What awaits us tomorrow

What awaits us tomorrow

In October 2017, the Institute of International Finance published the official figures for the debt that big international capital had accumulated: 237,000 billion dollars.
That is 192,000 billion euros, or more than three times the annual economic activity of the planet. So more than $30,000 per inhabitant, including newborns, old people and the billion people who live on less than €1 a day.
Figures of course on the rise in 2018 and which were already estimated at 250,000 billion dollars. In addition, the amount of bank derivatives in the world had exceeded 1,500,000 billion dollars, or more than 1,000 times the value of gold held by all central banks in the world (1,400 billion $). Which, in the event of a crash, represented a total liability of approximately two million billion dollars. That is about 2500 times the world GDP (estimated at $80,000 billion for 2018)!
At the same time, the capital of the major global banks only represented between 0.15% and 0.6% of their commitments on these derivatives.

Thus, for each asset, the bill was that much higher, and increased by about a trillion dollars a year.
To get an idea of ​​this speed, think that in the United States alone, between 1776 and 2006, it had reached 8,000 billion, and that it only took eleven years for it to be multiplied by 2.5. .
Snowball effect which explains how, during his two terms, Barack Obama will have succeeded in creating more debt than all the forty-three former American presidents since George Washington!
And yet, all this remains abstract. This is why a few words of explanation on the consequences of this madness will not be too much.

First, as everyone will have understood, the debt will never be repaid, which means that millions of shareholders will find themselves ruined during the greatest financial crash of all time.
So let’s imagine this catastrophic scenario, which is impossible to predict, but as it could occur on an indefinite date…

For starters, governments will continue to pretend they have the solution for a while longer by printing more money, which will only amplify the problem.

Then they will reverse which will lead to hyperinflation, with interest rates reaching 15-20%.
And we see that in 2018 the process has just begun with Wall Street moving away from zero rate lending.
As for real estate loans in France, in June 2018, they posted a rate of 1.7%, while in the USA, they exceeded 4.6% (FED key rate at 2%)…
So soon central banks will lose control over their manipulation of interest rates. And it is only then that the real difficulties will begin…

First, as debt implodes, all bubble assets will collapse. Stocks, bonds and real estate will decline 80-100%.
Either what happened between 1929 and 1932, when the Dow Jones fell by 90%, between 2000 and 2002 when the Nasdaq declined by 80%, or between 2007-2010 when the subprime crisis “surprised” even the secretary to the US Treasury, Mr. Bear Stearns who, by disconnecting Lehman Brothers and its 660 billion in commitments, thought that the shock could be absorbed.
Fatal error which led in a few days to the fall of AIG, the largest insurance company in the world, and then the rest of the structure.
The only difference with what might be expected is that during these three major crashes global debt was lower, and asset bubbles much lower. This made it possible to settle the crisis of 1929 at the cost of the Second World War.
On the other hand, the last two did not solve the fundamental problem, but simply placed some patches to try to remedy the immediate effects, – patches which will blow with the repeal of the Dodd-Frank law and the policy of world economic war desired by Trump – the debt would only increase, but with an exponential effect!
Indeed, if we consider only the 2008 crisis, the economic and financial planet which had generated a debt of 140,000 billion dollars, was saved by a fiscal stimulus policy which enabled global growth to rebound, without however, generate high inflation, since the trend was deflationary.

Moreover, thanks to the action of central banks which flood the markets with liquidity, long-term interest rates have not increased, and have even fallen, sometimes reaching zero or even negative levels. The recovery therefore benefited from a perfect context: low inflation, ultra-accommodative monetary policies and excessively low government bond interest rates.
The problem is that the printing press which literally flooded the debt market (more than 4,000 billion dollars in the United States) did not spare the euro since in 2017, the debt of the European Central Bank (ECB ) exceeded that of the FED with 4.157 billion euros, or more than 4.568 billion dollars, thus becoming, after China, the largest issuer of money in the world. Why ?

Quite simply because since March 2015 the institution has decided to buy 60 billion euros worth of assets per month from international banks holding the debt of European states. Volume increased to 80 billion in March 2016 before returning to 60 billion in 2017.
Here again by printing euros, without guarantee since the recovery of the economy in the euro zone is far from being able to integrate the printing of so many billions of euros.
Europe has therefore followed the process of headlong rush initiated in the United States by the FED. And what other choice did she have?
But today, everyone knows that the increase in this debt, which reached 4,427.5 billion euros, or 41% of the GDP of the euro zone at the time of the balance sheet in November 2017, did not succeed in reviving stable growth. based on a sustainable economy, since European GDP has obviously not increased by 41% in 3 years!!
This means that European economic growth is simply money supply growth, not normal, healthy economic growth.
Thus with the economic war started by the USA and the programmed collapse of the dollar, therefore the crash to come, the debt should be more than 230,000 billion dollars, i.e. more than double that in 2008, but with an additional ” disaster plan” in the more or less long term considering the crash as an ultimately profitable solution for the indebted states and the banks that will have been able to prepare for it.
In other words, at the expense of both small investors and national economies, and therefore taxpayers…
So there would be little more than China with its 3,200 billion dollars of foreign exchange reserves in all currencies and Germany, with its public surplus, which could weather the storm.
For the others, that is to say almost everyone, it would not be possible to restart the machine.

This explains why, in its October 2017 report, the IMF predicted for 2020 a rapid rise in interest rates, a 15% fall in the markets and a 7% decline in real estate prices. So global production down 1.7% on average. “The intensity of the shock is equal to a third of that recorded in 2008. Everyone can imagine the disaster if by chance the markets unscrew more significantly. »
And of course everyone knows that these markets WILL unscrew since the debt has increased out of control…

Moreover, even if the Dow Jones has been rising for 8 and a half years, going from 6,000 to 25,000 points. Or 400% increase, again. But here again we blithely “forget” the lessons of history which reminds us that the longest stock market rise in history lasted only nine years, between 1920 and 1929…

Thus, if we are to believe the most basic logic, it would therefore be a question of getting rid of, in the very near future in view of what is being prepared, approximately 2 quadrillion dollars of debts, unfunded liabilities, and derived products.
Which means 29 times the world’s GDP. In two words: The end of the financial system as we know it, since paper money, not being supported by any concrete standard, would be returned to its initial value: A piece of paper.
And one imagines the crowds gathering in panic in front of closed banks, or empty ATMs, to claim not their savings, i.e. a lifetime of work, but just a few pennies, in order to survive.
This helps to understand why today people are trying to persuade us to get rid of physical money, to use only virtual currency.
You might as well avoid these painful scenes, and unnecessary deforestation…

Fortunately, we are reassured! Such a disaster would really only affect the poorest, since the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) came into force on January 1, 2016 and was unanimously ratified by all governments and parliaments. members of the OECD, allowing bankrupt banks to settle their debts by legally taking over the bank deposits of its savers, was capped at 100,000 euros!

