government, in order to be able to develop their actions hostile to our overseas empire.

Moreover, the American and British secret services are based in Paris. They exert a strong pressure on the personalities of the Resistance of which they were the financiers. There is every reason to think that will particularly go after those who have shown their desire to defend our empire. »

Everyone at this stage of our investigation, if they take care to read these lines carefully, will understand why I underlined such a long passage. Each word, each sentence, contains in substance all the hidden stakes of this betrayal, therefore of this terrible world conflict of five years.
“On October 27, 1944, I was arrested and imprisoned in Fresnes. I take as defender Master Combescure, who tells me: “You are dangerously threatened. The violence and relentlessness of the attacks directed against you are out of proportion to the facts with which you are charged! »

Jauneaud then asked for the summons of several witnesses: including the former Air Minister of the Popular Front Pierre Cot, Joxe, Litvinov, etc. and the disclosure of its note on the existence of the

“Document Vuillemin”, bearing on the responsibilities of General Vuillemin Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force, in the defections of the hunt and the bombardment during the battle in May-June 1940.

But: “On January 8, 1945, Maître Berry came to tell me that the Minister of Justice refused to summon the witnesses cited. “Since the beginning of my career, he adds, this is the first time that I have recorded such a decision. »

And on February 27, I was told that I was summoned to appear before the court of justice of the department of the Seine on March 3, 1945 at 3 p.m. I am charged with having maintained, in time of war, intelligence with the enemy, a crime provided for by articles 75 and 76 of the penal code. The indictment considers me to be “blinded by the pecuniary temptations of Laval”. (-) The charges against me are both ridiculous and serious. They are obviously intended to send me to the execution post… Moreover, the refusal to hear the defense witnesses transforms the judgment into a judicial crime. Indeed I am considered by some secret services as an embarrassing witness. The Pétainists, the Germans, the English and the Americans have, for different reasons, an interest in preventing the revelation of the truth concerning the treason, as well as the international conspiracy directed against France and its overseas empire. When a witness becomes a little too embarrassing, we delete it…”

Either a perfect summary of what we think we have established…

Let us now see what price he will have to pay for his contribution to historical truth: “After the pleadings, and the indictment which asks the jurors to pronounce my death sentence, I take the floor: “the tree must not hide the forest ! There are no Jauneaud cases. On the other hand, the Vuillemin affair seems to me as serious as the Dreyfus affair. It reveals the circumstances under which we capitulated in Munich, the opening of the “Sedan Gate” to Hitler, the assassination of the Third Republic, and Vichy’s collaboration with the enemy!…”

I am sentenced to forced labor for life. I don’t want to quibble. »

This is how we treated the generals who had devoted themselves to serving the Republic by trying to rearm in time, then clearly denouncing the members of the plot! When the French state failed to murder them in rigged trials, it sentenced them to forced labor for life!

General Jauneaud, another victim of ministers of worship

In the long section of dismissed witnesses, General Jauneaud, director of the cabinet and main collaborator of Pierre Cot, holds a place of choice, since as an embarrassing witness he will find himself at the Liberation falsely accused of “collaboration” with the occupier, this with the active complicity of the French Government of the Fourth Republic, then properly placed on the index of History, as evidenced by Gérard Watelet, director of Éditions Pygmalion (now bought by Flammarion), who dared to publish the general’s book in 1977:
“Warning: The author of this book, hero of the 1914-1918 war, airman general, was sentenced to forced labor for life on March 15, 1945 by the High Court of Justice of the Seine. Released by decision of President Vincent Auriol on January 3, 1951, he was granted amnesty on February 18, 1954. With hindsight and also thanks to the examination of the various documents that we had in hand, it now seems established that this conviction was a miscarriage of justice. In fact Jauneaud was considered, both by his detractors and by Pétain himself, as an embarrassing witness who had to be silenced at all costs… Also, the author, in the last thirty-one years of his life , he persisted in dismantling the mechanism of the injustice of which he had been the victim. He was accumulating military evidence of what he denounced as an anti-republican plot fomented by the Pétainist clan between 1934 and 1940, very notably shedding light on the drama of our Air Force. This is why it seemed important and fair to us to allow General Jauneaud, now deceased, to add his testimony to the file of contemporary history. Signed: The publisher. »
End of quote (Jauneaud I accuse Marshal Pétain Warning page 5)

Many historians who were among the first revisionists, such as Henri Guillemin, author of The Truth About the Pétain Affair and of so many books of primary importance, also recognized the importance of Jauneaud.

Here is the preface of this excellent author: “This is an important book, a considerable testimony. It is possible that, in detail, statements that are a little too categorical remain, which I do not say are contrary to the truth, but only that they still lack formal proof to support them and make the deposition invulnerable. These proofs will undoubtedly see the light of day (-)

But the essential remains, and untouched. And where is this essential?

He bears the responsibility, discreet but infinitely heavy, of Marshal Pétain for the disaster of 1940. (-)

General Jauneaud’s work will take its place in the “subject’s bibliography” among the least insignificant sources of information. »

Finally, General Jauneaud received the support of Colonel Goutard, whose outspokenness is legendary among historians: “Air Corps General Henri Jauneaud deserves to be read with as much more attention as his views future, between the two wars, were extraordinarily lucid and even prophetic. He was, in fact, for the large air units, the same precursor that were, for the large armored units, the de Gaulle, Liddell Hart, Fuller and Guderian. (-)

Trainee at the war school from 1920 to 1922, he submitted a conclusive report on the “need to provide France with large air bombing and fighter units” which would act in conjunction with large tank-based shock units, towed artillery and mounted infantry. Assigned to the general staff of the army, on leaving the war school, he had the honor of serving under the orders of General Buat, one of the best military brains in our history. The latter approved his project and decided to provide France with a real air force. He therefore instructed him to write an Instruction on the tactical employment of large air units, which he signed on October 9, 1923.
This instruction, which provided for the creation of 186 squadrons – including 38 for heavy and very heavy bombardment, grouped into a mixed brigade and air division – placed in the hands of the commander-in-chief in time of war an “air reserve”, ready to intervene massively. in the battle, at the crucial point, and to create, with terrifying suddenness, the “event” of which Napoleon spoke.(-)

On December 22, 1923, General Buat disappeared, suddenly taken away by a crushing illness, his “doctrine”, in May, disappeared with him. His training was forgotten, and a few months later his technical adviser, Commander Jauneaud, was assigned to Rio de Janeiro where, for eight years from 1924 to 1932, he was able to teach his aerial doctrine… To the Brazilians!
And in September 1939, when the Second World War broke out, we would have neither the armored divisions demanded by Charles De Gaulle, nor the aerial divisions which had been provided for by the Buat-Jauneaud instruction of 1923. (-)

Was the Sedan Gate, in fact, opened to panzers and the Luftwaffe, and for some reason other than military?

Let the author, who has such a clear vision of the future, answer this agonizing question of the past. »

End of quote (preface by Colonel Goutard)

Invitation to which the witness responded as best he could with a sincerity that has guided us more than once in our long investigation into military treason and the plot that presided over it.

And all of this brings us to the admonition of General Gamelin who reminded future generations that they would have to shed light on this betrayal: “For our country to truly become a great power again, the high moral and intellectual force necessary humanity, which it was and must remain, it must both rebuild its union and condemn irremissibly those who have led it to worse than defeat, at the risk of shame. »

End of quote (Gamelin Servir volume 1 Introduction page XV)

But were they heard? Do we have proof today that the States concerned have done anything other than maintain the “family secret”?

The question is therefore: What higher interests did the successive governments of France, as of all the States concerned, want to defend?

A question that Pierre Laval or General Jeaunaud could probably have answered, at least if we judge by the conclusion that the latter gave in his indictment:

And I add this: the presence at the three hearings of my trial of two English officers is not accidental in the precincts of a court assembled to condemn to silence the one who was the youngest general of the army. French, the one who knew too much…” (emphasis mine)

End of quote (Jauneaud I accuse Marshal Pétain pages 158, 160, 166)

LESSONS TO BE LEARNED

We have seen this throughout our investigation:

Everything, absolutely everything, is FALSE in this “incomprehensible” version. NOTHING stands up in this fairy tale as soon as it is confronted with the archives and the most elementary logic.

Whether on a purely military, political or economic level, the lies pile up and their coherence is only apparent.

Thus this systematic dam to the truth has made the history of the Second World War a bottomless quagmire, where today we find everything and anything. And this without control of the Peoples, since each adept of the “theory of illogicality” having developed his religion according to the policy he serves, and the whole having been taken up and mixed at leisure by the most diverse media, more no one is there!

Result: These “forces of evil” presented in a Manichaean way can at choice, and according to the political convictions of the author, apply to fascism, communism, liberalism, the ideology of evil, or the divine will. , for the proposition is true in every sense…

This is why the official fairy tale, in that it offers the unequaled advantage of satisfying everyone, by allowing anything to be said without a clearly defined reality being opposed to it, and because it makes this instrumentalization of history possible for anyone, was, is, and will remain if it continues, a real danger for any democracy!

State secrecy, an attack on the rights of peoples

It is therefore appropriate to violently denounce this perversion, reminding these improvised moral censors that History is waiting at any moment to be able to be revised:

“The writing of history consists of an endless revision of the past. The actual reality of history demands to be considered along with its possibilities” John Lukaks

“Any truth is good for the historian to say, even and especially that which upsets prejudices, clashes with received ideas, or partisan interests.” Raymond Aron

“As Academician Jean d’Ormesson wrote: ‘If you deny freedom to those who make mistakes, there is no more freedom. To defend freedom is to defend these abuses. What I interpret as follows:“ we must not deny freedom to those who, according to you, are wrong. Because then you will only know if it is not you who are mistaken.”  Nerin E. Gun

This is the true duty of historians!

And not, as at the time of the Inquisition, to ensure orthodoxy, using any pretext to excommunicate anyone!

Because this is what awaits the revisionist researcher, if he dares to challenge the “incomprehensible” thesis. If he dares to question the imposed dogma!

Moreover, we all know in France to live it daily, that certain words have become likely to condemn, at first sight, those who would use them.

This is why all historians, without exception, have never dared to use the term “treason”, but preferred those of “strange” victory or defeat, varying at will and playing on words! I mentioned in the introduction, a “suspicion of good quality”…

In truth, we are here within the framework of propaganda: It was a question for certain “experts” and accredited media of establishing a new dictionary, based on political correctness, in order to manipulate underhandedly by the incessant repetition of arguments lies, opinions and consciences.

Consider the “factory of consent” invented in 1917 by Edward Berneys, father of modern advertising and state propaganda, in order to convince the American people to go to war, and so violently denounced by Mr. Noam Chomsky.

Revisionism is not Holocaust denial  

And I am thinking here just as much of the amalgam systematically proposed to the widest public by certain media, between historians quite rightly qualified as “negationists”, because they question the Shoa and other massacres organized by the Nazis, and the “revisionists since, playing on the imprecision of the formulas and a certain consonance of the words, these censors of all political persuasions will immediately attack, or boycott, a researcher who would question the thesis of the mythical Blitzkrieg and its string of miracles, by qualifying it of “negationist”!

By an incredible intellectual pirouette, in their mouths the word “revisionist” becomes offensive, and this even if the archives presented by the historian are irrefutable!

The unfortunate will then be seen as a henchman of Nazism, eager to contest the victory of the “forces of Good against that of Evil”, as soon as he pronounces the word “treason”.

And if, supreme offence, he dared to question the dogma of the industrial and military power of the Reich, or to evoke the contributions of Big International Capital, he would be accused of sacrificing to conspiracy theses!

Finally, if he takes too close an interest in Hitler’s true personality, or in the “miracles” that allowed him to cross the Ardennes and the Meuse, he is undermining the very foundations of religion!

And we cry anathema!

This is why it is never in vain to remind these so-called servants of “democracy” of the principles of our Republic:

“The free communication of thoughts and opinions is one of the most precious rights of man: every citizen can therefore speak, write, print freely, except to answer for the abuse of this freedom in the cases determined by law.”

Article 11 of the 1993 Declaration of Human Rights

Or this sentence from Condorcet’s speech when he presented to the Assembly his project for a secular and free “School of the Republic”:

“Since this is a matter of public instruction, to tolerate an error would be to become an accomplice to it; not to consecrate truth highly would be to betray it. And even if it were true that political consideration should still, for some time, sully the laws of a free nation; when this insidious or weak doctrine would find an excuse in this stupidity, which one likes to suppose in the people to have a pretext to deceive or oppress them; at least, the instruction which must bring the time when these consideration will be useless, can belong only to the truth alone, and must belong to it entirely.”

Nicolas de Condorcet speech on The general organization of public instruction (April 20 and 21, 1792)

“The Truth alone must belong to him entirely. »

A truth undoubtedly much less comfortable than the “family secret”. But you have to choose which world you want to live in!

