The parallels to be drawn between the global geopolitical situation at the start of the 21st century and that of 1927, on the eve of the great stock market crash of 1929, are so obvious that one can only be surprised that the Peoples are not more informed.
Unless, of course, this kind of evidence is simply hidden “for their greater good”. After all, aren’t they “too immature” to be informed of certain realities?
In reality, it is under this persistent pretext that, for centuries, opinions have been manipulated and that economic crises have been able to lead to the wars that we know.
Also, it is probably worth recalling that those who were its instruments were the first to boast of it:
Here is what Goering and Goebbels said during the Nuremberg Trials:
Göring: “People can always be trained on orders from the rulers. It’s easy. All you have to do is tell them they are under attack, and denounce the pacifists for their lack of patriotism and the fact that they put the country in danger. It always works the same in all countries.
Goebbels: “The most brilliant propaganda technique will have no success unless there is one fundamental principle which must be constantly kept in mind – you must limit yourself to a few points and repeat them over and over again.
It becomes in fact of vital importance for the State to use all its powers to suppress dissent, so true is it that truth is the mortal enemy of falsehood, and that by extension truth is the greatest enemy. of State. »
Göring: “Of course people don’t want war. Why would some poor guy on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can do is get back to his farm in one piece?
Of course, ordinary people don’t want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. It is very clear. But, after all, it is the rulers of the country who set the policy and it is always an elementary matter to lead the people, whether in a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or parliament, or a communist dictatorship. »
And who today can deny that the Peoples of the world remain subject to this unwritten law?
Response from Alexander Solzhenitsyn: “We are not mistaken because the truth is hard to see. It is visible at first glance. We deceive ourselves because lying is more comfortable. »
And three hundred years before him, that of Diderot: “We greedily swallow any lie that flatters us, but only drink drop by drop, if at all, the truth that we find bitter. »
And why is the family secrecy enforced by so-called “democratic” states about French military betrayal so sweet, and the truth so uncomfortable?
Quite simply, because it has been adopted by the whole world and has become the basis of all our thoughts.
Better ! It has become part of ourselves, since all our moral choices are based on the conception of the struggle of the forces of Good against those of Evil. Those of Evil systematically representing “the enemy”, to which the same principles are of course inculcated…
The initial lie therefore becomes “my lie”, and even our lie, the one that binds our societies together.
This is why, by attacking him, the Revisionist Historian calls into question our vision of the world and the way in which we perceive its rules, therefore our most intimate, most structured personality.
And we will fight, sometimes unconsciously, sometimes in spite of the most elementary common sense, so that this lie remains our reality.
Moreover, the same so-called “democratic” societies have inherited the sad habit of reinforcing their power by a sort of alliance with the divine concept, since God is supposed to grant victory to each camp in order to defend The One Truth.
Finally, if we add to this the authority represented by an elected government, the army or the law, to attack these fundamentals is, in the oedipal context, to question the authority of the protective father!
And how could one resist such pressures?
So, even though many of us are aware of the problem, it is not easy to admit that we have been fooled. Especially since another negative feeling is added to it: The instinctive disgust of lies.
This is why only the historical truth duly taught to the younger generations by historians and researchers working only on archives, and above all far from any political consideration, will allow them to distinguish the different meanings attributed to the words “democracy” or “freedom”, and will remind them that if the truth can hurt, the lie kills for sure…
Because the big question, in fact the only important one today for our children, is whether Memory is a common heritage, whether, one and indivisible, it belongs uniquely to each inhabitant of this planet, who, at birth, would receive in sharing the inalienable right to have access to the History of a world built by his ancestors, to count as such each drop of sweat and blood shed by his family.
And if it really is a right, lying to him would be a crime. Or if the human should be considered as an instrument of production, coming into the world without this heritage, and dying without transmitting it?
This is what you will have to decide, before giving yourself the material means to act.
Le Forum des historiens en colère - Tous droits réservés