The problem obviously being that if the banks go bankrupt, 100,000 euros will not be worth much…

Another “happy” consequence: The implosion of debt and assets would lead to the largest transfer of wealth in history: The middle-rich would lose everything, while the poorest would lose only their debts. Thus, in this general misery, only the richest would come out of it. Which unfortunately would not go without posing some problems here again because if today one in ten people in the world live on less than 2 dollars a day, Bill Gates, the world’s first fortune, and even if he continues to distribute his wealth as generously as he has for some years, pays out a million dollars a day for 2738 years to spend the 1000 billion dollars he should have if he lives to be 85.
Which should even give him the possibility of withdrawing to Mars with his whole family, in the event of a world conflict…

Because make no mistake, this is what threatens us

Especially if we integrate into these highly threatening data, the consequences of global warming and massive population exoduses, and therefore the series of conflicts, revolutions and humanitarian disasters of all kinds that these will cause.
Diverse and varied upheavals that will push, because here we are no longer in the field of foresight but of certainty, each state of influence, thinking above all of its survival, to defend its particular interests by force.
And we understand that in recent years the military budgets of the richest states have literally exploded, since in 2015 military spending in the world, which until now had stagnated, rose to 1676 billion dollars, or 2.3% of GNP world, registering a one percent increase in one year and that these do not stop increasing, with at the head of the biggest buyers: The United States with 36% of world military expenditure (612.5 billion dollars and 7 500 nuclear warheads), China, the second largest defense budget, which between 2006 and 2015 multiplied by 132 its budget (215 billion dollars and 300 warheads). Russia with 76 billion and 8,500 nuclear warheads. But also the European Union, which has planned to increase its budget by 8.6% from 2016.

And why spend so much money on weapons, if not for the purpose of using them one day?…

A proposal which is undoubtedly not beyond the understanding of a Trump, who could thus try to impose by arms the American hegemonic will on the world, in order to compensate for the loss of economic power, and therefore political , greenback.
Because who does not know that a “good war” will always remain a magic lever to regain a popularity rating in danger after a monetary collapse?
Besides, isn’t this how Roosevelt and Wall Street reboosted the American economy by unleashing the Second World War after the crisis of 1929?

Conclusion :

Knowing, as Reuters in London published in February 2021 that: “Aid linked to the pandemic created 24,000 billion dollars of additional debt last year, bringing global debt to a record level of 281,000 billion dollars (233.330 billion euros) and the global debt/GDP ratio at more than 355%, according to a study. ” Phaminous figures that the Institute of International Finance (IIF), supplemented by specifying that the state support programs contributed half to this increase, while companies, banks and households around the world added respectively 5,400, 3,900 and 2.6 trillion dollars. Which means global debt has increased by 35 percentage points. That it is more than 355% of GDP, and that this increase is 10 points higher than in 2008 and 15 points higher than in 2009. All that remains is to draw the expected conclusion: The expected debt for 2019 which was initially not to exceed by 2020: “230,000 billion dollars, more than double that in 2008” is at the time of writing this article in February 2021 of 281,000 billion dollars”. And in this case, explain to me how to bring it down other than by provoking when the time comes, that is to say once the big international black capital has been able to protect its assets, this great world crash which should put an end to this mad race, by destroying the savings of the Peoples?

TO READ MORE – MODIFIER LES LIENS

Click here

To put an end to the “conspiracy theory”

To put an end to the “conspiracy theory”

“When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness”,

Alexis de Tocqueville

We affirm that it is now possible to put an end to the “theory” and even to clearly demonstrate that there was indeed a plot and that it remains relevant. That all the conspiratorial theses, whatever their name: Elders of Zion, Illuminati, Rosicrucian, Synarchy, Jewish or Freemason conspiracy, and other Lemurian scarecrows only exist, and are blown up by the media, only to better hide the one and only conspiracy of which historians have proof:

The one organized by certain powers of money throughout the 20th century and until our days, to impose the wars which made it possible to plunder the resources of so many countries.

Indeed, the French military betrayal, which in itself would be only a banal historical event because they abound in our History, opens another question much more important for our 21st century: Why certain French patriots, often even republicans, did they wanted this reversal of alliance to associate with the Nazi Reich?

And this is where we come in, since while waiting for the works to appear to finally inform the Peoples about this essential part of their history, we are now offering you to take note of the major economic issues which, alone, could bring such “incomprehensible” decisions…

All information also developed on our YouTube channel, while waiting for the works on the question, currently in the writing phase, to be available for sale.

Our YouTube channel

Discover

The war aims of the great Empires

L’historiographie mondiale nous présente les conflits du 20ème siècle comme le résultat de tensions entre pays.
Or, rien de plus faux, puisque les deux premières Guerres mondiales ainsi que la Guerre froide qui suivit, résultent d’une confrontation entre les deux grands Empires dominants : France et Angleterre ; et les trois émergeants : États-Unis, Russie et Allemagne.

Le premier de ces conflits, déclenché en 1914, répondait à une triple préoccupation des empires britannique et américain :


1° Never allow the formation of a continental European alliance. And for that to prevent the rapprochement of France, Germany and Russia.


2° In this order of idea, it was necessary to stop the development of trade by rail uniting each day more the continent, since the beginning of the “industrial era”.
Indeed, France had built the Trans-Siberian railway line with Russia, which offered to transport goods faster and more cheaply than by sea, from Europe to China and India. Two countries considered as the “preserve” of the British Empire.
At the same time, Germany, an ally of the Ottoman Empire, was building another railway linking Berlin to Basra, thus giving it access to the fabulous Iranian oil deposits.
Oil supplying Her Majesty’s fleet and which, if it fell into German hands, would have directly competed with the two largest oil companies of the beginning of the century: Mr. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil and the British magnate’s Royal Dutch Shell Deterding, respectively master of Wall Street and the City of London.


3° Germany was building a merchant fleet capable of exporting goods from its ultra-modern factories to South America and even the United States. Equally intolerable prospect for Wall Street.