The law, ultimate instrument of Omerta

Especially since the official dogma is imposed by many States with extreme violence, since in addition to their alleged legitimacy to hide certain disturbing truths in order not to impose on the Peoples “for their good” certain shocking truths, we find the tools of this condemnation to “silence for life” in their laws.

Another instrument of authority, and how effective, because any historian likely to denounce certain historical lies thus exposes himself to the vagaries of lawsuits for defamation.

Lawsuits brought either by the defendant or by his descendants, and the outcome of which is generally not in doubt since the judges, having no means of apprehending for themselves the quality of the protester’s writings, appoint “experts in the matter.

Experts who are of course authoritative at the highest level of the Army and the State, and recognized by all those who granted them the distinctions and prebends guaranteeing the “quality” of their judgment.

And the circle is complete. Here is the accused delivered to the appreciation of “experts”, who are none other than those he implicates!

The real question, and the only solution to this dilemma, is therefore to ask the Peoples to rule on the legitimacy of these civil courts. For is there, outside the Gayssot law relating to the crime of denial of the Holocaust and other theses denying war crimes, a single article of law allowing any civil judge to rule on the validity of a thesis history on an aspect of this conflict?

Whether military or economic?

And the answer is known to all lawyers: None.
So where is the rule of law in this case?

Of the spirit of Laws

And since we are talking about intimidation, let’s go back for a moment to this famous Gayssot law which, in France, claims to impose a historical truth concerning the Shoa. In this regard, even if obviously I do not question this evidence of the holocaust, I wonder about the merits of a law capable of regulating historical research, and about the existence of a repressive arsenal that can lead a researcher, whoever he is, to prison.

Indeed, Barthélémy Saint-Hilaire, republican philosopher, historian, statesman, wrote in 1849 that: “The citizen owes the fatherland the fruit of his meditations.” This little treatise, published by the Academy of Moral and Political Sciences, establishes the democratic principles:

Laws are made to serve, not to oppress. Except, of course, if the purpose of the author is to harm common morality and “the very peace of the city and the existence of the State”.

But how could the Truth harm the City? In nothing. A proposition that is not necessarily true for the state…

In short, we do not impose a historical thesis by the stick!

The Gayssot law in that its application prohibits, under penalty of judicial condemnation, any dialogue on certain subjects, limits in practice any controversy, therefore consequently the field of research, since in the historical field, EVERYTHING is linked.
I am well aware that the legislator seems to have sought to do justice for the victims of the Holocaust, and he was right in his intentions, but the danger is that in wanting to establish a moral order he has, in fact, limited the search by putting limits to the confrontations of ideas, therefore of archives, between those who are wrong and those who are right.

And this is not tolerable since History is not a field of religious, timeless reflection, there is no question of faith, it is not immutable, but remains alive, current and influential. , present in our everyday life, at least as long as it remains revisable…
The trap into which this law has led French society is thus obvious: By freezing part of its history, the State ratifies, voluntarily or not, the fairy tale, and this regardless of the validity of the moral pretext put forward by the legislator.
To be sure, let’s take a simple example: IG Farben, a chemical manufacturer whose capital and real leaders, following various financial arrangements perfectly recognized by researchers around the world, were mostly Americans. This multinational employed thousands of deportees in its factory located in the heart of the Dachau concentration camp causing the death of many of them and, as a result, shamefully enriched the American State, Wall Street and the small shareholders of this country, even after the United States entered the war.

This is an indisputable and undisputed reality, moreover one of the countless scandals of this war. What is less known is that, under the pretext of protecting the general public from any negationist influence, we avoid talking about this kind of subject!

The argument thus makes it possible to avoid any confrontation of ideas and figures and to evacuate not only the subject, but its corollaries. Thus the unlimited exploitation and the death of tens of thousands of deportees becomes an excellent argument for insidiously “forgetting” to see where a reflection freely carried out on this burning subject of profits, and other political and financial issues, could lead us.
The Gayssot law is therefore, in fact, yet another screen in that it serves, by relying on the reality of the Holocaust, to conceal this disturbing aspect, whereas, as I have said and repeat, while waiting to demonstrate it as surely as this military betrayal: This war, like all those that followed, was not only that of democracies against totalitarianism, this was only the tip of the iceberg. In reality, these hundreds of millions of deaths were sacrificed on the altar of profit!

This is why I oppose this law which could be used tomorrow to protect the real culprits whom I denounce. Because how far will the state be able to extend it? How far will the maneuvers of the self-righteous go, to continue to impose the only “politically correct” versions?

Which brings us back to the will of the Peoples. Because the question of course arises: Will they want to open their eyes?

Or will they prefer to continue to let overly curious historians be muzzled, and condemn innocent people such as General Gamelin or General Jauneaud, “for their greater good”?

Democracy in question

Questions that the revisionists will undoubtedly soon have to ask them, because these judges are demanding tens of thousands of euros in fines from these myth busters and whistleblowers!

And we unfortunately understand why, faced with this concrete threat brandished by a “democracy” using without limits what it calls “state secrecy”, and capable of ruining a career, a reputation and even a life, all historians did not have the same taste for risk, and why the most “reasonable” have continued to consider that the three volumes of General Gamelin’s Souvenirs were nothing but a vulgar partisan plea without the slightest historical value. Why NONE of those who have established their reputation for so many years by publishing numerous works often rewarded by so many academies, considered it essential to look into the new archives of the battle opened in the year 2000. Finally, why no one , neither in France nor elsewhere, has denounced loud and clear the theft of the Journal de Marche du Cabinet Gamelin and the other essential documents on which all the major witnesses were no doubt counting to shed light on the whole affair in good time. Flight yet perfectly known to all.

Omerta on the archives coupled with constant propaganda, as recalled by Noam Chomsky, considered by his peers to be the most brilliant intellectual of the century:
“Propaganda is to democracy what the truncheon is to dictatorship. (-) Indoctrination is in no way incompatible with democracy. Rather, it is, as some have noted, its very essence. (-) If the State loses its baton and if force no longer operates and if the people raise their voice, then this problem appears. People become so arrogant that they refuse civil authority. You have to control their thoughts. To do so, we resort to propaganda, to the fabrication of the necessary consensus of illusions. »
Noam Chomsky, American Focus Student Radio Interview

Countless obstacles accumulated by the highest academic, political and military authorities of ALL democracies, which have been denounced for nearly sixty years by revisionist historians, without their complaints ever being heard by the media.

So the question is: What other shameful secrets are they all protecting?

Secrets of such importance that it is necessary to deprive the citizen of his most basic right: The freedom to choose his future in full knowledge of the real issues.

Everyone will have understood that the Vichy State and then the 4th and 5th Republics were keen to conceal the military betrayal.

However, if we can understand the interest of Pétain and his Cagoulard friends, and even of General de Gaulle, very busy restoring the prestige of France, we obviously understand less why and how this “family secret” was so long preserved from the 1960s to the present day.

In view of the position found by France within the concert of Nations, nothing justified such a departure from republican principles.

Another big question: Why haven’t the other democracies concerned revealed the pot of roses?

After all, if we can understand the attitude of Germany, the main accomplice, how can we understand that of the victims: England, Belgium, Holland etc…

There is of course something “incomprehensible” there and which we will of course see in great detail during our investigation to follow on the major imperial issues and those of the world cartels.

In the meantime, and since the purpose of this site of Angry Historians is to make you understand the reasons for our resentment, it is not in vain to teach you that the French revisionist researchers were not the only ones to be savagely fought so that the omerta remains.

To be certain, I offer three striking examples concerning three leading revisionist historians: In the United States, in England and in Germany.

Antony Sutton and the rumor

So let’s go back to Mr. Antony Sutton, economist and historian of British origin, researcher at Stanford University – where he was able to analyze thousands of archives concerning the responsibilities of Wall Street from the Hoover Foundation for five years –

Then a professor at the very famous University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) where the nation’s elite is trained;

It was he who, all names, dates and figures in support, denounced, from the 1960s, the part played by Wall Street in the coming to power of the Bolsheviks in Russia and Hitler in Germany, then the existing links between Wall Street and the great German and Russian trusts, and finally the extent of the responsibilities of the finest jewels of American industry in the rearmament of these two countries.

However, here is the article published about it – and still online in 2021 – on the famous participatory encyclopedia Wikipedia, well known for the fact that it offers everyone the possibility of integrating an article of their own, without any serious control. .

A particularly tendentious article, presenting this researcher recognized by all his colleagues and the best intellectuals for his honesty, as a leader of American conspiracy theorists!

Article that I reproduce here, according to my good habit, in its entirety, so as not to be suspected of counterfeiting:

Antony Cyril Sutton

Key data
Birth	14 February 1925
Dead	17 June 2002 (à 77 ans)
Nationalité	British
Profession	Essayist Economist

Antony Cyril Sutton, born February 14, 1925 and died June 17, 2002, was a British-born American economist and essayist, a historical figure of conspiracy theorist in the United States.

Biography

Sutton was a research fellow at Stanford in the Hoover Foundation from 1968 to 1973. He taught economics at UCLA. He studied in London, Göttingen and UCLA and received a doctorate in science from the University of Southampton, England. [ref. desired]

Theories

Historian Bernard Bruneteau observes that Sutton, “an ultra-conservative British economist turned American […] has constantly denounced since the 1970s the globalist projects of the American banking establishment, accused in addition of having favored both the advent of the Bolsheviks and Hitler in order to better control Russia and Germany in the future2. The works of the economist are thus praised by Pierre de Villemarest, journalist and writer of the extreme right, for whom “Sutton was the only author who has ever dissected the contracts thanks to which the Nazi and Soviet totalitarianisms were able to live and survive economically “.

In addition, Bernard Bruneteau notes that Alain Soral draws his references relating to a so-called “Jewish globalization by essence” in “old ideological channels”, those of “the current vulgate of the “Judeo-Bolshevism” of the entre- wars6″, but also among “authors of today, presented as ‘historians’ or experts on their subjects, but belonging more to a category of radical or marginal essayists, these ‘proletaroid intellectuals’ described in time by Max Weber7. ” Distributed by Equality and Reconciliation, the publications of Antony Sutton, Anne Kling and Daniel Estulin thus aim to “accredit the thesis of the common origin of the dual globalist impulse of the 20th century – liberal and Marxist. »

About the Skull & Bones Society

According to Sutton, the elite of Skull and Bones society would develop a vision of mass education advocating not individualism but integration into an organic society – a vision inspired by Hegel’s doctrine on the absolute state. In this type of state, the individual finds his freedom through obedience to the laws of the state. Individual liberties, for their part, must submit to a rational tyranny9. In addition, Sutton argues that Wilhelm Wundt’s theory of the similarities between animal and human psychology10 as well as Hegel’s notion of the conflict that creates history11 are integral to Skull & Bones ideology. Thus the conflict between a thesis and an antithesis gives a synthesis and if the thesis-antithesis process is under the control of this society, the synthesis will necessarily follow from its will. In this case, it is a question of the organization, by an elite society, of the conflict Marxism – Nazism with the aim of establishing a single world ideology [unclear] 11. For Sutton, the ultimate synthesis of Skull & Bones is the New World Order12. [not clear]

On the links between Wall Street and Franklin Delano Roosevelt

For Sutton, the action of Franklin Delano Roosevelt was done in the interest of American high finance by his New Deal and by other laws promulgated from 1933.

Works

Books in english :

• Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development: 1917-1930 (1968)
• Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development: 1930-1945 (1971)
• Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development: 1945-1965 (1973)
• National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union (1973)
• What Is Libertarianism? (1973)
• Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution (1974, 1999)
• Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler (1976, 1999)
• Wall Street and FDR (1976, 1999)
• The War on Gold: How to Profit from the Gold Crisis (1977)
• Energy: The Created Crisis (1979)
• The Diamond Connection: A manual for investors (1979)
• Trilaterals Over Washington – Volume I (1979; with Patrick M. Wood)
• Trilaterals Over Washington – Volume II (1980; with Patrick M. Wood)
• Gold vs Paper: A cartoon history of inflation (1981)
• Investing in Platinum Metals (1982)
• Technological Treason: A catalog of U.S. firms with Soviet contracts, 1917-1982 (1982)
• America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones (1983, 1986, 2002)
• How the Order Creates War and Revolution (1985)
• How the Order Controls Education (1985)
• The Best Enemy Money Can Buy (1986)
• The Two Faces of George Bush (1988)
• The Federal Reserve Conspiracy (1995)
• Trilaterals Over America (1995)
• Cold Fusion: Secret Energy Revolution (1997)
• Gold For Survival (1999)

Books in french :

• Le Complot de la Réserve Fédérale (2009) (Éditions Nouvelle Terre [archive])
• Wall Street et la Révolution bolchevique (2012) (Éditeur: Le Retour aux Sources [archive])
• Wall Street et l’ascension de Hitler (2012) (Éditeur: Le Retour aux Sources [archive])
• Le Pouvoir Secret Américain : l’Ordre de Skulls and Bones, éditions Hadès, 2015.