The Second World War took up these commercial and geopolitical fundamentals, while admitting other parameters directly concerning the large Wall Street cartels.
Indeed, the extraordinary profits brought to them by the First World War, during which they had been able to export raw materials, war material and supplies which England and France could no longer produce, had enabled them to place the Wall Street stock exchange in the first place of the world economy. A lucrative market to which the victory of 1918 put an end.
We therefore understand all the interest they could have in provoking a second one just as profitable and even, if possible, a little more…

War as Remedy

And it is here that the fundamentals of the “international conspiracy” appear, which we will nevertheless easily understand, as they are logical.
The whole thing can be summed up in five steps:

  • 1° After the German defeat of 1918, the victorious countries obtained as war compensation, at the same time the colonies of the defeated countries, the industrial patents, certain large industries, and as many deposits of raw materials.
  • 2° To manage this manna, these victorious States resold these goods at miserable prices to their biggest trusts. They therefore found themselves not only with a huge mass of new businesses to manage, but also with the responsibility of keeping them running to avoid a recession.
  • 3° The climate of the early 1920s being at world peace, companies throughout the European continent therefore began to produce equipment for civilian use, with the consequence of considerable overproduction leading to fierce competition not only between European countries but also with American companies unable to curb imports from ruined countries where the cost price was much lower.
  • 4° The result was a violent recession culminating in the great stock market and economic crash begun in 1927 in Germany and culminating in the world crisis of 1929.
  • 5° And we understand better why the big global cartels, having of course foreseen from the beginning of the 1920s that this obligation to maintain their oversized companies to meet the needs of the Great War could only lead to this infernal spiral, s logically oriented towards the only market capable of absorbing such a production capacity: A new war.

Indeed, at a time when the joys of the consumer society had not yet reached the people accustomed to a simple and rural way of life, how could a housewife be asked to buy 100 saucepans, when two or three were enough for her? widely.
On the other hand, the war market, involving the destruction of the material produced as it left the factories and the consumption of raw materials in a just-in-time fashion, was the only conceivable outcome in order to avoid mass unemployment, ruin. savings, and even a possible world revolution in order to put an end to this frantic race towards overconsumption.

The control of the cartels on the world

The maneuver took place in two stages.

First, as early as 1917, American cartels began to funnel their huge profits from the European war into the economy of the first empire to collapse: Russia.
Maneuver repeated in 1920, with the unconditional surrender of the Austro-Hungarian and German empires, by investing essentially in all the heavy industries and natural resources of Eastern European countries.

Massive investments imitated this time by the English and French cartels.

Then, in order to create the conditions essential to a new conflict, they worked, from 1922 by certain secret clauses of the Treaty of Rapallo, to secretly rearm the two great losers: Germany and Russia.

Knowing that ruined Russia should have used all its energy to raise its ruins and that Germany, in the same state of disrepair, had moreover been forbidden to rearm, the malevolent intention is established.

This Anglo-Saxon initiative was immediately followed by the major continental European cartels, unconcerned about being left behind in this rearmament race.
So while the Wall Street cartels – supported by those of the City of London in Germany – were rearming future dictatorships, continental Europeans were rearming democracies.

And we begin to understand how all this will degenerate for the greater benefit of each other.

The birth of Europe

Faced with this new distribution of the cards of the world economy, the countries of continental Europe organized themselves in order to avoid a new devastating war.

Driven by the Peoples, European cartels and organizations of veterans and peace-loving activists united in a new project: The creation of the United States of Europe.

Project supported by the League of Nations and the governments of the various nations concerned, with France and Germany in the forefront, which led to a first concrete result on September 30, 1926, with the first version of a European Union bringing together the cartels steel. Initiative soon followed by all the other cartels: nitrogen, coal, electricity, etc.

This first European Union, much “forgotten” by theoreticians of the incomprehensible, had two declared objectives:

  • Give Europe a republican Constitution based on the great principles of the Enlightenment society and humanism.
  • Combat the infiltration of Wall Street into its economy.

So of course, one can wonder why the big European cartels seemed indifferent to this degradation clearly announcing a new conflict. However, it would have been easy for them to denounce the secret rearmament of Germany before the League of Nations and put an end to the escalation.

And the answer is obvious: Because they too were counting on profiting from the promised manna, not only by manufacturing the weapons of the democracies, but by supplying Germany with the raw materials of which its mixed-capital factories were sorely lacking. .

Which they did shamelessly. And we understand better now why the “family secret” was able to prevail for so long…

The ideological pretext

To fuel the desired conflict, and because it is essential to correctly manipulate the Peoples before asking them to be complacently killed to enrich a few “powerful”, the same cartelist interests undertook to first finance the Russian Communist Party by offering to Stalin and his friends the financing and support necessary for them to seize power.

Then they supported by various contracts the economy of the USSR, before acting in the same way in Germany by bringing Hitler to power and by supporting the economy of the Reich until bringing it to a semblance of power, apparently convincing enough to claim to threaten the USSR.

Communism, entirely financed and installed in power by Wall Street, therefore very naturally opposed fascism, supported by the same interests.

It was under these auspices that republican democratic Europe was finally forced to give way to a fascist Europe, while generalized rearming emerged from the shadows to take over the entire space of international relations.

Another great “forgotten” of complacent historians: French military treason, which today can be considered as the “keystone” of this Great Lie of the 20th century.
Indeed, without this essential piece of the puzzle, it was easy to set aside the major economic issues to seem interested only in political issues, therefore in this fable that was: “The struggle of the Powers of Good against those of Evil”.

The Blitzkrieg Theory

Based, as we have seen, on an uninterrupted series of incomprehensible coincidences and decisions, or a series of “miracles”, this theory of illogicality deliberately “forgets” to recall that:

1° Hitler’s army was much inferior in quality and quantity to that aligned by the Allies:

Here are the latest figures unanimously accepted by historians concerning the forces present on May 10, 1940, the day of the German attack in the west:

  • 135 German divisions, against 151 Allied divisions.
  • 7,378 German guns against 14,000 for the allies.
  • 2,439 German tanks against 4,204 Allied tanks.
  • 3,864 German aircraft against 4,900 Allied aircraft

Knowing that the German material was not superior to the allied material, but in general inferior, in particular for the tanks, and that the German army had at the time of attacking the great empires of the west, only for one month gasoline and ammunition.

Knowing on the other hand that the allies had been informed as early as March 10, 1940 by many informants – including five of the generals closest to the Führer – of all the details of the so-called “Manstein” invasion plan definitively adopted on February 17 , and the date and time of the attack as early as April 31.

How can we imagine that the Allied General Staff could have been both destitute of equipment and “surprised” by a revolutionary strategy, as the States version claims (always in the plural)?

Conclusion

It is by carefully keeping these various data in memory that everyone will be able to follow the detailed explanations that we offer you on our YouTube channel.

No doubt they will be enough to give you an “intimate conviction” about this military betrayal and the major issues that motivated it, before our forthcoming books offer you the archives, testimonies and work of the best researchers who have worked on this major subject, often for more than twenty years…

Ici lien vers la page suivante : On vous explique

Hope

Hope

One thing, only one, harms the planet and the People: The lie.

Without truth, they have no power over their destiny. This is what needs to be changed.

Indeed, to accept that the lies of States continue in the same mode, is to renounce to exercise all control over the men of the “establishment”.

On the contrary, reclaiming the experiences of the past is not only opening up the right to demand absolute transparency on the major decisions involving the different countries, but also the participation of the representatives of the Peoples in their elaboration.

Once this evidence is well understood, we can all act together to influence the “Powerful”, because each decision taken over the next few years will be crucial for the future of Humanity.

And the question will arise: Are we going to continue on the same mode of “growth at all costs. When we know perfectly well that this was the mainspring of the powerful mechanism that brought about so much destruction during the 20th century?

Or will we prefer to change our mode of operation by eliminating from our reasoning the principles of competition and conquest, of limitless growth, in order to replace them with those of sound management of technological achievements, and cooperation between Peoples?

A dream now within our reach thanks to new means of communication, and since the legitimacy of deciding the future of our societies has changed sides.

You will soon find on this site the links allowing you to contact the partner associations, which will dream this ideal world with you.

Join us

Click here

Join the associations of artists and citizens

Join the associations of artists and citizens

Subscribe to our Newsletter to be informed of the latest progress and upcoming meetings, signing sessions, history cafés, etc.

Newsletter Sign-Up

Click here

The Angry Historians are not a structured association, but a communication tool, a platform through which we can express ourselves, according to the principles so well laid down by Barthélémy Saint-Hilaire:

“In a democracy, you need absolute freedom to express what you think. The citizen owes to the fatherland the fruit of his meditations. Socrates spends his life, and finally risks it, advising his fellow citizens, who hit him without discouraging him. The only limits to advice and criticism are the very peace of the City and the existence of the State; This is why freedom of the press holds such a place in all modern states which, in becoming free, come closer and closer to the model government of democracy. »

True Democracy – Barthélémy Saint-Hilaire

And we are well aware of our isolation. But our job is to research, to do the work of an ant, of a “bookworm”, and we devote all our time to that.

This is why we do not have time to organize the meetings, however essential, that we would like to have with you.

Fortunately, thanks to the countless people who have already supported us for twenty years, some associative projects are underway.

They will allow each interested person to join us and participate in the actions they will propose.

While waiting to be able to subscribe to their News Letter, and in order to keep you informed of these events, find us on the site of the Éditions du Mouton noir which will give you the dates of the next signing sessions, and other “Cafés d’Histoire where you can meet us.

Mouton noir editions

The proofs of the theft of General Gamelin’s archives by the French Government

The proofs of the theft of General Gamelin’s archives by the French Government

General Gamelin’s personal archives, including the Journal de Marche du Cabinet Gamelin, made up of several volumes representing approximately 3,000 pages, in which he had noted his day-to-day activities until his dismissal, suffered the same fate as thousands of compromising archives since his notebooks and personal diaries contained in two large trunks, were stolen in the absence of his wife, by an officer sent by the Ministry of Defense, less than an hour after the death of General Gamelin at the Val de Grâce hospital – and even before Mme Gamelin was notified – this was just before the officers of the Vincennes archives could come and affix the seals to the doors of the accommodation.

Among the many witnesses to this theft, General de Cossé Brissac, in charge at the time of the Army archives, wrote a letter for the British historian Martin Alexander, summarizing the facts quite well.

Other witnesses, including the son of General Petibon, aide-de-camp to the Generalissimo, and Colonel Le Goyet, another guardian of the archives and author of a well-known biography of the Generalissimo entitled Le Mystère Gamelin, attested to the existence of these documents.

Let’s start with how General de Cossé Brissac presented the facts:

APPENDIX DOCUMENT No. 1

Letter of April 6, 1983 from General de Cossé Brissac to Mr. Martin Alexander of the History Department of the University of Southampton, following the theft of the Journal de marche du Cabinet Gamelin.

Mr Doctor,

I received your substantial letter of March 23, 1983. I know your high historical qualifications and I am very honored that Mr. Jean Vanwelkenhuyzen reported my name to you.

I read you with great attention and interest. This reading inclines me to admit the probability of the existence, then the disappearance, of a “Journal de marche” of Cabinet Gamelin.

I effectively headed the Army Historical Service at the Château de Vincennes, from 1953 to 1966 – on the death of the late Xavier de Virieu.

To my great regret, I cannot give you testimony different from that of Lieutenant-Colonel Le Goyet and Lieutenant Cadilhon, then in charge of our contemporary section, who took charge of the general’s documents, after the seals were lifted.

I remember having learned, quite by chance, from an unofficial source, the seizure of General Gamelin’s archives, at his home, by a team that I suppose was ministerial, immediately after the general’s death at the hospital in the Val de Grace. Death that the General was still unaware of.

Shocked by the brutality and incorrectness of such a process, I then had it at heart to let the Gamelin family know that our Historical Service was foreign to this measure.
I myself attended the general’s funeral at Val de Grace. When the seized papers were handed over to Lieutenant-Colonel Le Goyet, representative of the Historical Service, I reiterated to the family my concern to satisfy any requests they may have, within the framework of our regulations.

Lieutenant-Colonel Le Goyet reported to me, at the time, on the lifting of the seals which he had attended and on the inventory of the documents received, then drawn up by him.

I’m sure there was no trace of the March Diary, which you assume not without reason, the existence, then the disappearance.

I admit that your presentation makes me regret today not having shown more curiosity.

It is true that my previous work on the Second World War had mainly oriented me towards the German archives, and very little towards those of the former generalissimo.

Above all, we must not forget the circumstances that closely followed the death of General Gamelin: The collapse of a regime, the appearance of a new power with all the changes of teams, following this complete governmental renovation.

You will not be surprised, I hope, that I entrust the delivery of this letter to my friend and distant successor, General Delmas, who must not be unaware of its content.

Charles de Cosse Brissac

DOCUMENT N° 2

Excerpt from Volume No. 6 of the series The Great Lie of the 20th Century: The End of the Mysteries?