Notes and references

• Pierre-André Taguieff, « Un portrait hagiographique d’Antony C. Sutton, figure majeure du conspirationnisme américain, principal diffuseur de la vision diabolisatrice de la société « Skull & Bones » », in La Foire aux illuminés. Ésotérisme, Théorie du complot, Extrémisme, Paris, Mille et une nuits, 2005 (ISBN2-84205-925-5), pages 262 et suivantes.
• · Bruneteau 2015, p. 231, n. 25.
• · Olivier Dard, La synarchie ou le mythe du complot permanent, Paris, Perrin, coll. « Tempus » (n^o 469), 2012, 384 p. (ISBN 978-2-262-04101-4, notice BnF n^o FRBNF43781231, présentation en ligne [archive]), p. 189-190.
• · Pierre Péan, Le mystérieux docteur Martin (1895-1969), Paris, Librairie générale française (LGF), coll. « Le livre de poche » (n^o 13935), 1996, 535 p. (ISBN 978-2-253-13935-5, notice BnF n^o FRBNF36688158), p. 6 ; 497 ; 511.
• · Pierre de Villemarest, Les Sources financières du nazisme, éd. CEI, 93 p., 1984
• · Bruneteau 2015, p. 230.
• · Bruneteau 2015, p. 231.
• · America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones (Online version p. 62)
• · America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones (Online version, p. 73)
• · America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones (Online version p. 76)
• · America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones (Online version, p. 92)
• · Antony Cyril Sutton, America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones (Online version, p. 93)

1. ·  (en) Bruce W. Dearstyne, « Compte rendu du livre d’Antony Sutton, Wall Street and FDR, 1975 », History : Reviews of New Books, vol. 4, n° 2, Routledge, 1975, p. 44, DOI:10.1080/03612759.1975.9946031.

Appendices

• Authority records :
  • Fichier d’autorité international virtuel
  • International Standard Name Identifier
  • Bibliothèque nationale de France (données)
  • Système universitaire de documentation
  • Bibliothèque du Congrès
  • Gemeinsame Normdatei
  • Bibliothèque royale des Pays-Bas
  • Bibliothèque universitaire de Pologne
  • Bibliothèque nationale tchèque
  • WorldCat Id
  • WorldCat

Bibliography

• Bernard Bruneteau, « Les permanences de l’antisémitisme antimondialiste (fin XIX^e-début XXI^e siècle) », Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine, Paris, Belin, n^os 62-2/3 « Antisémitisme(s) : un éternel retour ? »,‎ avril-septembre 2015, p. 225-244 (lire en ligne [archive]).
• Pierre-André Taguieff, La foire aux illuminés : ésotérisme, théorie du complot, extrémisme, Paris, Mille et une nuits, coll. « Essai », 2005, 612 p. (ISBN 978-2-84205-925-5, notice BnF n^o FRBNF40110710, présentation en ligne [archive]).

External links

Other Wikimedia projects: :

• Antony Cyril Sutton, sur Wikiquote
• (en) Une entrevue avec Antony Sutton [archive]
• (en) [vidéo] Wall Street et l’avènement d’Hitler [archive], interview d’Anthony Sutton par Stan Monteith

In this article several characteristic points of the way of proceeding of the secret services, in order to discredit the people whose existence we would like to forget:

First, the article is skilfully written in such a way that an uninformed person can estimate that the most honest and prestigious historians would share the author’s analysis.

While not a word, not a quote supports this narrative bias.

Next, the anonymous author quotes Mr. Bernard Bruneteau, whose field of expertise and work have nothing to do with American imperialism and who, if he sometimes quotes Sutton, does so in a completely superficial way, and without ever accusing him of conspiracy;

Another expert quoted: Mr. Pierre André Taguieff, an excellent historian who has perfectly demonstrated the vices and hidden intentions of the conspiracy theses.
However, in his work cited in reference by the author of this article on Wikipedia, and entitled: the fair for the enlightened, Mr. Taguieff never puts Mr. Sutton in question!

In reality :

On the one hand, pages 262 and following of this work, given in demonstration of the highly conspiratorial vision of Mr. Sutton, do not speak of the subjects evoked by Sutton, but of totally different subjects, and without ever even mentioning closely or by far its name.

It is therefore a pure and simple fake.

On the other hand, the appended document, in which another author evokes the personality of Sutton and the quality of his work, is entirely in his favour. Far from assimilating it in any way to a conspiratorial thesis, on the contrary he praises Sutton and his works, admiring the quality of the archives presented and the seriousness of his research!

So, aside from perhaps the expanded and critical view of Skull and Bones society,

– American secret society founded at Yale University and to which the main figures of what I call the Big Black American Capital belonged, and still belong –

this article is a perfect demonstration of how some people are in charge of misinforming the Peoples.

Because what interest would any individual have in lying so blatantly?

It is clear that this historical fraudster took advantage of Wikipedia, and the fact that most people do not check the references provided, to smear Mr. Sutton’s memory and discredit his work.

Unfortunately for him, we read…

Another example of these attempts at demonization:

1. Martin Allen, et les services secrets britanniques

This excellent author to whom we owe two essential works for understanding the Second World War and the major issues of the 20th century: The King Who Betrayed and The Strange Journey of Rudolf Hess, also had to deal with the secret services, but British this time, and during his lifetime.

Indeed, in his last work dealing with the essential participation of Himmler – leader of the SS – in the plundering of Europe in favor of the Big black capital, Mr. Allen returns in detail to the existing links between the Big black capital, Wall Street, tax havens, and the Nazis, when it was necessary – during and after the war – to secure the precious booty.

He further asserts that Himmler would quite logically have been assassinated by the Allies, as so many prominent witnesses were, not only by the British, Americans and French, but also by the Germans, since Hitler had shortly before his death a few hundred essential witnesses, who could have denounced both the French military treason and the world conspiracy.

Here is the Wikipedia article regarding. Allen, still in its integral version

Martin Allen

For similar articles, see Allen.

Not to be confused with Martin Allen (soccer).

This UK-related article is a stub.

You can share your knowledge by improving it (how?) according to the recommendations of the corresponding projects.

Martin Allen

Biographie
Birth	1958

 

Nationality	British
Activities	Opinion journalist, historian

Martin Allen is a British writer, author of three history books.

Biography

In a book published in 2005, Martin Allen affirms, based on documents from the British national archives, that Himmler would have been assassinated by the Allies1, a thesis which is supported by David Irving. This book by Allen is still qualified as an excellent work in the Journal of Military History of July 2006.

A few months after the publication of the book, and on the initiative of the Telegraph newspaper, the officials of the British national archives had a specialist appraise certain documents on which Allen relied. The expert concludes that several of these documents are forgeries. According to the article published on this subject by the Telegraph in July 2005, there is nothing to suggest that Martin Allen was in bad faith by using these falsified sources.

Another fake is detected among the documents he used as a source for his book (The King Who Betrayed, Ed. Plon, 2000) on the supposed betrayal of the Duke of Windsor.

The British archives refrained from pressing charges due to the state of health of Martin Allen.

Publications

• Himmler’s Secret War: The Covert Peace Negotiations of Heinrich Himmler, Da Capo Press, 2005, (ISBN 978-0786717088)
• The Hitler/Hess Deception : British Intelligence’s Best-Kept Secret of the Second World War, HarperCollins UK, 2004, (ISBN 978-0007141197)
• Hidden Agenda: How the Duke of Windsor Betrayed the Allies, M. Evans and Company, Inc.; 1st Am. ed. edition, 2002, (ISBN 978-0871319937)

Notes and references

• Martin Allen, Himmler’s Secret War, 2005
• · Journal of Military History, vol. 70, n^o 3, juillet 2006, p. 860-861.
• · (en)Ben Fenton, « Files on Himmler ‘murder’ exposed as fake », telegraph.co.uk,‎ 3 juillet 2005 (lire en ligne [archive])
• · (en)David Leppard, « Historian in Himmler dispute was in earlier forgery furore » [archive], sur The Sunday Times, 3 juillet 2005

1. ·  François Kersaudy, « Édouard VIII n’a jamais trahi » [archive], sur Le Figaro, 6 février 2013

• Portail de la littérature britannique

We find that this time, the unknown author of this article is not looking for false arguments, he is content to cite a few facts.

By forgetting of course to give Mr. Allen’s version of these accusations of embezzlement.

Then he concludes with a laconic: “The British archives refrained from filing a complaint because of the state of health of Martin Allen”
Supposed, in reality, to endorse in a roundabout way the thesis of falsification, by this absence of commentary or analysis;
Indeed, knowing the state of health of Mr. Allen, which is not worrying, is it not more logical that the outcome of a trial being uncertain, it was more prudent to let a demeaning doubt? What is called the rumor…

Another argument in this direction: this accusation was followed with enthusiasm by all the historical-commercial French that we know very well today for their participation in the thesis of the “incomprehensible Blitzkrieg” or that of a war waged by the powers of the Good to those of Evil, and which you will easily find on the Internet because they are well known for having sung the praises of the splendid British democracy, the royal family and Churchill.
Praises of course greeted by numerous literary prizes, honorary titles and prebends, and even in the case of Mr. Kersaudy by his elevation to the rank of dignitary of the Order of the British Empire …

In reality, how could one imagine that Mr. Martin Allen, recognized worldwide by his peers for his courage and his intellectual honesty, could have risked his reputation and his career by contravening in such a stupid way the rules of his profession?

How can we imagine that he could have played the forger by obtaining paper and vintage typewriters, to further add to the evidence he brought?

It’s ridiculous !

On the other hand, how not to recognize the high expertise of the British Secret Services, specialists in fakes and uses?!

They are perfectly equipped and motivated to produce such documents and slip them into the archives that Mr. Allen consulted!

Services which I defy to raise my accusation, by proving the contrary, for that would require them to demonstrate that His Majesty’s Government would have had no interest in destroying the reputation of a respected historian. So that there was never French military treason, and that Big Black Capital, as well as the British European Party, had nothing to do with this war!

And we understand better why I took the precaution of never, or almost never, consulting the archives, and of basing myself only on writings known to all. Works written by the best academics going completely in the direction of Mr. Allen and that the secret services of his Majesty will have great difficulty in all discrediting.

If they ever have the honesty to open them…

German officers also testified

Another victim of this deliberate desire to cover up betrayal:

Julius Mader, German historian – whom we remember having already met in the 4th volume – author of a book on the generals who revealed the underside of the cards on the Nazi side, in particular with the written testimony of General Piekenbrock who attested that he did not there was no German 5th Column able to organize all the betrayals observed on the ground during the Battle of France such as: Displacement of civilian populations, bridges not jumped, orders for withdrawals in series, assassinations of officers and other “tanks ghosts”…
Here is what he reports of the pressures he had to undergo for having published this document denouncing, among other things, the relations between the Reich and the cartels of Big Black Capital, AGFA, IG Farben, and other mass murderers who, having established their factories in the heart of the concentration camps, used the deportees to further increase their pharaminous profits without worrying about the thousands of victims they caused: “The content of this book being explosive, the command of the secret services of the federal republic and that of the Bundeswehr were to use all the means at their disposal to prevent, or at least thwart, its publication. These networks, which continue the criminal tradition of Hitler’s generals, fear the truth as the devil fears holy water. Thus, for example, the Wehrkunde – a newspaper dealing with military problems, the official organ of the militarist society for the information of the Armies, gave this solemn warning in its columns as early as December 1966: “Very recently, Mader addressed to former officers of the Abwehr letters “from a good German” asking them to send him information, activity reports etc., intended for a documentation that he would be in the process of constituting . In fact, it is a sneak attack directed against the former Abwehr and the Federal German Information Service (one of the first secret service offices in West Germany whose power stands immediately behind that of the Chancellery itself) as well as against the book, recently published by Gert Buchheit, entitled: The German Secret Service – History of Military Defence…

Therefore, it is expressly recommended not to provide any information or documentation to addresses located in the Soviet zone (i.e. in the German Democratic Republic).

Four months later, publications issued under the aegis of the Federal Service for the Protection of the Constitution repeated this kind of warning with even more precision. It was written there:

“If you receive a letter from a certain Julius Mader, do not answer and forward it to the competent Security Services… The current work which Mader is currently working on is to be published under the following title: Hitler’s Spy Generals Depose…
From these reactions, which also underline the necessity and topicality of my work, we can objectively deduce several points:
– First, Hitler’s spy generals benefit from complicities even within West German political circles, but these accomplices are no longer unknown to us.
– Secondly, each of the former officers of the Secret Service of Hitler’s Army had the opportunity to demonstrate their break with their past and to contribute to History by telling the only Truth.
– Third, it has become clear that capitalist circles and high officials of the federal administration have an interest in keeping the past activity of a large number of Nazi war criminals in the shadows by thwarting any investigation of them. »

So of course, I can already hear the “accredited experts” affirming that this work by Mr. Mader was undoubtedly a propaganda tool for the benefit of East Germany, and that it must be placed in the context of the Cold War, before judging its validity.