The Gamelin’s “papers”

“On January 21, 1958, General Gamelin, following a bad fall, was hospitalized in Val de Grâce. He is nearly eighty-six years old and his condition is serious. In his little room he will live three months of long agony. (-) He died on April 18 and Mrs. Gamelin had the painful surprise, on returning from Val de Grace, to find that the seals were affixed to the general’s office at her home, 55 avenue Foch in Paris. The Minister of National Defence, through the police commissioner of the 16th arrondissement, strictly enforced the regulatory texts (affixing seals). Colonel Consigny represented the Minister. »

We now know the exact circumstances of this “regulatory” application of the seals, since Colonel Consigny, who had had the apartment opened to him by the concierge in the absence of Mme Gamelin, was the only one who could have stolen the Journal walk and the general’s personal notebooks just before they are put down.

It was therefore only on June 4, nearly two months after the affixing of these seals, that Colonel Le Goyet took possession of what remained of the general’s archives: “On April 30, 1958, a ministerial decision prescribed Army Historical Service to assist a military magistrate in unsealing and recovering documents belonging to the Departments of National Defense and Foreign Affairs. I am designated to accomplish this mission, Lieutenant Cadilhon and Chief Warrant Officer Brun accompany me. The operation took place on June 4, 1958, in the presence of Magistrate Colonel Jallut, the 3rd class steward Falcout, the police commissioner of the 16th arrondissement in uniform, Madame Gamelin, two family members and an attorney. Everything is disorder… Papers taken out of drawers are scattered, others are piled up on the ground, others in dusty canteens… In silence we begin the first sorting. After an hour, I intervene with Colonel Jallut and suggest that he transport everything to Vincennes to the Historical Service of the Army with the agreement of Mrs. Gamelin and General de Cossé-Brissac. After having received the assurance that all papers that are strictly personal, or that have no historical interest, will be returned to her, and after having taken the advice of her solicitor, Mme Gamelin accepts. All the documents are boxed and loaded into a van. End of quote (Le Goyet The Gamelin Mystery page 369, 370, 371).

Thus, starting from the principle that a man in charge of collecting, studying, then classifying the archives of a general having commanded in chief cannot ignore the importance of his Journal de marche and his personal notebooks which are the major pieces , how to explain that this senior official, in his biography of General Gamelin, does not mention their disappearance???

That he is content, without further comment, to report the presence of Colonel Consigny on April 18?
That he does not mention Mrs Gamelin’s complaints to General de Cossé Brissac and the latter’s letter of apology formally acknowledging the theft perpetrated before the affixing of the seals, then prefers to describe the generalissimo’s office completely put upside down by this hasty excavation, as if it were the normal state of the place?
As for the reason for which he was chosen to see to the classification and proper recording of these archives, certain gossips, after noting the zeal with which he contributed to the writing of the official Bible, were able to see in it an excellent means of to filter these documents again, in case some pieces could have escaped Colonel Consigny, sent by Mr. Chaban Delmas at that time Minister of War in the government of Mr. Félix Gaillard.

The reader will therefore not be surprised that the recordings and reports written during the day of May 15, 1940 following the betrayal of the Georges – Billotte tandem, have also “disappeared” from the history of this battle, or that the testimonies and reports of “Sedan Ghost Tanks” being altered or “blowing away”.

Ultimately, and regardless of this new historical sleight of hand, one thing is certain: This testimony gives us the assurance that all the documents on this battle, stolen or not, and in particular those concerning the role that the Generalissimo held there, are currently in the possession of the French State, since General Gamelin took good care to specify that he was able to dispose of all his archives in order to write his Souvenirs: “In particular, I must review closely a whole series of notes carefully recorded day by day, by myself or by my staff. (-) I took care to accompany my notes and memoirs with all the supporting documents that I could find in the archives of my former private staff. I wanted these documents to be filed in the trial file. Well took it from me, because some of them were destroyed by the military authorities who had custody of them, (emphasis mine) when the Germans entered the free zone on November 11, 1942 “

Decidedly, it seems to be a mania for destroying archives among our military, and we now understand when these “authorities” were able to destroy all the documents having any connection with the information provided by Roessler and the others.

Morotte of the destruction that Gamelin must have known since: “fortunately I had double the essential originals. (-) My archives have been carefully preserved, almost complete, but I had to put them away as long as France was occupied by the Germans. There are also facts, or opinions, which it is better to expose only with a certain distance and when the passions aroused by the crises we are going through have lost their acuity. »
End of quote (Gamelin Servir Tome 1 Introduction page II)

And the report is clear… Apparently the “passions” are not cooled.

Knowing that the double of these documents was destroyed by the French when the Germans entered the free zone on November 11, 1942, and that it is appropriate to add to all these “unfortunate” disappearances the thousands of archives seized by the “allies Anglo-Saxons” who, according to my personal conclusions, still serve to exert the blackmail essential to the maintenance of the “family secret”, one will not be surprised at the ease with which the thesis of illogicality was able to impose itself.

Economic and geopolitical questions left unanswered by official history

Economic and geopolitical questions left unanswered by official history

“We believe we are dying for our country: we are dying for industrialists.”

Anatole France,   L’Humanité, July 18, 1922

This elementary truth, so deeply felt by the Peoples and fought so much by the media under the pretext of conspiracy theory, has, to be demonstrated, only to take into account the facts and archives, and especially the strange “blanks” left by the theoreticians of the absurd.

In reality, each of us suspects that deliberately excluding economic issues from history is indicative of the desire to cover our tracks. We all know that we have to look for “who benefits from the crime”!

Questions still unanswered in 2021

What the general public, on the other hand, does not know is the extraordinary violence with which these state lies are imposed.

Thus, in 2021, and if we only consider the period 1919-1945, the answers to the following questions, although known to experts and historians, have still not been provided to the general public:

  • Why have the “experts” of all persuasions “forgotten” that the rearmament of Germany, begun in the USSR in 1923, under the secret clauses of the Treaty of Rapallo, was financed and carried out by English banks and trusts and Americans who had massively invested in German and Soviet industry?
  • How is it that the gigantic arms complexes “secretly” set up in the USSR by these same companies were able to build, between 1922 and 1934, and this in complete violation of international treaties, munitions, bombs, chemical weapons, planes, guns, tanks, warships, and other submarines, which Hitler was going to use from 1937, to carry out his campaigns?
  • Why do historians apparently attach no importance to what was, for more than 10 years, a flagrant violation of the Treaty of Versailles and a major attack on the policies of détente and disarmament carried out both by the League of Nations and by the pan-European movement of Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi?
  • How is it possible that a small inverted strike from the district of Schwäbing in Munich, without ideals, without culture and which had nothing of a warrior, came to power?
  • Why, when he had spent 4 years of war as a staff courier, far from the fighting, is Hitler still considered today, by many historians, as a “hero of the Great War”?
  • Why do the same historians forget his political commitment, when he was a soldier in the communist republic of Bavaria in 1920, elected convinced of a communist section in his regiment, and virulent to the point of being nicknamed “Addi the Red” ?
  • Why remove from any reasoning that the future leader of the Nazi party (NSDAP) denounced all his comrades, bringing them to the execution post, during the collapse of this republic, in order to save his life?
  • Why did he subsequently display such apparent hatred for Communism?
  • By virtue of what logic was it believed necessary to “forget” that he was put in charge by the leaders of the nationalist right of the secret services of the army, therefore of the big trusts – no doubt seduced by the capacities of exceptional adaptation of their new protege – to infiltrate the NSDAP, then to take the lead?
  • How was Hitler, then a simple political candidate with no personal fortune, able to finance the salaries and social contributions of a private army of 3 million men and the hundreds of meetings with great spectacles that made him famous, in a country ruined by its war debts and successive crises?
  • How is it that he was able to rearm Germany, remilitarize the Rhineland, carry out the Anschluss with Austria after having had its Chancellor assassinated, thus seizing gold reserves, armaments, raw materials? and Austrian factories, without firing a shot? All this with an army of operettas?
  • Which allowed him to support Franco militarily in Spain, thus opening up access to rare minerals from Spanish mines, then to seize Czechoslovakia and take control of its economy, without the great democratic powers lifting the little finger ?
    Why did the German Communist Party, following Stalin’s orders, help the Nazi Party to come to power by supporting it in three major elections?
    Why did Kurt von Schleicher, the “social general” who had presided, under the Weimar Republic, over the secret rearmament of Germany and the German-Soviet rapprochement, had he granted, on Stalin’s strong advice, forty million marks to the Nazis, in order to finance Hitler’s electoral campaign, while the party was on the verge of bankruptcy? Was his assassination during the Night of the Long Knives the way to make an embarrassing witness disappear?
  • How is it conceivable that commercial exchanges, and in particular the manufacture of arms by German factories on Soviet territory, continued between the USSR and the Nazi Reich, yet declared enemies since 1933?
  • Why did Stalin secretly initiate a rapprochement with the Third Reich, as early as 1935, when officially Hitler presented himself as the champion of the anti-communist struggle?
  • Why did Stalin eliminate from his army and his government all opponents of this rapprochement during the “bloody purges” of 1937?
  • Why did Heydrich and the Nazi secret services help him in this task, in particular by fabricating the false documents which would enable Marshal Tukhachevsky and the other supporters of an Anglo-Soviet alliance to be sentenced to death?
  • Why did German technicians and engineers continue to work secretly in the USSR, in German and Anglo-Saxon factories and companies, after Hitler came to power?
  • Why did the French government, also perfectly aware of Germany’s secret rearmament since 1923, do nothing to combat it?
  • Why did the great Lorraine metallurgists, even the most indomitable adversaries of Germany, like Mr. de Wendel, continue to supply their German counterparts Krupp or Thyssen, even after the Nazis took power, with all the steel necessary for manufacture their weapons, and this until 1939?
  • Why was the good quality coal that these steelworks needed delivered under the same conditions and without the slightest restriction, by the English industrialists?
  • Why did Sweden not apply any limits on the export of its steel?
  • Why did England and the United States act, as early as 1920, to politically isolate France and free themselves from the military commitments made to her, leaving their “Ally” alone in the face of the German danger?
  • Why was the “little alliance” uniting France and the Balkan countries, or even the Franco-Russian alliance, diplomatically opposed by the British?
  • Why did the English stubbornly refuse to consider an alliance with Russia from 1917 to 1939?
  • How is it that, a few days before the signing of the disastrous Treaty of Munich, Chamberlain, perfectly informed three times by the German generals that Hitler was going to be assassinated and the Nazi party decapitated, rushed into a plane, without even consult his own government, to land in Berlin and thus save, in full knowledge of the facts, the life of the dictator?
  • How have historians of all persuasions been able to dismiss from their reasoning that a few days before the invasion of Czechoslovakia, when the Prague Stock Exchange was logically collapsing, the world’s largest trusts rushed to buy back the shares of the largest Czech banks and companies?
  • That this process enriches in the same way the same “vulture” trusts, at the time of the other Hitlerian conquests?
  • That the investments of the German subsidiary of Unilever, a British industrial giant, increased from 20 million pounds sterling in 1930 to 37 million in 1939 and that the most intense period of investment corresponds very exactly to the takeover of Jewish companies, after the ‘Anschluss, then to the “Munich coup”, finally to that of Prague?
  • Why do historians omit to recall that France, the second colonial power after the British Empire, had been since the end of the 1920s the second world financial power, that it had the largest gold reserve after the United States? United, and in 1939 the most powerful army in Europe?
  • Why, when the Banque de France had been coming to the aid of the pound sterling in the midst of a debacle for years, did the British Minister of Finance decide, two days after having begged his French counterparts to buy back a few more million pounds , to devalue its currency, causing the Banque de France to lose millions of gold francs in one weekend?
  • Why did England rearm only partially and late, thus forcing France to rearm in 1932, and therefore to weaken its finances?
  • Why did the British government sign, in 1935, without consulting its French allies, a naval treaty allowing Hitler to rebuild a war fleet, again in complete contradiction with the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles?
  • Why do we still let the general public believe that the German army was perfectly armed and at the cutting edge of technology, when the Reich could no longer finance its rearmament program since 1937?
  • Why did Stalin sign the German-Soviet agreement with such haste in August 1939, when he was well aware that, a few weeks later, Hitler’s attack on Poland should have been postponed for several months? because of the onset of winter rains? – Could it be because this “unfortunate haste” allowing the forces of the Reich to surprise the Poles in their mobilization, at the same time took the French by surprise in their effort of rearmament, and gave the Nazis the possibility of seizing the factories? and Polish weapons in order to complete their armament for the famous “Blitzkrieg”?
  • Why did Stalin refuse, in 1941, for almost 24 hours, to believe in the German attack on his country, until he received the official declaration of war?
  • Why did Hitler attack the USSR by refusing to carry out an anti-Bolshevik campaign, which would have ensured him the support of the population and the enrollment of anti-Communist Russian divisions, if his objective was really to eradicate communism?
  • Why do historians so easily “forget” the two betrayals committed against Czechoslovakia, then Poland, by the British and French governments? Two countries to which they were bound by numerous treaties giving all guarantees of military intervention, in the event of a German attack…
  • Why have we erased from official history the beginnings of a Europe officially founded in Brussels by the steel, coal and chemical cartels on September 30, 1926?
  • Why, in 2021, are the experts still silent about the cartelization of the entire European economy and the distribution of the areas of influence of each of these cartels in the world?
  • Why was the role played by these same European cartels in the 1920s and 1930s also kept secret in order to protect themselves from industrial competition from the United States and to ensure the political independence of Europe in the face of American demands? ?
  • Why do historians continue to claim that the “Prague coup” of March 15, 1939, determined Chamberlain to have no further dealings with Hitler, when in July of the same year, less than two months before the outbreak of the hostilities, his principal adviser, Wilson, and his trade minister Hudson, negotiated a loan of one billion pounds sterling to the Nazi Reich, (that is to say 200 billion pounds sterling in present value), the abandonment of the guarantees given to Poland , and the distribution of reciprocal zones of influence in the world?