If so, please answer this…

The German “submarine” is still not sunk

Indeed, concerning the privileged relations between the Nazi Reich and the “democracies” in the Anglo-Saxon style, it is not in vain to come back to yet another “forgotten detail”: The importance that the intelligence services of the Wehrmacht (Abwehr) during the Hitler period, then after the war.

Importance largely minimized since, by highlighting the action of some Democratic officers who fought with all their might against Nazism, such as Admiral Canaris, Oster, or Lahoussen, but about whom we must not forget that they were, for the only part that could be demonstrated, responsible in 12 European countries, without counting the USSR, for the execution or the deportation of 1 million 277 754 resistance fighters and anti-fascist sympathizers.
It was these Abwehr leaders, renamed anti-Communists for the purposes of the fairy tale, who were carefully protected after the war by the American government, then re-infiltrated to the highest level of responsibility in Germany from the West, such:

Joseph Müller, who became one of the Bavarian leaders of the Christian Democratic Party, or Hermann Götz, member of the executive committee of the CDU branch in Hesse, chairman of the committee for refugees, and of the working committee on “internal and external security questions” , director of the federal work community for assistance to soldiers, member of the Ackermanngemeinde within the Society of Sudeten compatriots, Member of Parliament in Bonn from 1949 and, from 1968, Chairman of the Work Commission of social policy of the CDU / CSU group in the Bundestag.
Among the early members of the FDP we also find Doctor Victor Hoven who was once captain and battalion commander in the Brandenburg division of the Abwehr, the section in charge of the liquidation of opponents, who had formed a “fifth column fascist in Belgium.

In 1954, this senior Nazi official already sat in the F.D.P. of the Land of Nordrhein-Westfalen, and in 1957 entered the Bundestag.
Another notorious example: The captain of the Abwehr 2, Theodor Oberländer, a former Nazi Gauleiter who first reappeared on the political scene as a member of the F.D.P. to then become president of the Federal Association of Refugees and Despoiled (BHE) and finally land, in 1956, in the CDU of Adenauer.
Same presence at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs with Vice-Admiral Léopold Bürkner, former head of the foreign service under Canaris, who in 1949 became adviser to the ministers of foreign affairs, or even Otto Wagner, alias Doctor Delius, colonel at the Abwehr and head of the K.O. of Bulgaria who, with his friend Commander Alexander Cellarius, former head of the K.O. of Finland Estonia, will become Permanent Advisors to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for South-Eastern and North-Eastern European issues.

And all of this is understandable, if we remember that these ties were not new, since these men of the Abwehr found unconditional support from the highest German representatives of international high finance, such as Hermann Abs , who became chairman and managing director of Deutsche Bank after the war and adviser to successive chancellors of the West German republic, but who occupied in 1942 as chairman of the board of directors of the state bank and representative of the IG Farben, around 40 management positions in industrial companies both in Germany and abroad. That in this capacity, and in full collaboration with the Herman Goering Werke, he exercised a direct influence on La Minière du Sud-Est (under Goering’s control) and Continental Oil (under the control of J.D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil by the Ohio Oil Company) in the Netherlands, in Luxembourg, in Austria, in Czechoslovakia, in Poland, in the Balkan states and within the “Russia” committee as far as the occupied territories of the Caucasus, putting the commercial and industrial information obtained by its spy services in the service of the Abwehr.

We can therefore affirm, without fear of being contradicted, that these trusts under American control, and the German secret services worked throughout the war, hand in hand, in order to organize the looting of Europe.

Here is what Dr. Ilgner, former director of the “NW 7 office” (subversion department) of IG Farben, and vice-president of the Central European Economic Committee, confessed to his contacts with the Canaris before the commission of inquiry of the American military tribunal in Nuremberg: “The Abwehr, like the service of the war economy, wanted to obtain economic information on foreign countries and was very interested in research from the department of political economy… It is true that the information of IG Farben was so complete that there was not the slightest change to be made in its methods of investigation. The political economy department of the IG was then the best and most comprehensive in Germany…”

And what better source of intelligence to identify all the goods still lootable in Europe, then to organize the control of the greatest industrial power of the continent?

Thus we understand better why in 2019, Germany suddenly seemed to discover that more than half of the politicians and senior civil servants in office in the post-war years were former active Nazis…” [1]

So while waiting for our experts to oppose other archives and testimonies to those put forward by Mr. Mader, let our witness conclude: “But the fact that in the end my book saw the light of day clearly shows that the arm of German imperialism is no longer long enough to mutilate historical truth, to prevent the revelation of facts which contribute to its knowledge.
It is in this spirit of respect for historical truth that I thank the personalities and the management of the services of the German Democratic Republic and of other countries who have provided me with effective assistance by communicating their archives to me.
I would particularly like to thank the working “team” of former intelligence officers who organized numerous contacts for me in the two Germanys and contributed, through the mass of their information, to the raw material of this work. »
End of quote (Mader German generals depose – Introduction)

Everyone knows that the list of former Nazis totally subservient to the “Liberators” and their international interests who have reached the highest positions of responsibility in the post-war German state is impressive. The only crime of M. Julius Mader was therefore to quote them, when they should have been “forgotten”.

Just as it was necessary to remove from the fairy tale the “Octagon” system set up by Allen Dulles, still at the head of the American Secret Service, using the gold stolen from the Peoples of Europe by the SS.

A network which, drawing on this “war chest” sheltered in Swiss coffers, mounted a new arms traffic to rearm Germany and gave all the financial means to the CDU to elect its candidate Konrad Adenauer in the Chancellery to lead the Cold War.

And we understand better why Adenauer replaced in command positions men such as Reinhard Gehlen, personal liaison officer in May 1940 between Field Marshal von Brauchitsch and Guderian’s army group, so a man who could only be informed of the French betrayal, to make him the head of the West German secret service and thus put hundreds of other senior Nazi officials at the service of the CIA.

Just back from the elevator…

Fortunately these historians defied the unwritten laws and, thanks to their precise and stubborn work, we were able to draw all the threads linking together the various pillars of the lie of States.

This gives us the right, today, to qualify the authors whom I have denounced in this book as “experts” in disinformation, as “deniers”.

Just like those who try to rehabilitate Hitler, or to deny Nazi crimes, their writings are, as we have seen, tainted by the same bad faith, and proceed from the same intellectual perversity.

They therefore serve a determined cause, and must be judged for what they are: counterfeiters. Then fought in public places, in order to:

“our Fatherland really become a great power again, the high moral and intellectual force necessary for humanity, which it was and must remain”. 

General Gamelin – Serve Volume 1 page XV

[1] Note to the attention of curious readers, the publication in 2005 of a work of more than 700 pages, written by Mr. Ernst Klee entitled: Das Personen lexikon zum drittent Reich. Wer war was vor und nach 1945? proposing the list of thousands of Nazis who obtained post-war high positions in multinationals, or within the German government.

[2] This shell company was created in Switzerland by the arms dealer Rudolf de Ruscheweyh who had made himself known as an intermediary between the Swiss machine tool factory Oerlikon-Bührle, entirely bought between 1927 and 1929 by Herr Emil Jorg Bührle one of the officers already involved in the secret rearmament of Germany in Russia and who, since then, mainly produced anti-aircraft guns sold to both the Allies and the Axis forces. It was under this cover that Ruscheweyh was able to organize the flight of Nazi capital to tax havens and the offshore accounts of Big Black Capital.

After the war, this economically “out of control” system of “democracies” was therefore able to freely reestablish links with “American friends” through the intermediary of Allen Dulles, head of the OSS in Switzerland (ancestor of the CIA), who immediately recruited the former Nazis he needed, in particular the SS who had the upper hand on this treasure and the members of the Secret Services who had been in charge of locating the goods to be looted.

The company Octogon Trust, officially specialized in wealth management and import-export, was then responsible for organizing the flight of war criminals, especially to South America, where they will once again serve Big Black Capital, fomenting on demand the “spontaneous revolutions” or “counter-revolutions” necessary for the overthrow of governments that are too republican…. This system will be described in all its details in the volumes to be published. And for the impatient in: The Testament of Sidney Warburg.

[1] Signalons à l’attention des lecteurs curieux, la parution en 2005 d’un ouvrage de plus de 700 pages, rédigé par M. Ernst Klee intitulé : Das Personen lexikon zum drittent Reich. Wer war was vor und nach 1945 ? proposant la liste des milliers de nazis ayant obtenu après-guerre de hautes fonctions dans des multinationales, ou au sein du gouvernement allemand.

[1] [1] Cette société écran fut crée en Suisse par le marchand d’armes Rudolf de Ruscheweyh qui s’était fait connaître en tant qu’intermédiaire obligé entre l’usine suisse de machines-outils Oerlikon-Bührle, entièrement rachetée entre 1927 et 1929 par Herr Emil Jorg Bührle un des officiers déjà impliqué dans le réarmement secret de l’Allemagne en Russie et qui, depuis, produisait essentiellement des canons antiaériens vendus aussi bien aux alliés qu’aux forces de l’Axe. C’est sous cette couverture que Ruscheweyh put organiser la fuite des capitaux nazis vers les paradis fiscaux et les comptes ofshore du Grand capital noir.

Après la guerre, ce système économiquement « hors contrôle » des « démocraties » put donc librement rétablir les liens avec les « amis américains » par l’intermédiaire d’Allen Dulles, patron de l’OSS en Suisse (ancêtre de la CIA), qui recruta immédiatement les anciens nazis dont il avait besoin, en particuliers les SS ayant eu la haute main sur ce trésor et les membres des Services Secrets qui avaient été en charge de localiser les biens à piller.

La société Octogon Trust, officiellement spécialisée dans la gérance de fortune et l’import-export, fut alors chargée d’organiser la fuite des criminels de guerre, spécialement en Amérique du sud, où ils serviront à nouveau le Grand Capital noir, en fomentant à la demande les « révolutions spontanées » ou « contre-révolutions » nécessaires au renversement des gouvernements trop républicains…. Ce système sera décrit dans tous ses détails dans les tomes à paraître. Et pour les impatients dans : Le Testament de Sidney Warburg

1 – LIGHTS ON SECRET SERVICES

One of the first explanations presented by world historiography to accredit the “surprise effect” of the Blitzkrieg was, as we have seen, the alleged inefficiency of the French secret services which would have left the high command in the dark, both of the capabilities of the German army than the successive plans adopted by Hitler.

A preposterous thesis that should now be analyzed carefully, in order to leave no doubt on this decisive point.

Knowing that the most well-known and effective German informants were very high-ranking officers, belonging either to the OKH (Army Headquarters) or to the OKW (Army Headquarters), who were going to betray the Nazi Reich out of patriotic conviction.

It is therefore appropriate to cite the most striking example of their effectiveness:

The Viking network (Lucy for the Anglo-Saxons) led by a certain …

Rudolf Roessler

During the First World War, this German officer became friends with other Democratic officers.

A few years later, in 1933, disgusted by Hitler’s rise to power and on the advice of his friend Xavier Schnieper – son of a Lucerne State Councilor and Swiss SR officers – he emigrated to found Lucerne a small publishing house, the Vita Nova Verlag, which will serve him to publish perfectly documented articles analyzing from 1933 the policy of the Reich and denouncing Hitler’s projects. All information obtained from his friends, who remained in the army and reached important positions of responsibility.
The coded letters that he receives as well as the frequent visits of his contacts allow him to obtain political and economic information that he publishes in his newspaper under the pseudonym of “Hermes”.

A few months before the declaration of war in September 1939, Roessler, contacted by Colonel Masson, head of the Swiss intelligence services, agreed to stop publishing this information in his newspaper, to communicate it directly to the Swiss services.

At this time the network is structured around a few men:

1° Xavier Schnieper, who recommended Roessler to Colonel Masson, and will become his dealing officer.
2° Colonel Masson, head of the Swiss SRs, himself pro-allied, unlike the head of the army, general Henri Guisan, pro-German. This opposition will force Masson to take risks.

3° Captain Hausamann who, before the war, set up a press service disguising an intelligence network bearing the code name “Bureau HA”.

Hausamann sent Masson daily, through Captain Max Weibel, head of section 9 of the Swiss SRs, the information he obtained daily from Roessler.

He provided the same information to Colonel Barbey, General Guisan’s chief of staff, as well as to the French, British, Belgian, Dutch and Norwegian SRs through Captain Sedlacek (code name: Uncle Tom), a former Czech SR, emigrated to London.
The information therefore reaches ALL the Allies, as well as all threatened neutral countries, as we will see again throughout this investigation.

The coded letters easily passed censorship and, in an emergency, telephone conversations made it possible to transmit Hitler’s latest decisions.

The “Viking Network” which, for the Allies will become the “Lucy Network”, will thus operate throughout the duration of the conflict.