Zones of influence” corresponding to those of the cartels in charge of creating the “new world order”.

  • Why did Montagu Norman, both President of the Bank of England and Director of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), deliver Czechoslovakia’s central bank gold to Hitler, when nothing was there? obliged, and this in complete disagreement with the conventions signed with this State?
  • Why was this same Montagu Norman never worried, when he was, throughout the 1930s, the unfailing support of Hjalmar Schacht, declared Nazi and President of the Reichsbank, who organized the currency and the economy of a Reich, then in full rearmament?
  • Why do historians see Herman Goering as an extravagant drug addict, when between 1934 and 1939 he became one of the richest men in the world with his cartel the “Herman Goering Werke?” »

A global cartel, with multiple international ramifications, of which there is curiously no trace in historiography.

  • Why have we “forgotten” that the greatest French industrialists delivered the steel and the raw materials essential to the rearmament of the Nazi Reich until the declaration of war?
  • Why does this amnesia also concern the so-called “neutral” countries which participated in the same way in this massive rearmament?
  • How is it that the proxies of the main leaders of the largest American trusts found themselves at the head of the German war industries? This both in the USSR from 1923 where thousands of deportees from the Gulags would die in their factories, and later in Nazi Germany, in the very heart of the concentration camps, where again thousands of deportees would die to enrich the shareholders. of these firms?

I am talking here about Ford Germany, IG Farben, IBM, General Motors (Opel), ITT, AEG and hundreds of other officially “German” factories but with 80% or 100% American capital whose the interests were often very strongly linked to the Cartel Herman Goering Werke and whose members of the boards of directors were called, among others, Bush and Kennedy, respectively fathers and grandfather of three Presidents of the United States.

  • Why fail to recall that the future President Roosevelt made a fortune in the 1920s by creating an investment agency for American funds in Germany?
  • Why were Messrs. Dawes and Young chosen to draw up the economic aid plans for Germany when they belonged to certain management committees of the major American cartels already mentioned?
  • Why was 80% of the capital allocated to Germany under these Dawes and Young plans actually allocated to these same American companies, themselves associated with the giant Cartel: Herman Goering Werke?
  • How can we explain that, as soon as Hitler came to power in 1933, the United States increased its oil deliveries to the Hitler Reich in full rearmament, quadrupling these deliveries between 1933 and 1939, if not to allow their arms factories to operate at full capacity?
  • Why did J.P. Morgan, the most powerful banker on Wall Street, choose John Foster Dulles, at that time a lawyer for IG Farben and who in 1926 would be executive director of Sullivan and Cromwell, the law firm of all the American cartels, to organize the establishment of these trusts at the heart of the European economy?
  • Why did Hjalmar Schacht, Hitler’s finance minister in charge of financing the “miracle” of German rearmament, remain in constant contact with J.F. Dulles throughout his mandate?
  • Why was the brother of the latter, Alan Dulles, appointed head of the American secret services in Switzerland, if not to ensure in the shadows the smooth running of commercial relations between the USA and the Reich?
  • How could we “forget” that IBM New York (with 100% American management and capital) supplied the Nazis from 1934, then throughout the conflict, with the punched cards, the computers and the necessary technicians to identify and file the Jews (going back to the 4th generation), or even the opponents and the mentally and physically handicapped, promised to sterilization or elimination?
  • That these machines, rented by IBM at exorbitant prices from the Reich, and used in the heart of the concentration camps, were essential elements in the proper management and application of the Shoa?
  • That these same computers made it possible at the same time to list and file all the industrial, commercial and private wealth of the occupied countries, in order to organize their systematic looting, to organize the logistics of the army down to the smallest detail, or even the files of the Gestapo and the various services of repression and control of the German people…

A totally impossible task without IBM machines and the very foundation of the mythical German “efficiency”.

  • Why on December 13, 1941, only two days after the Reich’s declaration of war on the United States, did Roosevelt issue, very discreetly, a presidential decree allowing American companies to circumvent the embargo on the Nazi Reich, in order to that they can continue to do business with the Axis countries, as with the neutral countries living on good terms with these same enemy countries, on condition that they have a special authorization?
  • What logic followed American investments in Germany when they soared from $450 million when war broke out in 1939 to $475 million when Germany declared war on the United States in December 1941? That same year, 553 American affiliates worked for Nazi Germany.
  • Why in the fall of 1941 did the New York Stock Exchange steadily rise as it became increasingly clear that the Nazi “lightning war” in the east was not going to end in victory?
  • Why the role of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), headed by an American, which launders gold from the banks of occupied states, the proceeds of looting, dental gold, or jewelry from concentration camps, is it still hidden to this day?
  • Why does official history forget to recall the role played by some of the largest American banks, such as Chase Manhattan or J.P. Morgan, as well as that of Swiss banks, in the repatriation of the profits made by these companies? weapons during the war?
  • Why were the BRI, like all the large Swiss, American, English, French, Dutch etc. private banks, which participated in this systematic plunder of Europe for the benefit of the large international trusts, not worried?
  • How is it conceivable, when Berlin was bombarded in July 1940 by British heavy bombers, that no German arms factory with American capital, although located within their radius of action, was affected and that those they were able to continue to produce the armament necessary for the Reich, throughout the duration of the war, contributing at the same time to prolonging the war against the USSR?…
    Who will explain why, when Hitler had sent Churchill, in May 1941, a peace proposal providing for: A general disarmament, at the same time as the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of all German forces from the occupied countries, then the return democratic governments and free elections – this one was hidden from all the Allies by the British Prime Minister?
  • In the same vein, why was Rudolf Hess arrested as soon as he arrived? Then put incommunicado and held prisoner until his murder in Spandau prison in 1987, a few weeks before his release?
  • How is it that after the war, the few Cartels who suffered damage in the last months of the conflict, such as General Motors, or other large American companies, not only remained unpunished, but received compensation for the rare damage suffered by their German subsidiaries, following the British or American raids?