The only condition imposed by Roessler: Never reveal the names of his comrades.

Moreover, even today, no one can claim to know with certainty the names of these German heroes. According to the CIA, in addition to Gersdorf and Thiele, “there is a connection to Generals Wirth, Mueller, Lemmer, Gisevius, Horkheimer, probably Thormann, and possibly Joachim Oster.”

In reality, no one, apart from Roessler, has ever known who precisely these men were sufficiently high up (among “the five”) to be able to know the most intimate decisions of the Führer, almost in real time.

Gaston Pourchot, key witness

The historian and journalist Pierre Accoce crowned by numerous prizes for his works, and at that time investigative journalist at the Express, unveiled the first in 1965 in his bestseller translated into several languages: The War has been won in Switzerland, the existence of what was the most mysterious network of the Second World War.
As he personally confirmed to me in 2012 during a long filmed interview, in 1963 he met the survivors of the Viking network and interviewed, during his investigation of more than a year, many members of the Swiss secret services who worked with Roessler, who died in 1958.

Among them, Schnieper, of course, and the widow of Rudolf Roessler, but especially Colonel Masson, with whom he will have several interviews first in Lausanne, then at his home in Vevey.

He will testify to his relations with Major Gaston Pourchot, Deputy Military Attaché at the French Embassy.

Testimony which can be summed up in a few lines: “The base of the French intelligence services in Switzerland was located on the first floor of the French consulate, rue Sulgenheim in Bern. Commander Pourchot was assisted by Commander Trichet, Captain Mathiot, Lieutenants Duroux, Talichet, Nappey.

This “Pourchot network” had branches in Basel, Zurich, Lausanne, Geneva. About fifty agents in 1940, then 250 specialists from 1942, when the network became the annex of the clandestine national network “Kleber”.

Concerning the engagement of this capital witness that was Commander Pourchot, let us specify that he organized the escape of General Henri Giraud in December 1940, with Colonel Masson and the Alsatian resistance networks, that in 1944 he will be decorated by the General Bethouard for his clandestine action, then received the Legion of Merit in 1946, and some high US decorations with congratulations from President Truman for having transmitted vital information to the Allies until 1945. (He had been contacted in 1942 by Allen Dulles, OSS agent commanded by US General Donovan, and ancestor of the future CIA)

Pourchot and Roessler met regularly: “The ties between Masson and Pourchot dated back to September 1, 1939. They saw each other often, notably at the Odéon café, near Bern City Hall. »

It was to Pourchot that Colonel Masson entrusted the famous message announcing the German attack ten days in advance.

Colonel Masson also confirmed to Mr. Accoce that Pourchot had, upon receipt, himself taken this telegram to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and to the General Headquarters of the army at Vincennes. That the Belgian General Maurice Delvoie, Belgian military attaché in Paris had, at the same time, alerted the French military authorities of this imminent risk.

The facts and the men have therefore been known to everyone since 1940 and proof of the existence of the message informing of the imminent German attack abounds in the books published by intelligence officers, or in specialized journals, such as the Bulletin de la Jura Society of Officers (Swiss), 34th section National Federation of S/Officers. Title of the article: “The German attack in May 1940”. From the pen of Captain Dunand, 2nd Bureau, deputy and contact of the French military attaché in Switzerland: “As of April 30, we received from Bern from a perfectly authorized and first-hand source (Roessler) the following information: L Germany will attack between 8 and 10 May. Stop. Main axis effort, Sedan. Stop. Planned occupation of Holland and Belgium, northern France in 10 days. Stop. Total occupation of France in one month. Stop. End “

Other testimonies confirm: “Alerts emanating from Berlin for Belgium and Holland, from Bern, on behalf of Belgium and France. Source in Switzerland? The service of Roger Masson, Swiss SR, via Commander Gaston Pourchot, French military attaché. »
End of quote (Captain Dimitry Queloz The Swiss Intelligence Service)

Apparently, in view of all these corroborating testimonies, Roessler and his Viking network, as well as the information he passed on, should figure prominently in the story of this battle.
But, surprisingly, it is not.

Better ! Some historiographers and journalists from all walks of life and from all countries still try to ignore, or even dispute, the existence of these warnings…

Historians just as “deaf” as the generals of the fairy tale

In order to leave no doubt about this desire for disinformation, I take the liberty of quoting here Mr. Jean Vanwelkenhuyzen[1], a well-known Belgian expert who, on page 55 of his 1940 book Spotlight on a disaster published in 1996, more than 30 years after that of Pierre Accoce, but still abundantly quoted by all negationist authors, writes: “After the events, as if to restore the image of intelligence, there was much talk of a mysterious warning, issued on 30 April or May 1, by the French military attaché in Bern and prophesying, with variants according to the versions, the offensive for May 8 or 10, with Sedan as the point of application of the main effort. Holland, Belgium and the French North being occupied in 10 days, France in a month. The proof of this message has never been provided and it is all the more regrettable that it would offer a rare example of premonitions since, on April 30 or May 1, Hitler did not know himself that he would open fire on May 10. His decision only fell the day before. »

By inventing from scratch this decisive message from Roessler, the leaders of the French Intelligence Services would therefore have wanted to clear themselves of customs by making the politicians take the blame.

And of course, if we consider the brilliant university titles Mr. Vanwelkenhuyzen: Doctor of political and diplomatic sciences, graduate in economics and financial sciences, and noting that he is in this capacity: director of the Center for Research and histories of the Second World War, secretary general of the International Committee for the History of the Second World War and Vice-president of the Belgian National Committee for Historical Sciences, one cannot but be very impressed by such an affirmation.

---

[1] The author in question, to support his demonstration, quotes: General Rivet: Were we informed in May 1941: In National Defense Review July 1950 Page 36. But also: Gauché page 211, Reynaud page 422, Henri Navarre , the intelligence service page 110.     

---

Except that … Colonel Gauché, whom he quotes, is formal in his testimony (published in 1953): “The SR, for its part, brings the precious indications received from its antennas which, for a long time, have been alerted. We reproduce them here, without disclosing the source, but respecting their laconic form; they will only be more striking:

From the beginning of April: “The German SR expects the Belgian border to be closed at the end of April. »

April 11: “Imminent operations in the west, watch out for military movements in the next few days. »

20 April: “German SR personnel abandon their parking places in Belgium”.

May 1: “The German army will attack between May 8 and May 10 along the entire front, including the Maginot Line. The region of Sedan, Belgium, Holland and the French north will be occupied in ten days, France in a month. »

May 2: “Imminent closure of Belgian and Dutch borders”

Night of May 5 to 6: “Next general offensive which will encompass the Netherlands. »

May 6: “The antenna of the German SR of Stuttgart stationed in Luxembourg folds up. Attack ready. The French army, it is said in the circles of the German command, will be unable to stop the armored formations in the open countryside.

May 8 (by way of Italy): “Attack for this very day. »

May 9: “Attack on the 10th, at daybreak. »

This information was preceded by the event. He did not reach the SR until the German attack had just begun. »
End of quote (Left, The second Bureau at work page 211)

In addition to this perfectly explicit testimony, many others, including that of General Navarre at the time, a member of the SRs and head of the Germany department, or of Paul Reynaud, who combined the functions of Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs, confirm that their services had received this message on May 1st.
General Louis Rivet, in his book Carnets d’un chef des Services Secrets 1936-1944, also reports that the 2nd Bureau had been warned by the Swiss SRs of an imminent attack in the Sedan sector, while other witnesses attest that Major Pourchot delivered this information personally to the GHQ of Vincennes, therefore to Generalissimo Gamelin, but also to the N°2 of the Army, General Georges.

So who should you believe? These senior French and Swiss military and political leaders, or a brilliant representative of official history who believes that only the hero of his own book, Colonel Oster of the Abwehr, deserves the attention of the Center for Research and Historical studies of the Second World War, the International Committee for the History of the Second World War, and the Belgian National Committee for Historical Sciences?

To decide between them, let us consider the bases of Mr. Vanwelkenhuyzen’s argument by leaning, as he did, on the German documents according to which, on May 1, Hitler had fixed the date of the offensive at the 5th, then the reported several times:

On May 8, we learn from Jodl: “Alarming news from Holland. Cancellation of permissions, evacuations, roadblocks, other mobilization measures… Führer does not want to wait any longer. Göring asks for at least 10. Führer very agitated, then agrees to postpone until the 10th, which is contrary to his intuition he says. But not one more day”
(quoted by Shirer The Fall of the Third Republic)

Apparently, Hitler was indeed hesitant.
Mr Vanwelkenhuyzen’s arguments therefore seem admissible.

And in any case if we do not think further because, on the one hand, the approximate date was fixed by Hitler as of April 27 and not May 1, as evidenced on this date in his diary by General Jodl, chief of Hitler’s personal staff: “the Führer intends to launch the yellow plan between the first and the 7th of May. »

This allows us to understand how Roessler’s friends have already been able to estimate the probable date as early as April 31.
On the other hand, it had to be decided on the basis of two elements:

1st element: The weather, very unfavorable at the beginning of May.

However, to make the most of Hitler’s best weapon, aviation, it needed good weather over a long period. A thinning, even of a day or two, was not enough.

This is why on the evening of the 9th, when the head of the Luftwaffe weather service finally announces to his Führer that the sky will be cloudless the next day, this good news pushes the latter to offer him a superb gold watch.

But does this gesture mean that, since April 30, this weather specialist had been unable, at least approximately, to predict the period of bad weather which was to extend from May 1 to 9?

A storm in May, especially if it is powerful enough to block aviation, is easily identifiable. We are not talking here of a simple period of bad weather in winter, but of an important and exceptional phenomenon, all the characteristics of which were perfectly known to Marshal Hermann Goering, Commander-in-Chief of the Luftwaffe, who, having the high hand on the meteorological services, had assigned naval launches and submarines, stationed in the Arctic regions to weather surveillance.
However, at the beginning of May, all the specialists were unanimous: There would be a period of exceptional good weather between May 10 and 17: “The reports then specify that the winds will be “weak or moderate with a predominance of currents coming from the north. Their average speed will reach six meters per second. The sky should be partly cloudy. In the valleys morning fog is to be expected, but no precipitation will occur. The average temperature will remain around 14 degrees. In the Ardennes light night frosts are possible, but the days will be bright, with excellent visibility. »

End of quote (Berben and Iselin The Panzers cross the Meuse page 36)

Thus, that this parameter actually played an important role is not debatable. On the other hand, that he was the only one to have delayed the attack is to be ruled out since the end could be foreseen well before the evening of the 9th.

2nd element: The ultimatum that Hitler had planned to send to neutral countries in order to politically justify his attack.

Here are the terms of this document drawn up from May 3: “The German government has known for a long time that the real aim of England and France is the attack in the west against Germany, an attack carefully prepared and the day before it comes true. And which consists of pushing a point towards the territories of the Ruhr, passing through the territories of Belgium and Holland. (-) The government of Germany does not intend, in this struggle for existence imposed on the German people by England and France, to wait until the war is carried on German territory. He has just given the German troops the order to ensure the neutrality of these countries by all the means of military force at Germany’s disposal. »

On this subject, the archives tell us that the Wilhelmstrasse (German Foreign Ministry) will come up against an unforeseen problem because, for his part, the King of the Belgians, perfectly informed by his ambassador in Berlin, Mr. Davignon, will employ all the means from May 8 to prevent the ultimatum from reaching him, notably closing his border to emissaries.

Episode, again, “forgotten” by Mr Vanwelkenhuyzen in his reasoning.

So my questions are:

1° Given these difficulties, was it difficult to foresee that the attack would be delayed?

2° Was Hitler expecting anything other than perfect weather or the delivery of his ultimatum? Like, for example, that the French high command was able to use the Pentecost weekend as a pretext to strip its northern front as appropriate?
In this order of idea, is it possible to imagine that the German democratic generals of the Viking network, by virtue of their position within the OKW, the OKH and the Abwehr, were informed that the permissions had been restored on the French side, and that the emissaries were having difficulty accomplishing their mission?

That they were able to integrate these different elements into their forecasts and therefore had a perfectly clear view of the situation as it stood on April 30?
This allowed them to estimate, given the diplomatic difficulties, the weather, and the Pentecost weekend, that the final date of the attack could not be before May 8 and more certainly the 10, when the weather would be favourable, and where 20% of the French army would actually be far from the front!
Knowing that Roessler’s correspondents were obviously better informed than Oster, – which all historians unanimously confirm – and therefore able to know, well before anyone else, the exact difficulties encountered at all levels, is it not it not logical to estimate that they had no difficulty in crossing all these parameters?
Thesis which would allow us to remove from the equation the possibility that the German and allied SRs would have had, as a common trait, to preferably employ deaf-mute, blind, and slightly deficient specialists in addition…

As for the ultimate reason why Hitler was so impatient, it is given to us on May 7 by the Diary of General Halder:

“The Führer is very excited. He has just been informed of a conversation between the Belgian ambassador to the Vatican and the Belgian foreign minister in Brussels, leading to the conclusion of treason from a German source. »

And all of this confirms that “everyone knew everything, about everyone” and that what the official fairy tale calls a “surprise” is just a big joke.