Compensation paid by governments, therefore taxpayers, German, French, or American…

  • How is it possible that IG Farben, which produced the ammunition, gasoline and rubber necessary for the German army throughout the war, IBM, Ford and General Motors (Opel) which built the tanks and trucks, or even ITT, which supplies all the electrical equipment, were able to resume their activities at the end of the war, in their factories intact, to participate in the reconstruction of Europe and the start of the Cold War?
  • How to explain that the Americans, who nevertheless had the possibility of landing in Europe from 1943, waited until 1944 and the inevitable victory of Russia, to engage in the West?
  • Why did they prefer to land in North Africa and the Middle East in 1942, if not to secure Iranian and Iraqi oil and access routes to Syria and North Africa, while blocking a possible Soviet advance towards this area? rich in oil?
  • Why is the Chinese and Eastern issue, essential for American tankers, as for the British Empire, so often “forgotten” by historians?
  • Why is the animosity between the USA and the British Empire in the 1920s and 1930s, particularly with regard to the same oil issues, completely concealed, when it was on the verge of degenerating into armed conflict?
  • Why were the largest French refineries all bombed and destroyed by the Anglo-Saxons, when they had no more oil to refine for a long time?
  • Why did the “experts” of all persuasions so easily “forget” the reception given at the Waldorf Astoria in New York on June 26, 1940, the day of France’s defeat? Rejoicings attended besides the German trade delegation, led by Gehrard Westrick: Mr. Edsel, the son of Henry Ford, representing the Ford factories. Representatives of General Motors, IBM, General Electric, Eastman Kodak, ITT, Standard Oil, accompanied by their lawyer in Germany. James D. Mooney, head of foreign investments at General Motors and its CEO, Alfred P. Sloan, who had this “good word” which we will admit reflected the thoughts of all the guests: “The democratic countries of the world have unintelligent leaders. No… Stupid, and short-sighted… So it’s only natural that democracies have to pack up when an alternative system comes along with leaders who are strong, smart, aggressive, who make people work longer and more actively and who have gangster instinct. And, indeed, it seems that now the democracies are no longer in the race. Five days later, the Nazi victory was again celebrated with great pomp, again at the Waldorf, this time by Rieber, big boss of Texaco and great friend of the fascists, Germans, Europeans and Americans. Once again, we saw the elite of international high finance crowding there, celebrating this economic windfall, this new advance in their European interests…

 

  • Why, for 70 years, have the secret services, mainly English, destroyed thousands of compromising documents? Murdered (sorry, you probably had to say “suicided”) key witnesses and maintained a leaden screed on the truth?
  • How is it that the attack on Pearl Harbor could have been a “surprise” for the American navy, when the British cipher services knew perfectly and without the slightest possible doubt the place of the attack, and this two days in advance?
  • Why was the “Octagon System” that allowed the CIA and ex-Nazis to exfiltrate the Nazi war chest so carefully camouflaged to this day?
  • What was the role of Chancellor Adenauer in the rearmament of Germany and the “Octagon” system, which used SS gold to finance his political party, the CDU, subservient to the USA?
  • Who wanted and started the Cold War? And why ?
  • Finally, why have those who write History for the Peoples so casually “forgotten” the warning issued on January 17, 1961, by President Eisenhower, when he was about to leave power, against the power of the military-industrial lobby: “We must be wary of unwarranted influence, whether intended or not, by the military-industrial complex. The risk of a fatal increase in the abuse of power exists and will persist. Let us never let the weight of this complex endanger our freedoms or our democracy. »
  • And this corollary question: Why was J.F. Kennedy assassinated when he was preparing, on the advice of President de Gaulle, to end the war in Vietnam?

Everyone will have understood it, I could continue this list on many pages, but I had promised to stick to the Second World War…

“We never lie as much as before the elections, during the war and after the hunt”, used to say Georges Clemenceau, and one observation is essential in 2021: The line remains correct, since the works published to date do not answer any of these questions in a synthetic way.

While the facts are perfectly known, the archives have been opened, the books written, the proponents of “Official History”, avoid criticizing them, modestly turning their eyes away from the work of their colleagues and the indisputable reality of the archives. , for lack of being able to mention them without compromising the interests of those who remain the “Masters of the Planet”, and whose names have shone continuously for more than a century, at the tops of the tallest buildings.

To these essential questions, which in turn generate so many others, the “experts” answer:

“Evil genius, reign of terror, fault of the German people, envoy of the Devil, racist ideology, incomprehensible madness, fatal illogicality” and other hazy explanations.

In reality, all this is a tall tale, by which the accredited authors accumulate honors and official recognition, because there has never been a war without, at its origin, a basely self-serving intention, a well-ordered financing, and a perfectly determined will.

No “fatality” has ever been taken into account, and the Second World War and its sixty-five million victims, did not break the rule, despite all the smokescreens that we fought to deploy for 70 years.

This is why the entire history of the 20th century can be summed up in two strong ideas:

  • The first is economic with the emergence of new economic powers and the opening of new markets. (Germany, Russia, China)
  • To manage them as well as possible, the big global trusts have organized themselves into cartels and have shared the planet in order to avoid competing with each other. Each cartel has its Zone of Influence.
  • It was in order to oppose the ever-increasing stake taken by Anglo-Saxon cartels in German companies that their European counterparts came together to try to put an end to the “infiltration” of their industries.
  • Hitler put himself at their head, thus defying his former Anglo-Saxon sponsors, and there was war.

  • The second major fact is social.
  • A new conception of social relations in opposition to old values ​​and conservative powers had appeared with the century.
  • Their spearhead: Communist and socialist ideas. Skilful maneuver orchestrated by big international “black” capital in order to order to their advantage the ideas of freedom, social justice and democracy. Because everything in economy, therefore in politics, is a matter of legitimacy, therefore manipulation of opinions and Peoples.
  • The third data is ideological, since it was necessary to find the pretexts able to mobilize Peoples already strongly tired by the First world war and having no desire to repeat the same errors.

This is why the Great Stateless black capital, tax evader and instigator of wars and revolutions of all kinds financed Communism and Fascism, two forces apparently contradictory, but only capable of blinding the Peoples made vulnerable by the economic disorders that succeeded the Great War.
It is these upheavals that will decide everything.

This is what we must remember if we want to understand why billions were invested in war material and why hundreds of millions of human beings were sacrificed, during the bloodiest century in history.


EXTRACT FROM THE WILL OF SIDNEY WARBURG.

TO ORDER THE BOOK

Click here