What we will still have a thousand times the opportunity to verify…

The state thesis fills the dustbins of history

With regard to the value and the exceptional quality of the information communicated to the Swiss SRs, let us recall that in the period going from 1938 to 1941, Roessler and his friends will send twelve thousand single-spaced typed pages, the equivalent of forty normal books!

That is infinitely more than the information provided by Colonel Oster, the main character in Mr Vanwelkenhuyzen’s book.

And we understand that this is irritating for this expert!

Especially since the results obtained by Roessler were decisive on the ground, if not during the campaign in France or Poland for the reasons we have understood, but at least subsequently, on the Eastern Front, as well as General Guderian testifies:
“During the fighting in the kyiv pocket, the commanding general of the Soviet 5th Army was our prisoner on September 26. I had an interesting interview with him, during which I asked him a few questions:
– When did you learn that my tanks were deploying behind your back?
– Answer: “Around September 8”

General Heinz Guderian Erinnerungen eines Soldaten 1951

As for the other “liars” castigated by Mr Vanwelkenhuyzen, they testify in the same way to the effectiveness of the “Viking-Lucy” network: “Lucy held in her hands the threads that went back to the three major commands of the German army… The he effect of his communications on the strategy of the Red Army and on the defeat of the Wehrmacht was considerable. »
Alexander Foote ex-Soviet secret agent – ​​Handbook for Spies 1947

“The Soviets then exploited a fantastic source, located in Switzerland, a man named Rudolph Roessler who had the code name Lucy. By means which have not yet been clarified today, Roessler in Switzerland managed to obtain information from the German high command in Berlin at a fairly uninterrupted rate and often less than twenty-four hours after they had been arrested. day-to-day decisions about the Eastern Front. »
Allen Dulles, former director of the Central Intelligence Agency – The technique of intelligence Paris 1964

Finally, since it seems that Mr. Vanwelkenhuyzen only takes into account, like so many of his colleagues, what can support his own contribution to the Blitzkrieg thesis, I propose to settle the question by recalling that in 1941, during of the Riom trial, President Caous and Attorney General Cassagneau – after having heard the testimonies of the highest officials of the French SRs – were able to draw the following conclusions:

“The mobilization of the German army was followed unit by unit, without any gaps or errors.
– The same was true of the concentration of German units facing Poland, on the one hand, and France, Denmark, Belgium and Holland, on the other.
– The distribution of forces has always been perfectly indicated to the French High Command, during the Polish campaign, during the interval between the Polish and French campaigns.
– The transfer to the West of the large units having taken part in the Polish campaign was entirely monitored by the French S.R., without ever losing sight of a large German unit for more than 24 hours.
– The German position on the eve of May 10, 1940 was known in the smallest details, as well as the possibilities of maneuver that it carried in germ.
– The date and place of the attack of May 10, 1940 were communicated to the French Command with some reservations from the end of March 1940, and, with certainty, from April 1940. (Emphasis mine)
– The constitution of the German land and air forces has been kept up to date without gaps and that as well for their composition as for their equipment and their weapons, and, however paradoxical it may seem, the French S.R. of the German army a rather overestimated description: this is how the number of tanks of the German armored divisions was overestimated by 10 to 15%, due to the fact that the factory outputs were behind the forecasts.
– During the campaign in France most of the German movements were identified from start to finish. In particular each armored division was followed without any error thanks to the interception and the exploitation of all the command messages of the large German units. Thus could be announced and described: the attack on the Meuse, the march towards the Channel, the regroupings for the attacks on the Somme, in Champagne, etc., etc.

The Court even paid tribute to the efficiency and foresight of the secret services…

As for what concerns the indubitable material proof, therefore the original message, we know that the archives of the Quai d’Orsay were burned on May 16, 1940 in the morning. A huge fire in the courtyard of the ministry in which the telegrams, including those emanating from Bern, went up in smoke. A few years later, numerous documents seized by the Wehrmacht from an abandoned train in Charité-sur-Loire were also burned during the fall of Berlin. These famous telegrams and their copies have therefore been destroyed.

But does this authorize the most renowned historians to affirm that they never existed?

Finally, and since the aim here is to put an end to this false controversy, can Mr Vanwelkenhuyzen explain to us why he did not mention in his work, published in 1982, the book by Mrs Amort and Jedlicka: On called it A 54, published by Robert Laffont in 1966 which revealed the existence of another agent, Paul Thümmel, who gave exactly the same information as Roessler and within the same time frame?

Ditto for that of Mrs Paul Berben and Bernard Iselin, two excellent revisionist authors who published in 1969, in their perfectly documented work Les Panzer passers la Meuse, the list of officers having confirmed that this message had reached other Allied staffs . (text already quoted above on April 30)

Same question for the book of General Paul Paillole, at that time responsible for the Germany service.

Testimony published in 1975, therefore seven years before the work of this “expert”: “The imminence of a German offensive appeared to the English. On May 2, a meeting of the heads of departments of the second and fifth French and British Bureaus takes place at the British Embassy. Our information is compared with that of our allies. The connections are further strengthened. The security of British troops operating in France will be provided by our B.C.R.s, to whom British security officers will be added.

Bertrand’s services (thanks to the Enigma machine) reveal the preparation of air attacks on our airfields every day. On May 6, the antenna of the German S. R. of Stuttgart installed in Luxembourg folds. »

End of quote (Paillole Special Services page 188)

“May 2” … Two days after the messages from Roessler from Bern, Commander Munier from Budapest, and Paul Thümmel from Prague. And the confirmation that these messages were also transmitted to the British SRs. That they were studied jointly by the two services.

In addition, we know that the British SRs will be informed by their agent Sator of the date of the attack on May 7.
And we suspect that these must have had other sources, still unknown to historians.

In conclusion, all this confirms that a certain form of Holocaust denial, directed very precisely in order to evade the fact that the Allies knew not only the day and the date of the attack, but also since March 10, 1940 the Manstein plan in all its details, seems always practiced by the highest European and even world university authorities, since the contributions of Roessler, Thümmel, Munier and Sator are systematically evaded or denied by the historiographers, especially the most prestigious.

We are therefore faced with a major attempt at disinformation.

2 – DISORDING VOICES IN THE CHORUS OF THE APOSTLES

As early as May 1940, many members of the French Intelligence Services had been unable to ignore the ongoing betrayal.

They were the ones who founded, upon defeat, the first networks of resistance in occupied France and in the free zone and, even if they never openly denounced it, their writings will often go against the State thesis. .

And we are here in a real dissidence within the army, because the officers loyal to Pétain will return their jacket by joining these networks, only after the German armies are blocked in front of Moscow, then Stalingrad in autumn 1942, and for the slowest after the American landing in North Africa on November 8, 1942. So following the occupation of the free zone and once Germany’s defeat was certain.
This very particular caste of the military corporation, republican and resistant at heart, therefore suffered, not only from what they knew to be a betrayal, but also from the pack effect which made these intelligence specialists post-war capable and effective, the laughing stock of the “experts” and the shame of the Army.

Which brings us to this rebellion of the SRs, much more difficult to manage than when it was a question of silencing Republican officers without exact knowledge of the underside of treason, or a generalissimo at the end of his tether, worn out by polemics.

Because this is where a simple journalist comes into the picture, without much power, but curious about everything…

We see the reappearance of the Roessler constant

Indeed, when Mrs Pierre Accoce and Pierre Quet had their work published on the Roessler network in 1965, it had an international impact. Hollywood wants to make a movie out of it, the authors participate in countless reports, or television shows at prime time.
In short, there is a great risk of seeing the curiosity of some historians aroused by this new light. This is all the more so since the Ministry of Defence, always so anxious to make the evidence disappear, should no doubt have been unaware that for their part Messrs. Amort and Jedlicka, at the end of their own investigation, were preparing to release their work On called it A 54, published by Robert Laffont in 1966.
It therefore became imperative to add a few meshes to the net of lies.
This is what Mr. Vanwelkenhuyzen and a few others, whom we know well today because they are just as devoted as he is to maintaining the family secret, did.

Having said this, it is not useless to understand how Mr. Accoce was able to find the traces of Rudolf Roessler, by interesting us in one of the most discreet heroes of this battle in the shadows:

Captain Henri Trautmann.

The SRs, silent servants? Not that much…

Born in 1901 in Woerth in Alsace, appointed in 1948 to the Directorate of Military and Economic Policy Research at the External Documentation and Counterintelligence Service (S.D.E.C).
He directed the Service Action there in the 1960s, under the direction of General Paul Jacquier, companion of the Liberation, one of the first airmen to have joined the Royal Air Force to continue the fight in June 1940, then the Free French Forces.

To understand the exact circumstances of the entry into play of this other piece of the chessboard, let’s go back to 1963, the date of his meeting with Pierre Accoce, when he was close to retirement and kept in service as an agent of liaison of the S.D.E.C between the action service and the services of the Prime Minister at Matignon.

At that time, he still maintained relations of trust and deep friendship with a “former” SR, predecessor of Paul Jacquier at the head of the SDEC, General Paul Joseph Roger Grossin.
This other irreducible Republican born in 1901 in Oran, had been assigned from September 1939 to May 1940, to the staff of the Fifth Army, that of General Bourret, one of the most active Republican officers in the army, that who, tirelessly, will denounce the efforts of La Cagoule to infiltrate her and whom we have already met several times during our investigation.
During this period, his Chief of Staff was General de Lattre de Tassigny and, we remember, the tank commander Colonel de Gaulle!
It is therefore understandable to what extent these “bad associations” would quickly have an unfortunate influence on him since, taken prisoner at the end of June 1940 in the Vosges, he was not long in escaping and joined France where he joined a group of resistance fighters. affiliated with the Combat group. This will cause him to be removed from the executives by the Vichy government in December 1941. It is within this network that he prepares the Allied landings in Algeria.

Then he joined the Free French Forces of General De Gaulle, alongside his friend de Lattre and it was together that they prepared the landing in Provence and went back to Paris.
After a long period at the General Staff of the Armed Forces, he was appointed in 1957 boss of the S.D.E.C. A function that he will hand over to his companion and friend in resistance, General Paul Jacquet, the one who so obligingly guided Mr. Accoce, through Commander Trautmann, behind the dark scenes of the battle…

A difficult and tortuous maneuver that allowed us to understand how President de Gaulle, then in power, but in this time of the Cold War very concerned with restoring France’s independence from the United States and the Soviet Union, had decided to take revenge on his anti-Republican enemies.

Because nothing was done without his agreement…

Thus, the loop is complete, and we understand better by what other magic trick, the little journalist of the Express was able to find the “forgotten” track of Rudolf Roessler’s Viking network.

We remember having heard General Jauneaud denounce the presence at his trial of two English officers, considering that it was: “not fortuitous within the confines of a tribunal assembled to condemn to silence the one who was the youngest general of the French army, the one who knew too much…”

It is therefore probably not useless to investigate further the way in which the English participated in the family secret, because we know well that their silence for eighty years is as eloquent as that of the French governments…

This is why I propose – in case some still doubt the collusion of ALL the governments concerned – a masterpiece of its kind in the great register of lies:

The minutes of the Supreme Inter-Allied Council of April 9, 1940.

Meeting during which the French and British representatives (Chamberlain-Churchill, and Reynaud-Daladier) will feign surprise at the time of the German attack against Denmark and Norway, when we know that the leaders of all these countries were informed of Hitler’s intentions by the German resistance networks, this from the first days of March[1].

To describe this meeting to us, we will follow Mr. François Bédarida, who devoted an excellent work perfectly documented on the question, but whose comments leave pensive…

“The Supreme Council of April 9, 1940 constitutes a special case in the series of Supreme Councils. Decided on the spur of the moment following the invasion, learned in the early morning, of Norway and Denmark, it stands without any preparation, without even a real agenda.

It was in the morning, during the French War Committee meeting urgently at the Elisée at ten o’clock, that the idea of ​​immediate consultation with British civilian and military leaders was adopted.

Chamberlain having also given his agreement, the French leaders (except Gamelin who remains in Paris to prepare a possible entry into Belgium) take the plane for London at noon and the Supreme Council sits in Downing Street in the middle of the afternoon. . »

Today is April 9. The official version, offered here by an expert, claims that General Gamelin, whose role as General-in-Chief of the Allied Armies is BEFORE ANYTHING to participate in his meetings, simply decided to stay in Paris to prepare a “possible entry into Belgium”…

In reality, we know that the Dyle Breda plan has been defined since November, and that if its designer is really busy to the point of not being able to attend this meeting, it is because on this date he is in the process of modifying it totally to add the “trap on the Meuse”.

A trap of which all his allies are warned, at least at the highest level!

Another notable implausibility: If this attack had really been such a “surprise”, wouldn’t his presence have been more than ever essential to agree on the follow-up to be given?

Once again, all this does not add up.

Let’s see what happens next: “Meeting organized in haste (the only possible comparison would be with the Supreme Council of April 27, also set up in disaster) the meeting took place in an atmosphere, if not of panic, at least of haste, of anxiety and uncertainty. (-) At all times telegrams arrive. Some of them are passed on feverishly to heads of government and sitting ministers. Following the debate, one is struck by the look of strategy in the chamber – not to say Café du Commerce – that the discussion takes on several times. The report is therefore undoubtedly the least rich of the series of minutes of the Supreme Council, although it appears instructive by the atmosphere it reveals and several questions of primary importance were raised during the course of trade. »

It is interesting to note that the author, even if he is far from suspecting the slightest desire to fool archivists and historians, notes an unusual atmosphere among the participants. As if these gentlemen were detached from reality. A feeling that one finds when reading the minutes of the same meeting from the pen of four different witnesses: Villelume, Churchill, Reynaud, and Ironside…

Let us now see how Mr. Bédarida will convey the notion of “surprise”: “It is that the Allies, despite several reports from their Intelligence services, were completely taken aback. Nobody seems to have expected the blow, nor to have foreseen it. »
Always this magnificent apparent naivety on the part of the historian: “despite several reports from the SRs”…

Besides, how could these contributions interest the reader, who is only supposed to be interested in the analyzes of the expert!
“As General Spears humorously writes: ‘We could not have been more amazed if, while watching a gangster movie, we had suddenly seen real gangsters come out of the screen. »

I recall that six days earlier, on April 3, Colonel Oster informed that the embarkation of the troops had begun at the port of Stetin, and that the attack would begin on the 9th!
So let’s grant General Spears, head of Her Majesty’s Intelligence Services, that, in the register of tasty digressions, he had nothing to envy to other “witnesses” such as Beaufre, Paillole, Ruby or Minart.

Let us now see if the French will be as gifted: “Paul Baudoin, who recognizes in his memories that “On the night of April 8 to 9, the German reaction burst like a clap of thunder” recounted how, meeting very early in the Office of the President of the Council, Reynaud and his collaborators, after having feverishly awaited the arrival of the atlases, began to search laboriously on the maps for the location of the Norwegian towns mentioned in the telegrams, while sour exchanges opposed Reynaud to Gamelin. »

So here are the highest civil and military officials, who for months have been preparing an attack in Norway to cut off the Reich’s iron supply, suddenly wondering where the country’s main ports are!!!
Apparently Mr. Baudoin – of whom everyone can already guess the decisive role he played in the dismissal of Gamelin and the overthrow of the Third Republic – would also compete for the First Prize, for the best gag to serve in History.

As for the general staff of the British army, it also had a field day:

“In his Memoirs, General Ismay confesses that he, who was at the center of the entire British military information and decision-making apparatus, found himself awakened at dawn on April 9 by a call from the duty officer to the War Cabinet who announced to him, stammering in astonishment, the news of the German attack: “While I was dressing at top speed,” he comments, “I understood for the first time in my life the devastating effect and demoralizing surprise”.

Either a first draft of the version of the sleeping castle of May 10 and the indisputable material proof of the Franco-English understanding as to the family secret since Ismay, at the head of the British SRs, claims to have never heard of the results obtained by the allied SRs for a few years… We understand how “devastated” it could have been. Which brings us back once again to the constant concern, that both French and English would have had, that above all no harm happens to the Germans.
“However, it is precisely on the advantage of surprise that the Germans counted above all by mounting an expedition as unbelievable as Operation Weserübung. A month earlier, to the day, (Admiral) Raeder, in his report to Hitler, had expressed himself in these terms: “The operation in itself is contrary to all the principles of naval warfare. According to these principles, it should only be carried out if we had superiority at sea. But we do not. On the contrary, we must carry out the operation by confronting the British fleet which is very superior to us. »

In fact 99% better! Since we know that on this date, after the great battles at sea of ​​the “phoney war”, the German fleet practically no longer exists.[2]

The last large ships will be sunk or heavily damaged during this battle in Norway!
“Despite this, the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy believes that, provided surprise is complete, our troops can and will be transported successfully to Norway. In many circumstances in military history, it is the very operations that went against all principles that have succeeded, but on one condition: surprise.

And we see here that the inevitable “surprise effect”, a major pillar of the Blitzkrieg theory, also worked at sea!

The allies, however perfectly informed on all the details of this German operation on Norway for weeks, were not there to wait for the Germans. Either a new “incomprehensible blindness” certified by a report of the Supreme Inter-Allied Council!

The report then describes the sequence of events, before concluding:

“Only in Oslo is the unexpected resistance of Oscarborg Fortress somewhat delaying the conquest of the city. »

“Unexpected” resistance from the Norwegians warned in time by Roessler. Which cost the heavy cruiser Blücher to the German fleet, sunk at dawn by the guns of the fort….

New demonstration that when some officers “forget” to be surprised, the bill is no longer the same.

“All in all, on the morning of April 9, the Germans made themselves masters of the principal ports, the airfields and the capital of Norway, as well as the whole of Danish territory: A new and brilliant demonstration of the power of war -flash. »

End of quote (Bédarida The secret strategy of the phoney war pages 363, 364, 365)

Magnificent conclusion of the “expert”: “Blitzkrieg” has also become a maritime concept.

After the revealing one of April 9, let’s come, with the testimony of General Spears, to another Inter-Allied Council during which the absence of French planes on the North-East front was mentioned: “Churchill spoke to me about the change extraordinary attitude of the French at the Supreme Council held in Paris on 22 April. There was no longer talk of outside adventures but, as if the scales had fallen from their eyes, they now revealed a picture, which was all too accurate, (emphasis mine) of Allied weakness compared to their situation during the previous war. “We find ourselves,” said Reynaud, “faced with a growing superiority of the enemy. The current ratio is already three to two and will soon be two to one. As for equipment, Germany had the advantage, both in aviation and artillery and in ammunition supplies. »

However, this “testimony” claiming that President Paul Reynaud had, on the eve of the battle, no idea of ​​the forces present, can only mean two things:

– Either that the real figures would have been hidden from him at the same time by Daladier, Gamelin and all the military and political leaders, including the parliamentarians, since it was debated in the Assembly.

– Either that Reynaud knowingly concealed them, always with the aim of engaging the British to help more actively and quickly in the common defence. Which is the most logical proposition.

However, in both cases, the testimony of General Spears published in 1954 in its English version shows that, like the other British and French generals who participated in the general masquerade, he lied.

Indeed, as we saw in volume N°1, the real German figures were already perfectly known from September 25, 1939 by Lieutenant-Colonel de Villelume, head of President Reynaud’s military cabinet. As for the French figures, we know that they were known to the entire staff.
So how can we imagine that the French and British SRs, who had been working together for months, did not exchange this essential information?

On the other hand, we know from Colonel Masson, head of the Swiss SRs interviewed by Mr. Accoce, that he transmitted all the information obtained from Rudolf Roessler to the Vice-Consul of Great Britain in Geneva, Mr. Victor Farell.
This “error” of the boss of the British intelligence services (MI6) is therefore only one of the countless lies of the state version.

Another demonstration of the virtuosity of the head of the British MI6 in terms of “conflicting”: “What remained incomprehensible to me was the complete paralysis of the French command in the face of events. That they were surprised was normal, but that they did not react with courage and speed was not. »
Indeed, what could be more “normal” than to be “surprised” by an attack of which we know all the details? …

“They seemed to have no plan. No action indicative of a manly reaction seemed to have been taken, or even contemplated, until Weygand’s arrival. All of this passed the understanding, I was told. »

End of quote (Spears Disaster Testimony page 129, 186)

Yes… It is indeed the case to say it. Especially since General Dill was present at the meeting of the 19th at Bondons, and had assured that plan N°4 would be executed without fail by the English!

Other curiosities worth noting in this report of April 22, 1940: “M. Paul Reynaud wishes to draw a picture of the current situation. In the land domain, the Allies find themselves in a position of inferiority from three points of view:

1° From a geographical point of view, the Germans have the advantage of acting on interior lines while the Allies must mount their operations on exterior lines. (-)

2° From the staffing point of view

3° From the point of view of armaments.

As far as manpower is concerned, the Allies currently have only around 100 divisions, compared to 190 German divisions, of which 150 can be engaged on the western front. »

On this point, we know that Paul Reynaud subtly does not count the Belgian and Dutch divisions, on which he is nevertheless certain to be able to count, and does not recall that on May 10, 135 German divisions will face 151 Allied divisions.

“As far as war material is concerned, the current situation is as follows: The Germans have a marked superiority when it comes to aviation and flak. They probably also have a certain superiority for artillery and ammunition stocks. It should not be forgotten that the Reich seized considerable booty in Czechoslovakia and Poland. »
Again, we know these numbers are wrong. And that all the officials present knew it perfectly! [3]

“What are the prospects for the future from this point of view? The Allies are undeniably making great efforts, but it is not possible to assign precise figures or coefficients to these efforts so as to establish a comparison with the German effort. »

New astonishing statement: Paul Reynaud claims not to know how much material the Allies have!

And we are, once again, at the crossroads of enchantments!
“Certainly the Allies have the advantage of being able to make major purchases in the United States. But even taking this last factor into account, it is impossible to say that the Allies could acquire an overwhelming superiority over the adversary. (-)

Remains the weapon of the blockade. (-)

The oil problem is particularly difficult, because Germany has powerful means of action as a supplier, which is Romania. If the Reich attacks the latter country, it seems impossible to prevent it from occupying it entirely.

Undoubtedly certain accidents of the kind which occurred during the last war could happen to the Rumanian wells; but a destruction of these wells would not be sustainable. »

End of quote (Bédarida The secret strategy of the phoney war pages 415, 416, 417, 418)

Here we will see in a future volume that this problem of seizing Romanian oil did not arise before the attack. We are therefore in the field of projection.
In reality, aware of the statements of Senator Jacques Bardoux and the figures provided by General Serrigny Paul Reynaud, like the highest French political leaders, knew perfectly well that Hitler would not have more than two months of ammunition and gasoline to defeat. Estimation that he officially confirmed in his speech to the Senate on May 16, 1940, and corroborated by the most recent studies, such as that of Mr Tooze. [4]

And the conclusion leaves no room for any doubt: 20 days before the German attack, the scales did not “fall out of Paul Reynaud’s eyes”. On the other hand, the fundamental lie of the omnipotence of industry and the German army was in the process of being officially established in the logic of the tale.

Big black capital at the heart of the conspiracy

In reality, we know perfectly well that “everyone knew everything about everyone”, not only about the real capabilities of the armies, or about the plans that were going to be implemented, but also about the intentions of each other.

And the best proof of this perfect knowledge of each other’s intentions, as well as of the major issues, brings us back once again to big black capital and its linchpins through another perfectly explicit example, that of the trip that Mr. Jacques Allier, member of the Management Board of the Banque de Paris et des Pays Bas, in charge of relations with the Norwegian Nitrogen Company (Norsk Hydro) – which the Banque de Paris et des Pays Bas had helped to create in 1905 with the Wallenberg group.
Mandated by Mr. Raoul Dautry, French Minister of Armaments and Republican architect of rearmament under Daladier, he arrived in Oslo in February 1940, a month and a half before the German attack and while the “Manstein” plan was still in progress. study, to ask the director to give him the 200 liters of heavy water that the factory had produced and which could have been used by the Germans to make an atomic bomb.

This heavy water, given free so that it escapes the Nazis will be transferred to the cellars of the Collège de France in Paris in March, then evacuated to London before the defeat.

This is yet another demonstration that the Allies and neutral countries were fully warned, not only by their best agents, but also by the means of “big interests” and European cartels of Hitler’s plan to attack Norway.

And how could it have been otherwise?

All European States, warned by Roessler, are complicit

Thus, is it not clear that all the governments involved in the major issues of this war, both in Europe and in the United States or Russia, have respected the same omerta! Their witnesses lied, in the same proportion as the French and for approximately the same reasons. Their historians knowingly either distorted the truth or avoided the inconvenient questions under the same threats.

And when they had the misfortune to insist, questioning their governments like many British and American researchers quoted in the introduction, they were accused of serving conspiracy theories, or even violently countered by the Secret Services of their own country!

This was the case for Mr. Martin Allen – whom we know well for having denounced the Windsor plot and many other British betrayals on which we will return very largely – when he evoked the innumerable networks under the control of the American government and the Grand black capital, passing through neutral countries, in order to exploit and then secure in tax havens the spoils of Nazi plunder in Europe.
When his work came out, he was falsely accused of having added falsified archives to those that existed in order to support his study. Accusation followed by all the military “historians” and other French historical-commercial that we know.
This while we easily recognize in this maneuver the expertise of the Action Services (MI6) of Her Gracious Majesty, specialists in forgery and use.

Services which I defy to raise my accusation, by proving the contrary, for that would require them to demonstrate that His Majesty’s Government would have had no interest in destroying the reputation of a respected historian. So that there was never French military treason, and that Big Black Capital, as well as the British European Party, had nothing to do with this war!

And we understand better why I took the precaution of never, or almost never, consulting the archives, and of basing myself only on writings known to all. Works written by the best academics going completely in the direction of Mr. Allen and that the secret services of his Majesty will have great difficulty in all discrediting.

If they ever have the honesty to open them…

We also understand that, because it is very risky to question the “theory” of the conspiracy, on the other side of the Channel the colleagues of Mr Allen took the part of expressing themselves with the most extreme precautions, such as Mr. Julian Jackson, who, in a collective work, “dared” to affirm under the title:

Strange French defeat, or strange English victory?

“Many facts are there to remind us that tendencies towards collaboration with the Nazis existed at least as much in Great Britain as in France. To imagine Lloyd Georges or the Duke of Windsor in the role of Pétain is far from absurd. (-) Famous military specialist Basil Liddle Hart believed in March 1940 that Britain should negotiate as quickly as possible the best terms (of dealing with Germany) since there is no way to ‘avoid defeat’. Liddle Hart resisted until the end of the war, fearing that a German defeat would lead to Soviet domination of the European continent. He sees in Hitler a reasonable statesman. (-)

Whatever the ulterior motives of one or the other in this debate, one thing is clear: The idea of ​​seeking the terms of peace was on the agenda of the British government at the end of May 1940.

End of quote (May – June 1940 French defeat, German victory, under the eye of foreign historians pages 177, 198, 204)

“since there is no way to avoid defeat”.

Be the common message sent by all the members of the international conspiracy to the Peoples amazed at so much nerve!

And we are no longer surprised that the Blitzkrieg theory was invented by this military historian, and that it brought him so many medals from governments, and so much media coverage. So such a fine fortune. Such a great talent deserves recognition!
Insolence bringing us back to the documents discovered by Mr. Delpla evoking the contacts made by Lord Halifax with the Italians in an attempt to short-circuit Churchill, [5] and therefore requiring no further comment for the moment.

In Germany the same law of silence

Another victim of this deliberate desire to cover up betrayal:

1. Julius Mader, German historian – whom we remember having already met in the 4th volume – author of a book on the generals who revealed the underside of the cards on the Nazi side, in particular with the written testimony of General Piekenbrock who attested that he did not there was no German 5th Column able to organize all the betrayals observed on the ground during the Battle of France such as: Displacement of civilian populations, bridges not jumped, orders for withdrawals in series, assassinations of officers and other “tanks ghosts”…
   Here is what he reports of the pressures he had to undergo for having published this document denouncing, among other things, the relations between the Reich and the cartels of Big Black Capital, AGFA, IG Farben, and other mass murderers who, having established their factories in the heart of the concentration camps, used the deportees to further increase their pharaminous profits without worrying about the thousands of victims they caused: “The content of this book being explosive, the command of the secret services of the federal republic and that of the Bundeswehr were to use all the means at their disposal to prevent, or at least thwart, its publication. These networks, which continue the criminal tradition of Hitler’s generals, fear the truth as the devil fears holy water. Thus, for example, the Wehrkunde – a newspaper dealing with military problems, the official organ of the militarist society for the information of the Armies, gave this solemn warning in its columns as early as December 1966: “Very recently, Mader addressed to former officers of the Abwehr letters “from a good German” asking them to send him information, activity reports etc., intended for a documentation that he would be in the process of constituting . In fact, it is a sneak attack directed against the former Abwehr and the Federal German Information Service (one of the first secret service offices in West Germany whose power stands immediately behind that of the Chancellery itself) as well as against the book, recently published by Gert Buchheit, entitled: The German Secret Service – History of Military Defence…

Therefore, it is expressly recommended not to provide any information or documentation to addresses located in the Soviet zone (i.e. in the German Democratic Republic).

Four months later, publications issued under the aegis of the Federal Service for the Protection of the Constitution repeated this kind of warning with even more precision. It was written there:

“If you receive a letter from a certain Julius Mader, do not answer and forward it to the competent Security Services… The current work which Mader is currently working on is to be published under the following title: Hitler’s Spy Generals Depose…
From these reactions, which also underline the necessity and topicality of my work, we can objectively deduce several points:

– First, Hitler’s spy generals benefit from complicities even within West German political circles, but these accomplices are no longer unknown to us.
– Secondly, each of the former officers of the Secret Service of Hitler’s Army had the opportunity to demonstrate their break with their past and to contribute to History by telling the only Truth.

– Third, it has become clear that capitalist circles and high officials of the federal administration have an interest in keeping the past activity of a large number of Nazi war criminals in the shadows by thwarting any investigation of them. »

So of course, I can already hear the “accredited experts” affirming that this work by Mr. Mader was undoubtedly a propaganda tool for the benefit of East Germany, and that it must be placed in the context of the Cold War, before judging its validity.

If so, please answer this…

The German “submarine” is still not sunk

Indeed, concerning the privileged relations between the Nazi Reich and the “democracies” in the Anglo-Saxon style, it is not in vain to come back to yet another “forgotten detail”: The importance that the intelligence services of the Wehrmacht (Abwehr) during the Hitler period, then after the war.

Importance largely minimized since, by highlighting the action of some Democratic officers who fought with all their might against Nazism, such as Admiral Canaris, Oster, or Lahoussen, but about whom we must not forget that they were, for the only part that could be demonstrated, responsible in 12 European countries, without counting the USSR, for the execution or the deportation of 1 million 277 754 resistance fighters and anti-fascist sympathizers.
It was these Abwehr leaders, renamed anti-Communists for the purposes of the fairy tale, who were carefully protected after the war by the American government, then re-infiltrated to the highest level of responsibility in Germany from the West, such:

Joseph Müller, who became one of the Bavarian leaders of the Christian Democratic Party, or Hermann Götz, member of the executive committee of the CDU branch in Hesse, chairman of the committee for refugees, and of the working committee on “internal and external security questions” , director of the federal work community for assistance to soldiers, member of the Ackermanngemeinde within the Society of Sudeten compatriots, Member of Parliament in Bonn from 1949 and, from 1968, Chairman of the Work Commission of social policy of the CDU / CSU group in the Bundestag.
Among the early members of the FDP we also find Doctor Victor Hoven who was once captain and battalion commander in the Brandenburg division of the Abwehr, the section in charge of the liquidation of opponents, who had formed a “fifth column fascist in Belgium.

In 1954, this senior Nazi official already sat in the F.D.P. of the Land of Nordrhein-Westfalen, and in 1957 entered the Bundestag.
Another notorious example: The captain of the Abwehr 2, Theodor Oberländer, a former Nazi Gauleiter who first reappeared on the political scene as a member of the F.D.P. to then become president of the Federal Association of Refugees and Despoiled (BHE) and finally land, in 1956, in the CDU of Adenauer.
Same presence at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs with Vice-Admiral Léopold Bürkner, former head of the foreign service under Canaris, who in 1949 became adviser to the ministers of foreign affairs, or even Otto Wagner, alias Doctor Delius, colonel at the Abwehr and head of the K.O. of Bulgaria who, with his friend Commander Alexander Cellarius, former head of the K.O. of Finland Estonia, will become Permanent Advisors to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for South-Eastern and North-Eastern European issues.

And all of this is understandable, if we remember that these ties were not new, since these men of the Abwehr found unconditional support from the highest German representatives of international high finance, such as Hermann Abs , who became chairman and managing director of Deutsche Bank after the war and adviser to successive chancellors of the West German republic, but who occupied in 1942 as chairman of the board of directors of the state bank and representative of the IG Farben, around 40 management positions in industrial companies both in Germany and abroad. That in this capacity, and in full collaboration with the Herman Goering Werke, he exercised a direct influence on La Minière du Sud-Est (under Goering’s control) and Continental Oil (under the control of J.D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil by the Ohio Oil Company) in the Netherlands, in Luxembourg, in Austria, in Czechoslovakia, in Poland, in the Balkan states and within the “Russia” committee as far as the occupied territories of the Caucasus, putting the commercial and industrial information obtained by its spy services in the service of the Abwehr.

We can therefore affirm, without fear of being contradicted, that these trusts under American control, and the German secret services worked throughout the war, hand in hand, in order to organize the looting of Europe.

Here is what Dr. Ilgner, former director of the “NW 7 office” (subversion department) of IG Farben, and vice-president of the Central European Economic Committee, confessed to his contacts with the Canaris before the commission of inquiry of the American military tribunal in Nuremberg: “The Abwehr, like the service of the war economy, wanted to obtain economic information on foreign countries and was very interested in research from the department of political economy… It is true that the information of IG Farben was so complete that there was not the slightest change to be made in its methods of investigation. The political economy department of the IG was then the best and most comprehensive in Germany…”

And what better source of intelligence to identify all the goods still lootable in Europe, then to organize the control of the greatest industrial power of the continent?

Thus we understand better why in 2019, Germany suddenly seemed to discover that more than half of the politicians and senior civil servants in office in the post-war years were former active Nazis…”[6]

So while waiting for our experts to oppose other archives and testimonies to those put forward by Mr. Mader, let our witness conclude: “But the fact that in the end my book saw the light of day clearly shows that the arm of German imperialism is no longer long enough to mutilate historical truth, to prevent the revelation of facts which contribute to its knowledge.

It is in this spirit of respect for historical truth that I thank the personalities and the management of the services of the German Democratic Republic and of other countries who have provided me with effective assistance by communicating their archives to me.
I would particularly like to thank the working “team” of former intelligence officers who organized numerous contacts for me in the two Germanys and contributed, through the mass of their information, to the raw material of this work. »

End of quote (Mader German generals depose – Introduction)

Everyone knows that the list of former Nazis totally subservient to the “Liberators” and their international interests who have reached the highest positions of responsibility in the post-war German state is impressive. The only crime of M. Julius Mader was therefore to quote them, when they should have been “forgotten”.

Just as it was necessary to remove from the fairy tale the “Octagon” system set up by Allen Dulles, still at the head of the American Secret Service, using the gold stolen from the Peoples of Europe by the SS.

A network which, drawing on this “war chest” sheltered in Swiss coffers, mounted a new arms traffic to rearm Germany and gave all the financial means to the CDU to elect its candidate Konrad Adenauer in the Chancellery to lead the Cold War. [7]

And we understand better why Adenauer replaced in command positions men such as Reinhard Gehlen, personal liaison officer in May 1940 between Field Marshal von Brauchitsch and Guderian’s army group, so a man who could only be informed of the French betrayal, to make him the head of the West German secret service and thus put hundreds of other senior Nazi officials at the service of the CIA.

Just back from the elevator…

---

[1] See Volume N° 1: French military betrayal and Volume N°2: Controversies on some “forgotten” betrayals

[2] See volume 1: French military betrayal

[3] For artillery: 7,378 German guns against 14,000 for the allies. For tanks: 2,439 German tanks against 4,204 Allied tanks. For aviation: 2,589 German planes, against nearly 6,000 Allied planes of equivalent quality.

[4] See Volume N°1: French military betrayal

[5] See also volume N°2: Controversies on some “forgotten” betrayals

[6] Note to the attention of curious readers, the publication in 2005 of a work of more than 700 pages, written by Mr. Ernst Klee entitled: Das Personen lexikon zum drittent Reich. Wer war was vor und nach 1945? proposing the list of thousands of Nazis who obtained post-war high positions in multinationals, or within the German government.

[7] [7] This shell company was created in Switzerland by the arms dealer Rudolf de Ruscheweyh who had made himself known as an intermediary between the Swiss machine tool factory Oerlikon-Bührle, entirely bought between 1927 and 1929 by Herr Emil Jorg Bührle one of the officers already involved in the secret rearmament of Germany in Russia and who, since then, mainly produced anti-aircraft guns sold to both the Allies and the Axis forces. It was under this cover that Ruscheweyh was able to organize the flight of Nazi capital to tax havens and the offshore accounts of Big Black Capital.

After the war, this economically “out of control” system of “democracies” was therefore able to freely reestablish links with “American friends” through the intermediary of Allen Dulles, head of the OSS in Switzerland (ancestor of the CIA), who immediately recruited the former Nazis he needed, in particular the SS who had the upper hand on this treasure and the members of the Secret Services who had been in charge of locating the goods to be looted.

The company Octogon Trust, officially specialized in wealth management and import-export, was then responsible for organizing the flight of war criminals, especially to South America, where they will once again serve Big Black Capital, fomenting on demand the “spontaneous revolutions” or “counter-revolutions” necessary for the overthrow of governments that are too republican…. This system will be described in all its details in the volumes to be published. And for the impatient in: The Testament of Sidney Warburg